Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Testing a Universal Tool for Measuring Parasocial Interactions Across Different Situations and Media

Findings from Three Studies

Published Online:May 20, 2010https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000004

Abstract

Although research on parasocial interactions (PSI) has over 50 years of tradition, it provides a heterogeneous status of measurements and findings. The challenge for present and future PSI research is to provide measurement standards that are generated, confirmed, and validated across several studies. The present contribution tries to take a first step in this direction by exploring PSI with (1) nonmediated fictional characters (theater), (2) mediated fictional characters (soaps), and (3) mediated nonfictional characters (quiz shows). All three studies are based on the same theory (Two-Level Model of PSI) and on parts of the same corresponding measurement tool (PSI-Process Scales). All in all, the PSI-Process Scales show high usability in all three contexts, with the option to select PSI dimensions and items with respect to the study’s focus. Even in a theater play, the PSI-Process Scales could be applied without any problems and without any changes in the item wordings. The results of the three studies offer new insights into the importance of specific user and persona characteristics for the constitution and intensity of PSI in different media genres.

References

  • Auter, P. J. , Palmgreen, P. (2000). Development and validation of a parasocial interaction measure: The audience-persona interaction scale. Communication Research Reports, 17, 79–89. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Caughey, J. L. (1986). Social relations with media figures. In G. Gumpert, R. Cathcart, (Eds.), Inter/Media. Interpersonal communication in a media world (pp. 219–252). New York: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (2003). Parasocial breakups: Measuring individual differences in responses to the dissolution of parasocial relationships. Mass Communication and Society, 6, 191–202. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (2004). Parasocial break-up from favorite television characters: The role of attachment styles and relationship intensity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 187–202. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Costa, P. T. , McCrae, R. R. (1989). The NEO PI/FFI manual supplement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Costa, P. T. , McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five Factor Inventory. Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Giles, D. C. (2002). Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology, 4, 279–305. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gleich, U. (1997). Parasoziale Interaktionen und Beziehungen von Fernsehzuschauern mit Personen auf dem Bildschirm: Ein theoretischer und empirischer Beitrag zum Konzept des aktiven Rezipienten [Parasocial interactions and relationships between television viewers and personae on the screen: A theoretical and empirical contribution to the concept of the active media user]. Landau, Germany: Verlag Empirische Pädagogik. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hartmann, T. (2008). Parasocial interaction and paracommunication with new media characters. In E. A. Konijn, S. Utz, M. Tanis, S. B. Barnes, (Eds.), Mediated interpersonal communication (pp. 177–199). New York, London: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hartmann, T. , Klimmt, C. (2005). Ursachen und Effekte parasozialer Interaktionen im Rezeptionsprozess: Eine Fragebogenstudie auf der Basis des PSI-Zwei-Ebenen-Modells [Causes and effects of parasocial interactions in the reception process: A survey on the basis of the Two-Level Model of PSI]. Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie/Journal of Media Psychology, 17, 88–98. First citation in articleAbstract, Google Scholar

  • Hartmann, T. , Schramm, H. (2006). Logik der Forschung zu parasozialen Interaktionen und Beziehungen [The logic of research on parasocial interactions and relationships]. In W. Wirth, A. Fahr, E. Lauf, (Eds.), Forschungslogik und -design in der Kommunikationswissenschaft. Band 2: Anwendungsfelder in der Kommunikationswissenschaft [Logic and design in communication research. Volume 2: Applications in communication research] (pp. 264–291). Cologne, Germany: Halem. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hartmann, T. , Schramm, H. , Klimmt, C. (2004). Personenorientierte Medienrezeption: Ein Zwei-Ebenen-Modell parasozialer Interaktionen [Person-oriented media reception: A Two-Level-Model of parasocial interactions]. Publizistik, 49, 25–47. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hippel, K. (1992). Parasoziale Interaktion. Bericht und Bibliographie [Parasocial interaction. Report and bibliography]. montage AV, 1(1), 135–150. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Horton, D. , Strauss, A. (1957). Interaction in audience-participation shows. The American Journal of Sociology, 62, 579–587. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Horton, D. , Wohl, R. (1956). Mass communication and parasocial interaction: Observation on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19, 215–229. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Klimmt, C. , Hartmann, T. , Schramm, H. (2006). Parasocial interactions and relationships. In J. Bryant, P. Vorderer, (Eds.), Psychology of entertainment (pp. 291–313). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Konijn, E. A. , Hoorn, J. F. (2005). Some like it bad. Testing a model for perceiving and experiencing fictional characters. Media Psychology, 7, 107–144. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rubin, A. M. , Perse, E. M. (1987). Audience activity and soap opera involvement: A uses and effects investigation. Human Communication Research, 14, 246–292. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rubin, A. M. , Perse, E. M. , Powell, R. A. (1985). Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing. Human Communication Research, 12, 155–180. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rubin, R. B. , McHugh, M. P. (1987). Development of parasocial interaction relationships. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 31, 279–292. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schemer, C. (2006). Soziale Vergleiche als Nutzungsmotiv? Überlegungen zur Nutzung von Unterhaltungsangeboten auf der Grundlage der Theorie sozialer Vergleichsprozesse [Are social comparisons motives for media use? What does social comparison theory tell us about the use of entertainment media?]. In W. Wirth, H. Schramm, V. Gehrau, (Eds.), Unterhaltung durch Medien: Theorie und Messung [Entertainment through media. Theory and measurement] (pp. 80–101). Cologne: Halem. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schiappa, E. , Allen, M. , Gregg, P. B. (2006). Parasocial relationships and television: A meta-analysis of the effects. In R. W. Preiss, B. M. Gayle, N. Burrell, M . Allen, J. Bryant, (Eds.), Mass media effects research (pp. 301–314). New York: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schramm, H. (2008). Parasocial interactions and relationships. In W. Donsbach, (Ed.), The Blackwell international encyclopedia of communication (pp. 3501–3506). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schramm, H. , Hartmann, T. (2008). The PSI-Process Scales. A new measure to assess the intensity and breadth of parasocial processes. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, 33, 385–401. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schramm, H. , Hartmann, T. , Klimmt, C. (2002). Desiderata und Perspektiven der Forschung über parasoziale Interaktionen und Beziehungen zu Medienfiguren [Desiderata and perspectives of research on parasocial interactions and relationships with media figures]. Publizistik, 47, 436–459. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vorderer, P. (Ed.). (1996). Fernsehen als Beziehungskiste. Parasoziale Beziehungen und Interaktionen mit TV-Personen [TV as relationship machine: Parasocial relationships and interactions with TV characters] (pp. 153–171). Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Vorderer, P. (1998). Unterhaltung durch Fernsehen: Welche Rolle spielen parasoziale Beziehungen zwischen Zuschauern und Fernsehakteuren? [Entertainment through TV exposure: Which role do parasocial relationships between viewers and TV characters play?]. In G. Roters, W. Klingler, O. Zöllner, (Eds.), Fernsehforschung in Deutschland. Themen, Akteure, Methoden [TV research in Germany. Issues, agents, methods] (pp. 689–707). Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Vorderer, P. , Knobloch, S. (1996). Parasoziale Beziehungen zu Serienfiguren: Ergänzung oder Ersatz? [Parasocial relationships to TV series characters: Completion or replacement?]. Medienpsychologie, 8, 201–216. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Vorderer, P. , Knobloch, S., , Schramm, H. (2001). Does Entertainment suffer from Interactivity? The impact of watching an interactive TV movie on viewers’ experience of entertainment. Media Psychology, 3, 343–363. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar