Response Interference in Compatibility Tasks
Effects of Target Strength in Affective Priming and Stroop
Abstract
Affective priming (AP) is a well-established phenomenon in which performance to a valenced target is typically better when it is preceded by an affectively congruent prime than when it is preceded by an incongruent prime. Several studies have emphasized a strong similarity between AP and Stroop suggesting that both are driven by response interference. The present study investigated this hypothesis by testing whether a general prediction of the response interference model was verified in the two tasks. This prediction refers to target strength and states that the size of compatibility effects should increase as the strength of the relevant information decreases. In four experiments, we show that this general prediction of the response interference model was verified in AP and Stroop when the strength of the relevant information was manipulated at the perceptual level (Experiments 1 and 2), while the opposite pattern was observed when this variable was manipulated at the semantic level (Experiments 3 and 4). While the results do not undermine the hypothesis that AP and Stroop effects are governed by response interference, they suggest that the model should be refined in order to account for differential effects of target strength in compatibility tasks.
References
(1986). Distinguishing conscious from unconscious perceptual processes. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 40, 343–367.
(2003). A structural analysis of indirect measures of attitudes. In , The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 219–244). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2002). Affective priming of semantic categorisation responses. Cognition & Emotion, 16, 643–666.
(2001). Affective priming of pronunciation responses: Effects of target degradation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 85–91.
(1981). The Stroop effect: Brain potentials localize the source of interference. Science, 214, 938–940.
(1974). Effects of noise letters on the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143–149.
(2001). On the automatic activation of associated evaluations: An overview. Cognition & Emotion, 16, 115–141.
(1982). Attitude accessibility, attitude–behavior consistency, and the strength of the object–evaluation association. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 339–357.
(1983). Toward a process model of the attitude–behavior relation: Accessing one’s attitude upon mere observation of the attitude object. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 723–735.
(1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229–238.
(1967). Human performance. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cde.
(2010). Attentional influences on affective priming: Does categorization influence spontaneous evaluations of multiply categorizable objects? Cognition & Emotion, 24, 1008–1025.
(1994). The affective priming effect: Automatic activation of evaluative information in memory. Cognition & Emotion, 8, 515–533.
(1993). Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: Implications for the role of the N400 in language processing. Psychophysiology, 30, 47–61.
(2004). DirectRT (Version 2004.3.27) [Computer Software]. New York, NY: Empirisoft Corporation.
(2001). Does sunshine prime loyal? Affective priming in the naming task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 727–751.
(2002). Goal-dependent and goal-independent effects of irrelevant evaluations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 802–814.
(2003). Affective priming: Findings and theories. In , The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 219–244). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2005). Priming of semantic classifications: Late and response-related, or earlier and more central? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 897–903.
(1997). List-context effects in evaluative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 246–255.
(2007). Controllability and resource dependence in automatic evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 648–655.
(2009). Contrast effects in spontaneous evaluations: A psychophysical account. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 265–287.
(1995). Stimulus-Response compatibility with relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions that do and do not overlap with the response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 855–875.
(1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility: A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270.
(2007). Levels of processing during non-conscious perception: A critical review. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 362, 857–875.
(2005). International affective picture system (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical Report A-6. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.
(1979). When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task. Memory and Cognition, 7, 166–174.
(1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203.
(1990). Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective. Pacific Grove, CA: Wadsworth.
(1997). Parallels between perception without attention and perception without awareness. Consciousness & Cognition, 6, 219–236.
(1976). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Evidence for facilitatory and inhibitory processes. Memory and Cognition, 4, 648–654.
(1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226–254.
(1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of currents findings and theories. In , Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264–336). Hillsdale, Hove, London: Erlbaum.
(1977). Inhibitory and facilitatory processes in selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 444–450.
(1990). Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective. Amsterdam: North-Holland Vol. 65. Advances in psychology.
(1967). Color association values and response interference on variants of the Stroop test. Acta Psychologica, 26, 286–295.
(2006). Pay attention! Attention to the primes increases attitude assessment accuracy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 784–791.
(2004). On the replicability of the affective priming effect in the pronunciation task. Experimental Psychology, 51, 109–115.
(1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.
(1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37, 571–590.
(1999). Activation and inhibition of affective information: Evidence for negative priming in the evaluation task. Cognition & Emotion, 13, 65–91.
