Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

When They Go Low, We Gloat

How Trait and State Schadenfreude Moderate the Perception and Effect of Negative Political Messages

Published Online:October 30, 2020https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000283

Abstract

Abstract. We investigate whether Schadenfreude – finding pleasure in others’ misfortune – moderates the perception and effects of negative political messages (“negative campaigning”). We present the results of three experiments, two conducted in the United States with samples of 1,722 and 1,408 respondents surveyed via MTurk, and the other conducted in The Netherlands with a sample of 143 undergraduate students. In all studies respondents were exposed to a positive or negative message on a given issue and asked afterward to evaluate the message (message perception) and the target of the message (effect of the message). Studies 1 and 2 tested for the moderating effect of “trait” Schadenfreude – that is, to what extent respondents are likely to experience Schadenfreude in their everyday life, whereas Study 3 tested for the effects of “state” Schadenfreude via a stimulus intended to elicit it as a reaction. Results show that (1) Schadenfreude moderates the perception of the negative messages; people with low trait Schadenfreude react strongly (and negatively) to attacks; (2) state Schadenfreude does not have as strong an effect as trait Schadenfreude; (3) Schadenfreude only marginally moderates the direct effect of the negative message on the evaluation of the target politician.

References

  • Ansolabehere, S., & Iyengar, S. (1995). Going negative: How attack ads shrink and polarize the electorate, Free Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bakker, B. N., & Lelkes, Y. (2018). Selling ourselves short? How abbreviated measures of personality change the way we think about personality and politics. The Journal of Politics, 80(4), 1311–1325. https://doi.org/10.1086/698928 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpr057 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brader, T. (2005). Striking a responsive chord: How political ads motivate and persuade voters by appealing to emotions. American Journal of Political Science, 49(2), 388–405. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Casler, K., Bickel, L., & Hackett, E. (2013). Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon’s MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2156–2160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.009 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cikara, M. (2015). Intergroup Schadenfreude: Motivating participation in collective violence. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 3, 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2014.12.007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Feather, N. T., & Nairn, K. (2005). Resentment, envy, Schadenfreude, and sympathy: Effects of own and other’s deserved or undeserved status. Australian Journal of Psychology, 57(2), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530500048672 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fridkin, K. L., & Kenney, P. (2011). Variability in citizens’ reactions to different types of negative campaigns. American Journal of Political Science, 55(2), 307–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00494.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Geer, J. G. (2006). In defense of negativity: Attack ads in presidential campaigns, University of Chicago Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gerstlé, J., & Nai, A. (2019). Negativity, emotionality and populist rhetoric in election campaigns worldwide, and their effects on media attention and electoral success. European Journal of Communication, 34(4), 410–444. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323119861875 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Greenier, K. D. (2018). The relationship between personality and Schadenfreude in hypothetical versus live situations. Psychological Reports, 121(3), 445–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294117745562 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hauser, D. J., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 400–407. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0578-z First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • James, S., Kavanagh, P. S., Jonason, P. K., Chonody, J. M., & Scrutton, H. E. (2014). The Dark Triad, Schadenfreude, and sensational interests: Dark personalities, dark emotions, and dark behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 68, 211–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.04.020 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2010). The dirty dozen: A concise measure of the dark triad. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019265 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lau, R. R., & Pomper, G. M. (2001). Negative campaigning by US senate candidates. Party Politics, 7(1), 69–87. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lau, R. R., & Pomper, G. M. (2004). Negative campaigning: An analysis of U.S. senate elections, Rowman & Littlefield. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lau, R. R., Sigelman, L., & Rovner, I. B. (2007). The effects of negative political campaigns: A meta-analytic reassessment. Journal of Politics, 69, 1176–1209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00618.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Leach, C. W., Spears, R., Branscombe, N. R., & Doosje, B. (2003). Malicious pleasure: Schadenfreude at the suffering of another group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 932–943. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.932 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marcus, G. E., Neuman, R., & MacKuen, M. B. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment, The University of Chicago Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Morewedge, C. K. (2009). Negativity bias in attribution of external agency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(4), 535–545. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016796 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Muddiman, A. R., & Stroud, N. J. (2017). News values, cognitive biases, and partisan incivility in comment sections. Journal of Communication, 67(4), 586–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12312 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mutz, D. C. (2015). In-your-face politics: The consequences of uncivil media, Princeton University Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nai, A.Walter, A. S. (Eds.). (2015). New perspectives on negative campaigning. Why attack politics matters, ECPR Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 867–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Porter, S., Bhanwer, A., Woodworth, M., & Black, P. J. (2014). Soldiers of misfortune: An examination of the Dark Triad and the experience of Schadenfreude. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 64–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.11.014 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Roese, N. J., & Sande, G. N. (1993). Backlash effects in attack politics. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(8), 632–653. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01106.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image, Princeton University Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schneider, F. M., Otto, L., Alings, D., & Schmitt, M. (2014). Measuring traits and states in public opinion research: A latent state–trait analysis of political efficacy. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 26(2), 202–223. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edu002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schumpe, B. M., & Lafrenière, M. A. K. (2016). Malicious joy: Sadism moderates the relationship between Schadenfreude and the severity of others’ misfortune. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 32–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sigelman, L., & Kugler, M. (2003). Why is research on the effects of negative campaigning so inconclusive? Understanding citizens’ perceptions of negativity. The Journal of Politics, 65, 142–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.t01-1-00007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Spielberger, C. D. (1983). Manual for the State–Trait Anxiety Inventory: STAI (Form Y), Consulting Psychologists Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tang, J., & Gibson, S. J. (2005). A psychophysical evaluation of the relationship between trait anxiety, pain perception, and induced state anxiety. The Journal of Pain, 6(9), 612–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2005.03.009 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Thorson, E., Ognianova, E., Coyle, J., & Denton, F. (2000). Negative political ads and negative citizen orientations toward politics. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 22(1), 13–40. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Valentino, N. A., Brader, T., Groenendyk, E. W., Gregorowicz, K., & Hutchings, V. L. (2011). Election night’s alright for fighting: The role of emotions in political participation. The Journal of Politics, 73(1), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381610000939 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Van Dijk, W. W., Goslinga, S., & Ouwerkerk, J. W. (2008). Impact of responsibility for a misfortune on Schadenfreude and sympathy: Further evidence. The Journal of Social Psychology, 148(5), 631–636. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.148.5.631-636 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Van Dijk, W. W., Ouwerkerk, J. W., Goslinga, S., Nieweg, M., & Gallucci, M. (2006). When people fall from grace: Reconsidering the role of envy in Schadenfreude. Emotion, 19(6), 156–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.6.1.156 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Van Dijk, W. W., van Koningsbruggen, G. M., Ouwerkerk, J. W., & Wesseling, Y. M. (2011). Self-esteem, self-affirmation, and Schadenfreude. Emotion, 11(3), 1445–1449. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026331 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Verhulsdonk, I., Nai, A., & Karp, J. (2020). Are political attacks a laughing matter? Three experiments on political humor and the effectiveness of negative political messages. Unpublished manuscript. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Weinschenk, A. C., & Panagopoulos, C. (2014). Personality, negativity, and political participation. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 2(1), 164–182. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v2i1.280 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wilcox, C., Sigelman, L., & Cook, E. (1989). Some like it hot: Individual differences in responses to group feeling thermometers. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53(2), 246–257. https://doi.org/10.1086/269505 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Yoon, K., Pinkleton, B. E., & Ko, W. (2005). Effects of negative political advertising on voting intention: An exploration of the roles of involvement and source credibility in the development of voter cynicism. Journal of Marketing Communications, 11(2), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2018.32 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar