Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Original Article

Development of the Motivation to Participate in Psychological Research Scale

Published Online:January 23, 2020https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000317

Abstract

Abstract. In a series of four studies, I developed and found evidence supporting the validity of a new measure, the Motivation to Participate in Psychological Research Scale (MPPRS). Based upon the tenets of Self-Determination Theory and aimed at measuring motivation in undergraduate students, the scale demonstrated a three-factor structure in exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (Study 1: N = 238, Study 2: N = 264, Study 3: N = 297). Factors corresponded to autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, and amotivation. Preliminary evidence supported the validity of MPPRS scores, and subscales differentiated psychology majors from non-majors, as well as associated with the timing of research participation during the semester. Examining student motivation with the MPPRS has possible implications for data quality, as a moderator of research findings, and might be used to track changes in students’ interest regarding psychological research. However, future research is needed to assess the predictive validity of the MPPRS.

References

  • American Psychological Association (APA). APA guidelines for the undergraduate psychology major: Version 2.0. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ed/precollege/undergrad/index.aspx First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Anduiza, E., & Galais, C. (2017). Answering without reading: IMCs and strong satisficing in online surveys. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 29, 497–519. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edw007 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Arnett, J. J. (2008). The neglected 95% Why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist, 63, 602–614. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.7.602 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bensch, D., Paulhus, D. L., Stankov, L., & Ziegler, M. (2019). Teasing apart overclaiming, overconfidence, and socially desirable responding. Assessment, 26, 351–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117700268 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brody, J. L., Gluck, J. P., & Aragon, A. S. (2000). Participants’ understanding of the process of psychological research: Debriefing. Ethics and Behavior, 10, 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327019EB1001_2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Butler, D. L. (1999). Why do students miss psychology experiments and what can be done about it?. In G. D. ChastainE. R. LandrumEds., Protecting human subjects: Departmental subject pools and institutional review boards (pp. 109–124). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.197 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chemolli, E., & Gagne, M. (2014). Evidence against the continuum structure underlying motivation measures derived from self-determination theory. Psychological Assessment, 26, 575–585. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036212 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Darling, J., Goedert, K., Ceynar, M., Shore, W., & Anderson, D. (2007). Learning about the means to the end: What US Introductory Psychology students report about experimental participation. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 6, 91–97. https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2007.6.2.91 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Deci, E. L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. R. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62, 119–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00797.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Self-determination theory. In P. A. M. LangeA. W. KruglanskiT. E. HigginsEds., Handbook of theories in social psychology (pp. 416–436). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dumfart, B., & Neubauer, A. C. (2016). Conscientiousness is the most powerful noncognitive predictor of school achievement in adolescents. Journal of Individual Differences, 37, 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000182 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Elicker, J. D., McConnell, N. L., & Hall, R. J. (2010). Research participation for course credit in Introduction to Psychology: Why don’t people participate? Teaching of Psychology, 37, 183–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986283.2010.488521 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Estes, D., Chandler, M., Horvath, K. J., & Backus, D. W. (2003). American and British college students’ epistemological beliefs about research on psychological and biological development. Applied Developmental Psychology, 23, 625–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-3973(03)00002-9 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fernet, C., Austin, S., & Vallerand, R. J. (2012). The effects of work motivation on employee exhaustion and commitment: An extension of the JD-R model. Work and Stress, 26, 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2012.713202 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). Autonomy in children’s learning: An experimental and individual difference investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 890–898. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.5.890 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W. F. (1988). Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.265 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., & Blanchard, C. (2000). On the assessment of situational intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS). Motivation and Emotion, 24, 175–213. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005614228250 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–135. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hom, H. L. (1987). A methodological note: Time of participation effects on intrinsic motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 210–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167287132006 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structure Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Huang, J. L., Curran, P. G., Keeney, J., Poposki, E. M., & DeShon, R. P. (2012). Detecting and deterring insufficient effort responding to surveys. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27, 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-011-9231-8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The “Big Five” Inventory – Versions 4a and 54. (Technical Report). Berkeley, CA: Institute of Personality and Assessment Research, University of California. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. JohnR. W. RobinsL. A. PervinEds., Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114–158). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Keatley, D., Clarke, D. D., & Hagger, M. S. (2013). Investigating the predictive validity of implicit and explicit measures of motivation in problem-solving behavioural tasks. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 510–524. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2012.02107.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mallett, C., Kawabata, M., Newcombe, P., Otero-Forero, A., & Jackson, S. (2007). Sport Motivation Scale – 6 (SMS-6): A revised six-factor sport motivation scale. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8, 600–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.12.005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Maniaci, M. R., & Rogge, R. D. (2014). Caring about carelessness: Participant inattention and its effects on research. Journal of Research in Personality, 48, 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.09.008 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Moyer, A., & Franklin, N. (2011). Strengthening the educational value of undergraduate participation in research as part of a psychology department subject pool. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 6, 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2011.6.1.75 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nimmer, J. G., & Handelsman, M. M. (1992). Effects of subject pool policy on student attitudes toward psychology and psychological research. Teaching of Psychology, 19, 141–144. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top1903_2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Papanastasiou, E. C. (2005). Factor structure of the “Attitudes Toward Research” scale. Statistics Education Research Journal, 4, 16–26. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. RobinsonP. R. ShaverL. S. WrightsmanEds., Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17–59). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Paulhus, D. L. (2012). Overclaiming on personality questionnaires. In M. ZieglerC. MacCannR. D. RobertsEds., New perspectives on faking in personality assessment (pp. 151–164). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., Tuson, K. M., Briere, N. M., & Blais, M. R. (1995). Toward a new measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation in sports: The Sport Motivation Scale (SMS). Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 17, 35–53. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Phillips, P., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2003). Personality, cognition, and university students’ examination performance. European Journal of Personality, 17, 435–448. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.488 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Roberts, L. D., & Allen, P. J. (2013). A brief measure of student perceptions of the educational value of research participation. Australian Journal of Psychology, 65, 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Senecal, C., Koestner, R., & Vallerand, R. J. (1995). Self-regulation and academic procrastination. The Journal of Social Psychology, 135, 607–619. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1995.9712234 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sieber, J. E., & Saks, M. J. (1989). A census of subject pool characteristics and polices. American Psychologist, 44, 1053–1061. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.7.1053 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Trafimow, D., Madson, L., & Gwizdowski, I. (2006). Introductory psychology students’ perceptions of alternatives to research participation. Teaching of Psychology, 33, 247–249. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top3304_7 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. F. (1992). The Academic Motivation Scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1003–1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052004025 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: The synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 246–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.246 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vlachopoulos, S. P., & Michailidou, S. (2006). Development and initial validation of a measure of autonomy, competence, and relatedness in exercise: The basic psychological needs in exercise scale. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 10, 179–201. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327841mpee1003_4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar