Abstract
Abstract. Semantic and syntactic prediction effects were investigated in a word naming task using semantic or syntactic contexts that varied between three and six words. Participants were asked to read the contexts silently and name a target word, which was indicated by a color change. Semantic contexts were composed of lists of semantically associated words without any syntactic information. Syntactic contexts were composed of semantically neutral sentences, in which the grammatical category but not the lexical identity of the final word was highly predictable. When the presentation time of the context words was long (1,200 ms), both semantically and syntactically related contexts facilitated reading aloud latencies of target words and syntactically related contexts produced larger priming effects than semantically related contexts in two out of three analyses. When the presentation time was short (200 ms), however, syntactic context effects disappeared, while semantic context effects remained significant. Across the three experiments, longer contexts produced faster response latencies, but longer contexts did not produce larger priming effects. The results are discussed in the context of the extant literature on semantic and syntactic priming and more recent evidence, suggesting that syntactic information constrains single word recognition.
References
(2018). Reading as statistical learning. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(3S), 634–643. 10.1044/2018_LSHSS-STLT1-17-0135
(2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge University Press.
(2009). Predictions: A universal principle in the operation of the human brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1521), 1181–1182. 10.1098/rstb.2008.0321
(2011). Predictions in the Brain: Using our past to generate a future. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195395518.001.0001
(2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
(1980). Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies. Memory & Cognition, 8(6), 493–512. 10.3758/BF03213769
(1985). Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 60(4), 343–355. 10.1016/0013-4694(85)90008-2
(2013). Skewness and Kurtosis in real data samples. Methodology, 9(2), 78–84. 10.1027/1614-2241/a000057
(1988). Rapid naming is affected by association but not by syntax. Memory & Cognition, 16(3), 187–195. 10.3758/BF03197751
(2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113(2), 234–272. 10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.234
(2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 181–204. 10.1017/S0140525X12000477
(1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407. 10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407
(1983). Iconic memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences, 302(1110), 283–294. 10.1098/rstb.1983.0055
(1999). Form and content: Dissociating syntax and semantics in sentence comprehension. Neuron, 24(2), 427–432. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80855-7
(2021). Universal dependencies. Computational Linguistics, 47(2), 1–54. 10.1162/coli_a_00402
(2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8(8), 1117–1121. 10.1038/nn1504
(1985). Automatic and strategic effects in semantic priming: An examination of Becker’s verification model. Memory & Cognition, 13(3), 228–232. 10.3758/BF03197685
(2012). How prediction errors shape perception, attention, and motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 548. 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00548
(1998). Replicable unconscious semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127(3), 286–303. 10.1037/0096-3445.127.3.286
(2015). Effects in production of word pre-activation during listening: Are listener-generated predictions specified at a speech-sound level?. Memory & Cognition, 43(1), 111–120. 10.3758/s13421-014-0451-9
(1981). Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20(6), 641–655. 10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90220-6
(2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112(4), 777–813. 10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.777
(1998). Investigating single-word syntactic primes in naming tasks: A recurrent network approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(2), 648–663. 10.1037/0096-1523.24.2.648
(1999). Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: Implications for group differences in response latency. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 777–799. 10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.777
(1999). A rose by any other name: Long-term memory structure and sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(4), 469–495. 10.1006/jmla.1999.2660
(2021). Predicting syntactic structure. Brain Research, 1770, 147632. 10.1016/j.brainres.2021.147632
(1977). Semantic facilitation without association in a lexical decision task. Memory & Cognition, 5(3), 335–339. 10.3758/BF03197580
(1978). Latency of associative activation in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4(3), 455–470. 10.1037/0096-1523.4.3.455
(1998). The pros and cons of masked priming. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27(2), 203–233. 10.1023/A:1023202116609
(2003). The role of left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: Localizing syntactic and semantic processes. Cerebral Cortex, 13(2), 170–177. 10.1093/cercor/13.2.170
(2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 127–138. 10.1038/nrn2787
(2009). Predictive coding under the free-energy principle. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1521), 1211–1221. 10.1098/rstb.2008.0300
(2022). The effects of semantic and syntactic prediction on reading aloud. https://osf.io/geyhs
(1981). The role of syntactic context in word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 9(6), 580–586. 10.3758/BF03202352
(2012). Studies of mind and brain: Neural principles of learning, perception, development, cognition, and motor control (Vol. 70). Springer Science & Business Media.
(2019). Vector-space models of semantic representation from a cognitive perspective: A discussion of common misconceptions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(6), 1006–1033. 10.1177/1745691619861372
(2001). A probabilistic Earley parser as a psycholinguistic model. In Proceedings of NAACL (Vol. 2, pp. 159–166).
(1986). Performance of some resistant rules for outlier labeling. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81(396), 991–999. 10.1080/01621459.1986.10478363
(2010). Semantic preview benefit in eye movements during reading: A parafoveal fast-priming study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(5), 1150–1170. 10.1037/a0020233
(2013). The predictive mind. Oxford University Press.
(2018). Domain generality and specificity of statistical learning and its relation with reading ability. In T. LachmannT. Weis (Éds.), Reading and dyslexia (Vol. 16, pp. 33–55). Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978-3-319-90805-2_2
(2022). Individual differences in artificial and natural language statistical learning. Cognition, 225, Article 105123. 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105123
(2013). Prediction plays a key role in language development as well as processing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 360–361. 10.1017/S0140525X12002609
(2008). DISCO: A multilingual database of distributionally similar words. In A. StorrerA. GeykenA. SiebertK.-M. Würzner (Eds.), Proceedings of KONVENS-2008 (Vol. 156, p. 8). KONVENS.
(2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 621–647. 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
(1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 207(4427), 203–205. 10.1126/science.7350657
(1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307(5947), 161–163. 10.1038/307161a0
(2008). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, 106(3), 1126–1177. 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.006
(1984). Semantic priming without association: A second look. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23(6), 709–733. 10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90434-1
(2015). Words and the world: Predictive coding and the language–perception–cognition interface. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(4), 279–284. 10.1177/0963721415570732
(2012). Prediction during language processing is a piece of cake—but only for skilled producers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(4), 843–847. 10.1037/a0029284
(2021). The contribution of semantics to the sentence superiority effect. Scientific Reports, 11, 1–6. 20148. 10.1038/s41598-021-99565-6
(1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90(2), 227–234. 10.1037/h0031564
(2013). Exploiting similarities among languages for machine translation. http://arxiv.org/abs/1309.4168
(2013). Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Z. GhahramaniWelling M.Cortes C.Lawrence N. D.K. Q. Weinberger (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (Vol. 26, pp. 3111–3119). Neural Infection Processing Systems Foundation.
(1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Dans BesnerG. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual ord REcognition (1st ed., pp. 272–344). Routledge.
(1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31(6), 785–806. 10.1016/0749-596X(92)90039-Z
(1997). Associative and semantic priming effects occur at very short stimulus-onset asynchronies in lexical decision and naming. Cognition, 62(2), 223–240. 10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00782-2
(2018). Predicting while comprehending language: A theory and review. Psychological Bulletin, 144(10), 1002–1044. 10.1037/bul0000158
(2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 329–347. 10.1017/S0140525X12001495
(1999). Predictive coding in the visual cortex: A functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. Nature Neuroscience, 2(1), 79–87. 10.1038/4580
(1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105(1), 125–157. 10.1037/0033-295X.105.1.125
(1984). Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 12(4), 315–328. 10.3758/BF03198291
(1991). Graphemic, associative, and syntactic priming effects at a brief stimulus onset asynchrony in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(3), 459–477. 10.1037/0278-7393.17.3.459
(2019). An attempt to conceptually replicate the dissociation between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension. Neuroscience, 413, 219–229. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.06.003
(2017). The sentence superiority effect revisited. Cognition, 168, 217–221. 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.07.003
(1960). The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 74(11), 1–29. 10.1037/h0093759
(2015). The effect of lexical predictability on eye movements in reading: Critical review and theoretical interpretation. Language and Linguistics Compass, 9(8), 311–327. 10.1111/lnc3.12151
(1953). Cloze procedure: A new tool for measuring readability. Journalism Quarterly, 30(4), 415–433. 10.1177/107769905303000401
(2021). Fast syntax in the brain: Eletrophysiological evidence from the rapid parallel visual presentation paradigm (RPVP). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47(1), 99–112. 10.1037/xlm0000811
