Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Three-Mode Models for Multitrait-Multimethod Data

Published Online:July 23, 2009https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.5.3.78

Abstract

Multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) data are characterized by three modes: traits, methods, and subjects. Considering subjects as random, and traits and methods as fixed, stochastic three-mode models can be used to analyze MTMM covariance data. Stochastic three-mode models can be written as linear latent variable models with direct product (DP) restrictions on the parameter matrices (Oort, 1999), yielding three-mode factor models (Bentler & Lee, 1979) and composite direct product models (Browne, 1984) as special cases. DP restrictions on factor loadings and factor correlations facilitate interpretation of the results and enable easy evaluation of the validity requirements of MTMM correlations (Campbell & Fiske, 1959). As an illustrative example, a series of stochastic three-mode models has been fitted to data of three personality traits of 482 students, measured with 12 items, through three methods.

References

  • Bentler, P. M. , Lee, S. Y. (1978). Statistical aspects of a three-mode factor analysis model. Psychometrika, 43, 343–352. Crossref, Google Scholar

  • Bentler, P. M. , Lee, S. Y. (1979). A statistical development of three-mode factor analyses. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 32, 87–104. Crossref, Google Scholar

  • Bloxom, B. (1968). A note on invariance in three-mode factor analysis. Psychometrika, 33, 347–350. Crossref, Google Scholar

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley. Crossref, Google Scholar

  • Browne, M. W. (1984). The decomposition of multitrait-multimethod matrices. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 1–21. Crossref, Google Scholar

  • Browne, M. W. , Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21, 230–258. Crossref, Google Scholar

  • Browne, M. W. , Du Toit, S. H. C. (1992). Automated fittings of nonstandard models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27, 269–300. Crossref, Google Scholar

  • Campbell, D. T. , Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105. Crossref, Google Scholar

  • Eid, M. , Lischetzke, T. , Nussbeck, F. W. , Geiser, C. (2004). Die Multitrait-Multimethod-Analyse: Entwicklung neuer Modelle und ihre Anwendung in der Differentiellen und Diagnostischen Psychologie (DFG-Projekt EI 379/5–2). Landau in der Pfalz: Universität Koblenz-Landau. Google Scholar

  • Neale, M. C. , Boker, S. M. , Xie, G. , & Maes, H. H. (1999). Mx: Statistical modeling (5th ed.). Box 126 MCV, Richmond, VA 23298: Department of Psychiatry, www.vcu.edu/mx. Google Scholar

  • Oort, F. J. (1999). Stochastic three-mode models for mean and covariance structures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 52, 243–272. Crossref, Google Scholar

  • Oort, F. J. (2001). Three-mode models for multivariate longitudinal data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 54, 49–78. Crossref, Google Scholar

  • Tucker, L. R. (1966). Some mathematical notes on three mode factor analysis. Psychometrika, 31, 279–311. Crossref, Google Scholar

  • Yuan, K. H. , Bentler, P. M. (1998). Normal theory based test statistics in structural equation modelling. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 51, 289–309. Crossref, Google Scholar