Abstract
Abstract. Media neuroscience has emerged as a new area of study at the intersection of media psychology and cognitive neuroscience. In previous work, we have addressed this trend from a methodological perspective. In this paper, we outline the progression of scholarship in systematic investigations of mass communication phenomena over the past century, from behaviorism and environmental determinism to biological and evolutionary paradigms. These new paradigms are grounded in an emergentist perspective on the nature of psychological processes. We discuss what it means to ask valid research questions in media neuroscience studies and provide recent examples in the areas of interpersonal and intergroup processes, morality, and narratives as well as in persuasion and health communication. We conclude with a selection of innovative methodological avenues that have the potential to accelerate the integration of cognitive neuroscience into media psychology research.
References
(2014). Communication, biology, and physiology: An introduction to the special issue. Communication Monographs, 82(1), 1–3.
(2014). The neuroscience of prejudice and stereotyping. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15, 670–682.
(2006). Brain imaging: A new approach to studying media processes and effects. Media Psychology, 8, 1–6.
(1996). Communication theory. Epistemological foundations. New York: Guilford Press.
(2004). Philosophies and philosophic issues in communication, 1995–2004. Journal of Communication, 54, 589–615.
(2014). Social neuroscience and hyperscanning techniques: Past, present and future. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 44, 76–93.
(2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3(3), 265–299.
(2011). Understanding complexity in the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(5), 200–209.
(2013). Beyond brain mapping: Using the brain to predict real-world outcomes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(1), 45–55.
(2011). Amygdala volume and social network size in humans. Nature Neuroscience, 14(2), 163–164.
(2015). Information flow between interacting human brains: Identification, validation, and relationship to social expertise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(16), 5207–5212.
(1925). The mind and its place in nature. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
(2010).
A historical overview of research in communication science . In C. R. BergerM. E. RoloffD. R. Roskos-EwoldsenEds., The handbook of communication science (pp. 21–36). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.(1996). Why biological explanation? Journal of Communication, 46, 4–7.
(2014). Embodied cognition and mirror neurons: A critical assessment. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 37, 1–15.
(2013).
Health communications: Predicting behavior change from the brain . In P. HallEd., Social neuroscience and public health: foundations of an emerging discipline (pp. 57–61). New York: Springer.(2011). Self-related neural response to tailored smoking-cessation messages predicts quitting. Nature Neuroscience, 14(4), 426–427.
(2009). Neural correlates of message tailoring and self-relatedness in smoking cessation programming. Biological Psychiatry, 65, 165–168.
(2012). Dissociable neural correlates of stereotypes and other forms of semantic knowledge. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(7), 764–770.
(2015). Brain network adaptability across task states. PLoS Computational Biology, 11(1), e1004029.
(2005). Perceptions of moral character modulate the neural systems of reward during the trust game. Nature Neuroscience, 8(11), 1611–1618.
(2010). Neuroimaging: Voodoo, new phrenology, or scientific breakthrough? [Special issue]. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(6).
(2014). The changing misrepresentation of race and crime on network and cable news. Journal of Communication, 65(1), 24–39.
(2014). Audience preferences are predicted by temporal reliability of neural processing. Nature Communications, 5, 45–67.
(1980). An activation model of information exposure. Communication Monographs, 47(4), 295–303.
(2012).
Can neuroscience advance our understanding of core questions in communication studies? An overview of communication neuroscience . In S. JonesEd., Communication at the center (pp. 77–94). New York: Hampton Press.(2012). From neural responses to population behavior: neural focus group predicts population-level media effects. Psychological Science, 23(5), 439–445.
(2010). Predicting persuasion-induced behavior change from the brain. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(25), 8421–8424.
(2011). Neural activity during health messaging predicts reductions in smoking above and beyond self-report. Health Psychology, 30(2), 177–185.
(2015). Neural prediction of communication-relevant outcomes. Communication Methods and Measures, 9(1–2), 30–54.
(2015). Self-affirmation alters the brain’s response to health messages and subsequent behavior change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(7), 1977–1982.
(2009). The neural correlates of persuasion: A common network across cultures and media. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(11), 2447–2459.
(2012). An imaging genetics approach to understanding social influence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 1–13.
(2012). Journey to the edges: Social structures and neural maps of inter-group processes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(1), 1–12.
(2011). Functional and effective connectivity: a review. Brain Connectivity, 1(1), 13–36.
(Eds.), (2014). The cognitive neurosciences (5th ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(2008).
The sacred emergence of nature . In P. ClaytonZ. SimpsonEds., The Oxford handbook of religion and science (pp. 853–871). New York: Oxford University Press.(2012). There is nothing so theoretical as a good method. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(2), 99–108.
(2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York: Pantheon Books.
(2009). Brain basis of human social interaction: from concepts to brain imaging. Physiological Reviews, 89(2), 453–479.
(2006). Dehumanizing the lowest of the low neuroimaging responses to extreme out-groups. Psychological Science, 17(10), 847–853.
(2007). Social groups that elicit disgust are differentially processed in mPFC. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2(1), 45–51.
(2012). Brain-to-brain coupling: a mechanism for creating and sharing a social world. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(2), 114–121.
(2008). Neurocinematics: The neuroscience of film. Projections, 2(1), 1–26.
(2004). Intersubject synchronization of cortical activity during natural vision. Science, 303, 1634–1640.
(2009). Eight problems for the mirror neuron theory of action understanding in monkeys and humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(7), 1229–1243.
(2014). The myth of mirror neurons: The real neuroscience of communication and cognition. New York: Norton.
(2015). Neurocognitive poetics: methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literature reception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 1–22.
(1950). The principles of psychology (Vols. 1–2), Mineola, NY: Dover (Original work published 1890).
(2012). Amygdala response to smoking-cessation messages mediates the effects of serotonin transporter gene variation on quitting. Neuroimage, 60(1), 766–773.
(2012). Neural synchronization during face-to-face communication. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(45), 16064–16069.
(1999). Assessing the decade of the brain. Science, 284(54), 739.
(2010). Functional specificity in the human brain: A window into the functional architecture of the mind. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(25), 11163–11170.
(1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. The Journal of Neuroscience, 17(11), 4302–4311.
(2008). Brain mechanisms of persuasion: how “expert power” modulates memory and attitudes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 3(4), 353–366.
(2012). When good characters do bad things: Examining the effect of moral ambiguity on enjoyment. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 117–135.
(1994). Measuring psychological responses to media. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2009).
The limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing . In R. NabiM. OliverEds., The Sage handbook of media effects and processes (pp. 193–204). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.(2013). Discipline in crisis? The shifting paradigm of mass communication research. Communication Theory, 23(1), 10–24.
(2014). Dynamic human-centered communication systems theory. The Information Society: An International Journal, 30(1), 60–70.
(2008). Understanding the interactive effects of emotional appeal and claim strength in health messages. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(3), 432–447.
(2009). Reduced prefrontal and temporal processing and recall of high “sensation value” ads. Neuroimage, 46(1), 219–225.
(2014). The interaction of affective dispositions, moral judgments, and intentionality in assessing narrative characters: Rationalist and intuitionist sequences. Communication Theory, 24(2), 146–164.
(2008). “They may be pixels, but they’re MY pixels:” developing a metric of character attachment in role-playing video games. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11(4), 515–518.
(2011). The neural bases of social cognition and story comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 103–134.
(2013). The neural dynamics of updating person impressions. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(6), 623–631.
(2003). The cognitive revolution: A historical perspective. Trends in Cognitive Science, 3, 141–144.
(2002). Hyperscanning: Simultaneous fMRI during linked social interactions. NeuroImage, 16(4), 1159–1164.
(2002). The emergence of everything. New York: Oxford University Press.
(2015). Simulating fiction: Individual differences in literature comprehension revealed with fMRI. PloS One, 10(2), e0116492.
(2015). Linking neuroimaging with functional linguistic analysis to understand processes of successful communication. Communication Methods and Measures, 9(1–2), 55–77.
(in press). Big data under the microscope and brains in social context. Integrating methods from computational social science and neuroscience. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 659(1), 274–289.
(2015). Media induced elevation as a means of enhancing feelings of intergroup connectedness. Journal of Social Issues, 71(1), 106–122.
(2012). Inter-subject correlation in fMRI: Method validation against stimulus-model based analysis. PLoS One, 8(8), e41196.
(1986).
The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion . In L. BerkowitzEd., Advances in experimental psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123–205). New York: Academic Press.(2013). Behavioral genetics. New York: Worth.
(2006). Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 59–63.
(2008). The interface between neuroscience and psychological science [Special Issue]. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(2).
(2012). Psychophysiological measurement and meaning: Cognitive and emotional control of media. New York: Routledge.
(2013). Affective and executive network processing associated with persuasive antidrug messages. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(7), 1136–1147.
(2004). Expanding disposition theory: Reconsidering character liking, moral evaluations, and enjoyment. Communication Theory, 14(4), 348–369.
(2004). Contributions of psychophysiology to media research: Review and recommendations. Media Psychology, 6, 193–235.
(1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
(1997). History of communication study. New York: Free Press.
(2005). The parasocial contact hypothesis. Communication Monographs, 72(1), 92–115.
(2004). Media effects theory and the nature/nurture debate: A historical overview and implications for future research. Media Psychology, 6, 83–109.
(2015). The complexity paradigm for studying human communication: A summary and integration of two fields. Review of Communication Research, 3(1), 22–54.
(2006). The neuronal basis and ontogeny of empathy and mind reading: review of literature and implications for future research. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(6), 855–863.
(2009).
Content patterns and effect surrounding sex-role stereotyping on television and film . In J. BryantM. B. OliverEds., Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 342–362). New York: Routledge.(2014). Interindividual synchronization of brain activity during live verbal communication. Behavioural Brain Research, 258, 75–79.
(2010). Speaker-listener neural coupling underlies successful communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(32), 14425–14430.
(2003). Sync: The emerging science of spontaneous order. New York: Hyperion.
(1994). Nonlinear dynamics and chaos: With applications to physics, biology, chemistry, and engineering. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
(2013).
A model of intuitive morality and exemplars . In R. TamboriniEd., Media and the moral mind (pp. 43–74). New York: Routledge.(2008). Evaluating faces on trustworthiness. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124(1), 208–224.
(2009). Understanding others’ actions and goals by mirror and mentalizing systems: a meta-analysis. Neuroimage, 48(3), 564–584.
(1925). Behaviorism. New York: Peoples Institute.
(2015a). Brain, mind, and media: Neuroscience meets media psychology [Introduction to the special issue]. Journal of Media Psychology, 27, 89–92.
(2015b). Biology and brains: Methodological innovations in communication science [Introduction to the special issue]. Communication Methods and Measures, 9(1), 1–4.
(2011). Seeing bad people punished makes us think alike: Social norm violations in television drama elicit cortical synchronization in viewers. Boston, MA: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association.
(2015). Neural predictors of message effectiveness during counterarguing in antidrug campaigns. Communication Monographs, 82(1), 4–30.
(2015). Brain imaging in communication research: A practical guide to understanding and evaluating fMRI studies. Communication Methods and Measures, 9(1–2), 5–29.
(2006). Does playing violent video games induce aggression? Empirical evidence of a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Media Psychology, 8(1), 39–60.
(2008).
The neurophysiological perspective in mass communication research. Theoretical rationale, methods, and applications . In M. J. BeattyJ. C. McCroskeyK. FloydEds., Biological dimensions of communication: Perspectives, methods, and research (pp. 41–71). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.(2013). A multi-level analysis of anti-marijuana public service announcement effectiveness. Communication Monographs, 80(3), 302–330.
(2012).
The neuroanatomical basis of moral cognition and emotion . In R. EbsteinS. Shamay-TsooryS. ChewEds., From DNA to social cognition (pp. 123–138). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.(2006).
Dramaturgy for emotions from fictional narration . In J. BryantP. VordererEds., Psychology of entertainment (pp. 215–238). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
