The Effects of Status on Perceived Warmth and Competence
Malleability of the Relationship Between Status and Stereotype Content
Abstract
Research has shown that perceived group status positively predicts competence stereotypes but does not positively predict warmth stereotypes. The present study identified circumstances in which group status positively predicts both warmth and competence judgments. Students (N = 86) rated one of two groups (psychologists vs. engineers) presented as either being low or high in social status on warmth and competence. Results showed that status positively predicted competence stereotypes for both groups, but warmth stereotypes only for psychologists, for whom warmth traits are perceived to be functional in goal achievement. Moreover, for psychologists perceived warmth mediated the relationship between status and perceived competence. Results are discussed in terms of the contextual malleability of the relationship between perceived status, warmth, and competence.
References
2008). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1063–1065.
(1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
(2002). Construction of status and referential structures. Sociological Theory, 20, 157–179.
(2005). The effect of status on sociability and competence stereotypical dimensions. Psicothema, 17, 297–302.
(2009). Social structure shapes cultural stereotypes and emotions: A causal test of the Stereotype Content Model. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 12, 147–155.
(1996). Status, communality, and agency: Implications for stereotypes of gender and other groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 25–38.
(2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 631–648.
(2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. In , Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 61–149). San Diego: Academic Press.
(2009). Stereotype content model holds across cultures: Toward universal similarities and some differences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 1–33.
(2005). What is the problem? Prejudice as an attitude-in-context. In , On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 19–35). Oxford: Blackwell.
(2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573–598.
(1984). Gender stereotypes and attitudes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735–754.
(1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621–628.
(2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77–83.
(2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902.
(1999). (Dis)respecting versus (Dis)liking: Status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warmth. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 473–489.
(1991). Trait-based and sex-based discrimination in occupational prestige, occupational salary, and hiring. Sex Roles, 25, 351–378.
(1995). Images of occupations: Components of gender and status in occupational stereotypes. Sex Roles, 32, 565–582.
(2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498–509.
(2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 899–913.
(2003). Complementary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823–837.
(2005). Stereotype content model explains prejudice for an envied outgroup: Scale of anti-Asian American stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 34–47.
(1997). Competence and morality dimensions of national and ethnic stereotypes: A study in six eastern-European countries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 703–723.
(1999). In-group favoritism and the reflection of realistic dimensions of difference between national states in Central and Eastern European nationality stereotypes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 85–102.
(2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731.
(2008). The role of valence in the perception of agency and communion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1073–1082.
(1986). Prototype of a profession: Psychology’s public image. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 17, 5–9.
(