Challenging the Frame in the News
The Role of Issue Involvement, Attitude, and Competing Frames
Abstract
The present study contributes to the external validity of the framing concept by studying the effects of frames actually utilized in newspaper articles. The study assesses the persuasive influence of such frames on the interpretation of news, and how issue involvement and attitude interfere in this process. A total of 282 participants were presented with one of three experimental versions of a newspaper article about asylum. In the first condition the asylum seekers were implicitly labeled as innocent victims, in the second as intruders. The third version is a mixed condition in which both competing frames were applied. In all three conditions an identical photograph was inserted. The findings indicate that the frame suggests how the photograph can be interpreted. However, no indications were found for a moderating role of the news readers’ issue involvement or attitude.
References
(1977). Image – music – text. Glasgow: Collins.
(2002). Framing, value words, and citizens explanations of their issue opinions. Political Communication, 19, 303–316.
(2003). Values, political knowledge, and public opinion about gay rights. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67, 173–201.
(1982). Looking at photographs. In , Thinking photography (pp. 142– 153). London: MacMillan.
(1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. New York: Oxford University Press.
(2007). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57, 99–118.
(2001). The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behavior, 23, 225–256.
(2004). Political preference formation: Competition, deliberation, and the (ir)relevance of framing effects. American Political Science Review, 98, 671–686.
(2003). Framing and deliberation: How citizens’ conversations limit elite influence. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 729–745.
(2007). Wanted, dead or alive: Media frames, frame adoption, and support for the war in Afghanistan. Journal of Communication, 57, 119–141.
(1991). Framing U.S. coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran Air incidents. Journal of Communication, 41(4), 6–28.
(1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.
(1991). Social cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
(1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1–37.
(1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making & unmaking of the new left. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
(1988). Processing the news: How people tame the information tide (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
(1976). The determination of news photographs. In , The manufacture of news: Social problems, deviance and the mass media (pp. 176–190). London: Constable.
(2007). The sophisticated public: The effect of competing frames on public opinion. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30, 377–396.
(1999). The experience of refugees as aid recipients. In , Refugees: Perspectives on the experience of forced migration (pp. 136–168). London: Continuum.
(1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93, 258–268.
(2004). Seeking asylum in Europe. Economic Policy, 38, 5–62.
(1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In , Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133–168). New York: Guilford.
(1990). Rethinking victimization: An international approach to victimology. Symbolic Interaction, 13(1), 103–122.
(2007). Asylum seekers in the news: Frames of illegality and control. Observatorio (OBS*), 1, 145–161.
(2000). The European Union and the securitization of migration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 38, 751–777.
(2007). Applying a cognitive-processing model to presidential debate effects: Postdebate news analysis and primed reflection. Journal of Communication, 57, 40–59.
(1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
(1994). A priming effect analysis of media influences: An update. In , Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 43–60). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2007). Curmudgeonly advice. Journal of Communication, 57, 155–162.
(1990). Mimicking political debate with survey questions: The case of white opinion on affirmative action for blacks. Social Cognition, 8(1), 73–103.
(2007). Framing and frame analysis. In , Media studies: Key issues and debates. Los Angeles: Sage.
(2004). Domesticating NATO’s war in Kosovo/a: (In)visible bodies and the dilemma of photojournalism. Meridians: Feminism, Race, Transnationalism, 4(2), 1–38.
(2005). Framing peace policies: The competition for resonant themes. Political Communication, 22, 83–108.
(2007). Beyond accessibility? Toward an on-line and memory-based model of framing effects. Communications, 32, 51–78.
(2003). Exploring the framing effects of emotion: Do discrete emotions differentially influence information accessibility, information seeking, and policy preference? Communication Research, 30, 224–247.
(1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science Review, 91, 567–583.
(1997). Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behavior, 19, 221–246.
(1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10, 55–75.
(1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer.
(1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 136.
(2007). Framing controversies: Television and the 2002 Presidential Election in Brazil. Political Communication, 24, 19–36.
(1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In , Progress in communication sciences: Advances in persuasion. Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
(2002). Humanitarianism and representations of the refugee. Journal of Refugee Studies, 15, 247–264.
(1997). Strategy and issue frames in election campaign coverage: A social cognitive account of framing effects. Journal of Communication, 47, 26–48.
(2002). Content or design? Factors influencing the circulation of U.S. and German newspapers. Communications, 27(1), 1–14.
(2004). The interplay of news frames on cognitive complexity. Human Communication Research, 30(1), 102–120.
(2004). Chronic accessibility and individual cognitions: Examining the effects of message frames in political advertisements. Journal of Communication, 54, 123–137.
(2000). The interaction of news and advocate frames: Manipulating audience perceptions of a local public policy issue. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 804–829.
(2001). On-line versus memory-based processing: The role of “need to evaluate” in person perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1599–1612.
(1978). Making news: A study in the construction of reality. New York: The Free Press.
. (2009). Asylum levels and trends in industrialized countries 2008 (preliminary report 24 March 2009). Geneva: UNHCR.
(1999). The effects of news frames on readers’ thoughts and recall. Communication Research, 26, 550–569.
(2005). Where is the frame? Victims and intruders in the Belgian press coverage of the asylum issue. European Journal of Communication, 20, 485–508.
(2007). The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back in. Journal of Communication, 57, 60–87.
(1992). The nature and origin of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
