Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Actor–Observer Asymmetry in Virtual Reality

Published Online:May 01, 2023https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000380

Abstract

Abstract: Actors and observers attend to different aspects of behavior, leading them to interpret the same event in distinct ways. Virtual reality technology enables users to easily switch their visual perspective and modify an avatar to represent users’ own or another’s identity. We conducted a pilot study (n = 69) and a pre-registered main study (n = 101) manipulating visual perspective and avatar identity to investigate their impacts on actor–observer asymmetry. We designed a ball-tossing game in an immersive virtual environment as a test case. Actor–observer differences were captured from four dimensions: participants’ engagement with the virtual event, behavior explanations, behavior evaluations, and perceived agency. Results showed that visual perspective was an important factor influencing people’s virtual experience. Viewing events from the first-person visual perspective increased event engagement indicated by greater self-presence in the virtual world and self-avatar merging. Participants with the third-person visual perspective judged avatar behavior more intentional and used more subjective reasons to explain it. People embodied in an avatar that resembled the self had more positive evaluations of the avatar’s behavior than those embodied in a stranger avatar. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of actor–observer asymmetry in virtual reality.

References

  • Aguirre-Rodriguez, A., Bóveda-Lambie, A. M., & Miniard, P. W. (2015). The impact of consumer avatars in Internet retailing on self-congruity with brands. Marketing Letters, 26(4), 631–641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-014-9296-z First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ahn, S. J., & Bailenson, J. N. (2011). Self-endorsing versus other-endorsing in virtual environments. Journal of Advertising, 40(2), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367400207 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Alicke, M. D. (1985). Global self-evaluation as determined by the desirability and controllability of trait adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(6), 1621–1630. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.6.1621 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ames, D. R. (2004a). Inside the mind reader’s tool kit: Projection and stereotyping in mental state inference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(3), 340–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.340 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ames, D. R. (2004b). Strategies for social inference: A similarity contingency model of projection and stereotyping in attribute prevalence estimates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5), 573–585. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.573 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596–612. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Aymerich-Franch, L., Kizilcec, R. F., & Bailenson, J. N. (2014). The relationship between virtual self similarity and social anxiety. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, Article 944. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00944 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Behm-Morawitz, E. (2013). Mirrored selves: The influence of self-presence in a virtual world on health, appearance, and well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.023 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Biocca, F. (1997). The cyborg’s dilemma: Progressive embodiment in virtual environments. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2), Article JCMC324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00070.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication & Society, 4(3), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • De Rooij, A., Van Der Land, S., & Van Erp, S. (2017, June). The creative Proteus Effect: How self-similarity, embodiment, and priming of creative stereotypes with avatars influences creative ideation. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition (pp. 232–236). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3059454.3078856 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Downs, E., Bowman, N. D., & Banks, J. (2019). A polythetic model of player-avatar identification: Synthesizing multiple mechanisms. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 8(3), 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000170 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Epley, N., Keysar, B., Van Boven, L., & Gilovich, T. (2004). Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(3), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.327 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Foster, E. D., & Deardorff, A. (2017). Open science framework (OSF). Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(2), 203–206. https://osf.io/2m4kr First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fox, J., & Bailenson, J. N. (2009). Virtual self-modeling: The effects of vicarious reinforcement and identification on exercise behaviors. Media Psychology, 12(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260802669474 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fox, J., Bailenson, J., & Binney, J. (2009). Virtual experiences, physical behaviors: The effect of presence on imitation of an eating avatar. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 18(4), 294–303. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.18.4.294 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Frank, M. G., & Gilovich, T. (1989). Effect of memory perspective on retrospective causal attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(3), 399–403. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.3.399 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Galinsky, A. D., Ku, G., & Wang, C. S. (2005). Perspective-taking and self-other overlap: Fostering social bonds and facilitating social coordination. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8(2), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430205051060 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gilovich, T., Medvec, V. H., & Savitsky, K. (2000). The spotlight effect in social judgment: An egocentric bias in estimates of the salience of one’s own actions and appearance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.211 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gisbergen, M. S. V., Sensagir, I., & Relouw, J. (2020). How real do you see yourself in VR? The effect of user-avatar resemblance on virtual reality experiences and behaviour. In T. JungM. C. tom DieckP. A. RauschnabelEds., Augmented reality and virtual reality (pp. 401–409). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37869-1_32 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365027700400406 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Harris, P. (1996). Sufficient grounds for optimism? The relationship between perceived controllability and optimistic bias. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 15, 9–52. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1996.15.1.9 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Heeter, C. (1992). Being there: The subjective experience of presence. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 1(2), 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1992.1.2.262 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hoeken, H., Kolthoff, M., & Sanders, J. (2016). Story perspective and character similarity as drivers of identification and narrative persuasion. Human Communication Research, 42(2), 292–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12076 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • IJsselsteijn, W. A., Freeman, J., & De Ridder, H. (2001). Presence: Where are we? Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 4(2), 179–182. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493101300117875 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jo, D., Kim, K., Welch, G. F., Jeon, W., Kim, Y., Kim, K. H., & Kim, G. J. (2017, November). The impact of avatar-owner visual similarity on body ownership in immersive virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (pp. 1–2). https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3139131.3141214 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jones, E. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (1971). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In E. E. JonesD. E. KanouseH. H. KelleyR. E. NisbettS. ValinsB. WeinerEds., Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 79–94). General Learning. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830190308 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Klimmt, C., Hefner, D., Vorderer, P., Roth, C., & Blake, C. (2010). Identification with video game characters as automatic shift of self-perceptions. Media Psychology, 13(4), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2010.524911 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Klein, C. T. F., & Helweg-Larsen, M. (2002). Perceived control and the optimistic bias: A meta-analytic review. Psychology and Health, 17, 437–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/0887044022000004920 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kalckert, A., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2012). Moving a rubber hand that feels like your own: A dissociation of ownership and agency. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, Article 40. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00040 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Krebs, D. (1975). Empathy and altruism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(6), 1134–1146. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.32.6.1134 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lee, K. M. (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 14(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00302.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Libby, L. K., Shaeffer, E. M., & Eibach, R. P. (2009). Seeing meaning in action: A bidirectional link between visual perspective and action identification level. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(4), 503–516. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016795 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lim, S., & Reeves, B. (2009). Being in the game: Effects of avatar choice and point of view on psychophysiological responses during play. Media Psychology, 12(4), 348–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260903287242 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Malle, B. F. (1999). How people explain behavior: A new theoretical framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(1), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0301_2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Malle, B. F. (2014). A coding scheme for folk explanations of behavior (version 4.5.7). http://research.clps.brown.edu/SocCogSci/CodingSchemes.html First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Malle, B. F., & Knobe, J. (1997). The folk concept of intentionality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(2), 101–121. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1996.1314 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mori, M., MacDorman, K., & Kageki, N. (2012). The uncanny valley [from the field]. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 19(2), 98–100. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Moyer-Gusé, E., & Nabi, R. L. (2010). Explaining the effects of narrative in an entertainment television program: Overcoming resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research, 36(1), 26–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01367.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nigro, G., & Neisser, U. (1983). Point of view in personal memories. Cognitive Psychology, 15(4), 467–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(83)90016-6 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action. In R. J. DavidsonG. E. SchwartzD. ShapiroEds., Consciousness and self-regulation (Vol. 4 pp. 1–18). Plenum. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ogawa, N., Narumi, T., Kuzuoka, H., & Hirose, M. (2020, April). Do you feel like passing through walls? Effect of self-avatar appearance on facilitating realistic behavior in virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (1–14). https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3313831.3376562 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Peng, W. (2008). The mediational role of identification in the relationship between experience mode and self-efficacy: Enactive role-playing versus passive observation. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(6), 649–652. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0229 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ratan, R. (2013). Self-presence, explicated: Body, emotion, and identity extension into the virtual self. In R. LuppiciniEd., Handbook of research on technoself: Identity in a technological society (pp. 322–336). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2211-1.ch018 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Seyama, J. I., & Nagayama, R. S. (2007). The uncanny valley: Effect of realism on the impression of artificial human faces. Presence, 16(4), 337–351. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.16.4.337 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Storms, M. D. (1973). Videotape and the attribution process: Reversing actors’ and observers’ points of view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27(2), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034782 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sun, Y., Pandita, S., Shaikh, O., Kim, B., & Won, A. S. (2018). Personalized avatars and self-presence. In 2018 International Society for Presence Research Annual Conference (pp. 1–29). ISPR. https://virtualembodimentlab.files.wordpress.com/2019/02/avatar_customization_presence2018_camera_ready.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sutin, A. R., & Robins, R. W. (2008). When the “I” looks at the “me”: Autobiographical memory, visual perspective, and the self. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(4), 1386–1397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.09.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Talarico, J. M., LaBar, K. S., & Rubin, D. C. (2004). Emotional intensity predicts autobiographical memory experience. Memory & Cognition, 32(7), 1118–1132. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196886 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Taylor, S. E., & Fiske, S. T. (1975). Point of view and perceptions of causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(3), 439–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077095 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Williams, E. F., & Gilovich, T. (2008). Do people really believe they are above average? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(4), 1121–1128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.01.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Van Boven, L., Loewenstein, G., Dunning, D., & Nordgren, L. F. (2013). Changing places: A dual judgment model of empathy gaps in emotional perspective taking. In J. M. OlsonM. P. ZannaEds., Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 48, pp. 117–171). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407188-9.00003-X First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Van Der Heide, B., Schumaker, E. M., Peterson, A. M., & Jones, E. B. (2012). The Proteus effect in dyadic communication: Examining the effect of avatar appearance in computer-mediated dyadic interaction. Communication Research, 40(6), 838–860. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212438097 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Waltemate, T., Gall, D., Roth, D., Botsch, M., & Latoschik, M. E. (2018). The impact of avatar personalization and immersion on virtual body ownership, presence, and emotional response. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 24(4), 1643–1652. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2794629 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Yee, N., & Bailenson, J. (2007). The Proteus effect: The effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Human Communication Research, 33(3), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00299.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zhou, S. (2020). Using virtual reality to promote physical activity. Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, 13, 312–326. https://doi.org/10.4236/jsea.2020.1311021 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zhou, S., & Shapiro, M. A. (2017). Reducing resistance to narrative persuasion about binge drinking: The role of self-activation and habitual drinking behavior. Health Communication, 32(10), 1297–1309. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1219931 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zhou, V. S., & Won, A. S. (2023a, February 8). Pre-registration of: “Visual perspectives and avatar identity on behavioral explanations in virtual reality”. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2M4KR First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zhou, V. S., & Won, A. S. (2023b, February 8) Data for: “Visual Perspectives and Avatar Identity on Behavioral Explanations in Virtual Reality”. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/EFXJZ First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zlatev, J.Racine, T. P.Sinha, C.Itkonen, E. (Eds.). (2008). The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity (Vol. 12). John Benjamins Publishing. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar