Actor–Observer Asymmetry in Virtual Reality
Abstract
Abstract: Actors and observers attend to different aspects of behavior, leading them to interpret the same event in distinct ways. Virtual reality technology enables users to easily switch their visual perspective and modify an avatar to represent users’ own or another’s identity. We conducted a pilot study (n = 69) and a pre-registered main study (n = 101) manipulating visual perspective and avatar identity to investigate their impacts on actor–observer asymmetry. We designed a ball-tossing game in an immersive virtual environment as a test case. Actor–observer differences were captured from four dimensions: participants’ engagement with the virtual event, behavior explanations, behavior evaluations, and perceived agency. Results showed that visual perspective was an important factor influencing people’s virtual experience. Viewing events from the first-person visual perspective increased event engagement indicated by greater self-presence in the virtual world and self-avatar merging. Participants with the third-person visual perspective judged avatar behavior more intentional and used more subjective reasons to explain it. People embodied in an avatar that resembled the self had more positive evaluations of the avatar’s behavior than those embodied in a stranger avatar. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of actor–observer asymmetry in virtual reality.
References
2015). The impact of consumer avatars in Internet retailing on self-congruity with brands. Marketing Letters, 26(4), 631–641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-014-9296-z
(2011). Self-endorsing versus other-endorsing in virtual environments. Journal of Advertising, 40(2), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367400207
(1985). Global self-evaluation as determined by the desirability and controllability of trait adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(6), 1621–1630. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.6.1621
(2004a). Inside the mind reader’s tool kit: Projection and stereotyping in mental state inference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(3), 340–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.340
(2004b). Strategies for social inference: A similarity contingency model of projection and stereotyping in attribute prevalence estimates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5), 573–585. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.573
(1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596–612. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
(2014). The relationship between virtual self similarity and social anxiety. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, Article
(944 . https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.009442013). Mirrored selves: The influence of self-presence in a virtual world on health, appearance, and well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.023
(1997). The cyborg’s dilemma: Progressive embodiment in virtual environments. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2), Article
(JCMC324 . https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00070.x2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication & Society, 4(3), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01
(2017, June). The creative Proteus Effect: How self-similarity, embodiment, and priming of creative stereotypes with avatars influences creative ideation. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition (pp. 232–236). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3059454.3078856
(2019). A polythetic model of player-avatar identification: Synthesizing multiple mechanisms. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 8(3), 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000170
(2004). Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(3), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.327
(2017). Open science framework (OSF). Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(2), 203–206. https://osf.io/2m4kr
(2009). Virtual self-modeling: The effects of vicarious reinforcement and identification on exercise behaviors. Media Psychology, 12(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260802669474
(2009). Virtual experiences, physical behaviors: The effect of presence on imitation of an eating avatar. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 18(4), 294–303. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.18.4.294
(1989). Effect of memory perspective on retrospective causal attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(3), 399–403. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.3.399
(2005). Perspective-taking and self-other overlap: Fostering social bonds and facilitating social coordination. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8(2), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430205051060
(2000). The spotlight effect in social judgment: An egocentric bias in estimates of the salience of one’s own actions and appearance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.211
(2020).
(How real do you see yourself in VR? The effect of user-avatar resemblance on virtual reality experiences and behaviour . In T. JungM. C. tom DieckP. A. RauschnabelEds., Augmented reality and virtual reality (pp. 401–409). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37869-1_321974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365027700400406
(1996). Sufficient grounds for optimism? The relationship between perceived controllability and optimistic bias. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 15, 9–52. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1996.15.1.9
(1992). Being there: The subjective experience of presence. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 1(2), 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1992.1.2.262
(2016). Story perspective and character similarity as drivers of identification and narrative persuasion. Human Communication Research, 42(2), 292–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12076
(2001). Presence: Where are we? Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 4(2), 179–182. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493101300117875
(2017, November). The impact of avatar-owner visual similarity on body ownership in immersive virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (pp. 1–2). https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3139131.3141214
(1971).
(The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior . In E. E. JonesD. E. KanouseH. H. KelleyR. E. NisbettS. ValinsB. WeinerEds., Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 79–94). General Learning. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.38301903082010). Identification with video game characters as automatic shift of self-perceptions. Media Psychology, 13(4), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2010.524911
(2002). Perceived control and the optimistic bias: A meta-analytic review. Psychology and Health, 17, 437–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/0887044022000004920
(2012). Moving a rubber hand that feels like your own: A dissociation of ownership and agency. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, Article
(40 . https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.000401975). Empathy and altruism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(6), 1134–1146. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.32.6.1134
(2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 14(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00302.x
(2009). Seeing meaning in action: A bidirectional link between visual perspective and action identification level. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(4), 503–516. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016795
(2009). Being in the game: Effects of avatar choice and point of view on psychophysiological responses during play. Media Psychology, 12(4), 348–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260903287242
(1999). How people explain behavior: A new theoretical framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(1), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0301_2
(2014). A coding scheme for folk explanations of behavior (version 4.5.7). http://research.clps.brown.edu/SocCogSci/CodingSchemes.html
(1997). The folk concept of intentionality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(2), 101–121. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1996.1314
(2012). The uncanny valley [from the field]. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 19(2), 98–100. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811
(2010). Explaining the effects of narrative in an entertainment television program: Overcoming resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research, 36(1), 26–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01367.x
(1983). Point of view in personal memories. Cognitive Psychology, 15(4), 467–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(83)90016-6
(1986).
(Attention to action . In R. J. DavidsonG. E. SchwartzD. ShapiroEds., Consciousness and self-regulation (Vol. 4 pp. 1–18). Plenum.2020, April). Do you feel like passing through walls? Effect of self-avatar appearance on facilitating realistic behavior in virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (1–14). https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3313831.3376562
(2008). The mediational role of identification in the relationship between experience mode and self-efficacy: Enactive role-playing versus passive observation. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(6), 649–652. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0229
(2013).
(Self-presence, explicated: Body, emotion, and identity extension into the virtual self . In R. LuppiciniEd., Handbook of research on technoself: Identity in a technological society (pp. 322–336). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2211-1.ch0182007). The uncanny valley: Effect of realism on the impression of artificial human faces. Presence, 16(4), 337–351. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.16.4.337
(1973). Videotape and the attribution process: Reversing actors’ and observers’ points of view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27(2), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034782
(2018). Personalized avatars and self-presence. In 2018 International Society for Presence Research Annual Conference (pp. 1–29). ISPR. https://virtualembodimentlab.files.wordpress.com/2019/02/avatar_customization_presence2018_camera_ready.pdf
(2008). When the “I” looks at the “me”: Autobiographical memory, visual perspective, and the self. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(4), 1386–1397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.09.001
(2004). Emotional intensity predicts autobiographical memory experience. Memory & Cognition, 32(7), 1118–1132. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196886
(1975). Point of view and perceptions of causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(3), 439–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077095
(2008). Do people really believe they are above average? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(4), 1121–1128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.01.002
(2013).
(Changing places: A dual judgment model of empathy gaps in emotional perspective taking . In J. M. OlsonM. P. ZannaEds., Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 48, pp. 117–171). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407188-9.00003-X2012). The Proteus effect in dyadic communication: Examining the effect of avatar appearance in computer-mediated dyadic interaction. Communication Research, 40(6), 838–860. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212438097
(2018). The impact of avatar personalization and immersion on virtual body ownership, presence, and emotional response. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 24(4), 1643–1652. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2794629
(2007). The Proteus effect: The effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Human Communication Research, 33(3), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00299.x
(2020). Using virtual reality to promote physical activity. Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, 13, 312–326. https://doi.org/10.4236/jsea.2020.1311021
(2017). Reducing resistance to narrative persuasion about binge drinking: The role of self-activation and habitual drinking behavior. Health Communication, 32(10), 1297–1309. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1219931
(2023a, February 8). Pre-registration of: “Visual perspectives and avatar identity on behavioral explanations in virtual reality”. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2M4KR
(2023b, February 8) Data for: “Visual Perspectives and Avatar Identity on Behavioral Explanations in Virtual Reality”. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/EFXJZ
(Zlatev, J.Racine, T. P.Sinha, C.Itkonen, E. (Eds.). (2008). The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity (Vol. 12). John Benjamins Publishing.