Abstract
Previous studies have shown that violent video games prime aggressive thoughts and concepts. Interestingly, positively valenced test stimuli are rarely used in this field, though they might provide useful information on the nature of the emotional response to virtual violence and its associative structure. According to the General Aggression Model (GAM) and its extensions (Carnagey, Anderson, & Bushman, 2007), normal negative reactions to violence are expected. Alternatively, playing violent video games might be construed as engaging in positively valenced playful fighting behavior. To test the potential of violent video games to prime positive concepts, N = 29 adult males played either a violent or a nonviolent video game for 20 minutes and were subsequently tested in a standard lexical decision task consisting of positive, aggressive, nonaggressive negative, and neutral target words. The data show that the violent video game primed aggressive concepts as expected, but also raised positive concepts, and did so independently of the participants’ history of playing violent video games. Therefore, the results challenge the idea that violent video games inherently stimulate negative concepts only.
References
2004). A rational look at the emotional Stroop phenomenon: A generic slowdown, not a Stroop effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 323–338.
(2004). An update on the effects of playing violent video games. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 113–122.
(2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 27–51.
(2009). Causal effects of violent sports video games on aggression: Is it competitiveness or violent content? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 731–739.
(2000). Video games and aggressive thoughts, feelings, and behavior in the laboratory and in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 772–790.
(2004). Violent video games: Specific effects of violent content on aggressive thoughts and behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 199–249.
(2006). Chronic violent video game exposure and desensitization to violence: Behavioral and event-related brain potential data. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 532–539.
(1993). Entwurf einer Anwendersprache zur Steuerung psychologischer Reaktionszeitexperimente [
(Outline of a programming language for controlling psychological reaction time experiments ]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.1967). Weapons as aggression-eliciting stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 202–207.
(2009). Violent content enhances video game performance. Journal of Media Psychology, 21, 145–150.
(2007). Nutzen und Risiken von Gewaltcomputerspielen: Gefährliches Trainingswerkzeug, harmlose Freizeitbeschäftigung oder sozial verträglicher Aggressionsabbau? [
(Benefits and risks of violent video games: Dangerous training tool, harmless leisure-time pursuit, or socially acceptable venting of aggression? ] Polizei & Wissenschaft, 1, 45–66.2000). Affective reactions to acoustic stimuli. Psychophysiology, 37, 204–215.
(2006). A theoretical model of the effects and consequences of playing video games. In , Playing video games – Motives, responses, and consequences (pp. 363–378). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
(2001). Is it time to pull the plug on the hostile versus instrumental aggression dichotomy? Psychological Review, 108, 273–279.
(2005). The effects of reward and punishment in violent video games on aggressive affect, cognition, and behavior. Psychological Science, 16, 882–889.
(2007). The effect of video game violence on physiological desensitization to real-life violence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 489–496.
(in press ). Blazing angels or resident evil? Can violent video games be a force for good? Review of General Psychology.2004). Play signaling and the perception of social rules by juvenile chimpanzees (pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 118, 149–159.
B. M. (2009). Game over? The impact of knowledge about violent digital games on the activation of aggression-related concepts. Journal of Media Psychology, 21, 151–160.
(1998). Immortal Kombat: War toys and violent video games. In , Why we watch: The attractions of violent entertainment (pp. 53–68). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2003). Ein Instrument zur Messung der Wirkung emotionaler Valenz auf die Wortverarbeitung. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 211, 129–137.
(2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592.
(2006). Children, adolescents, and media violence: A critical look at the research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
(2006). How players manage moral concerns to make video game violence enjoyable. Communications – the European Journal of Communication Research, 31, 309–328.
(2002). Brutale Spiele(r)? Wirkung und Nutzung von Gewalt in Computerspielen. [
(Brutal game(r)s? Impact and utilization of violence in digital games ]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.2000). From antecedent conditions to violent actions: A general affective aggression model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 533–547.
(2004). Reversing the emotional Stroop effect reveals that it is not what it seems: The role of fast and slow components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 382–392.
(2009). Affective ludology: Scientific measurement of user experience in interactive entertainment. Karlskrona, Sweden: Blekinge Institute of Technology.
(2007). Rough-and-tumble play and the development of the social brain. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 95–98.
(2009). The motivating role of violence in video games. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 243–259.
(2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110, 145–172.
(2003). Emotional expression of young infants and children. Infants and Young Children, 16, 120–142.
(2006). Does playing violent video games induce aggression? Empirical evidence of a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Media Psychology, 8, 39–60.
(