A New Measure of the Revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory
Factor Structure and Validity of the rRST Questionnaire in the PATH Through Life Project
Abstract
Abstract. The reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) proposes that neurobiological systems mediate behavior and their functioning can be associated with personality. The functions and associations of RST systems were revised into fight–flight–freeze system (FFFS), behavioral approach/activation system (rBAS), and behavioral inhibition system (rBIS); however, there is limited study of the revised systems due to lack of validated measures. We investigated scale structure, sex invariance, and psychometric properties of the revised RST questionnaire (rRST-Q). The rRST-Q showed good fit as a 5-factor structure with free interfactor correlations and was sex invariant, and associations with personality and mental health measures were consistent with theory and literature. The rRST-Q is a reliable measure, and its use will help understand the link between brain, personality, and behavior.
References
2012). Cohort profile: The PATH through life project. International Journal of Epidemiology, 41(4), 951–960. 10.1093/ije/dyr025
, , , (2002). Stability of the Eysenck personality questionnaire for a cross-sectional sample. Psychologial Reports, 90(2), 546–548. 10.2466/pr0.2002.90.2.546
(2009). Psychometric evaluation of the behavioral inhibition/behavioral activation system scales and the sensitivity to punishment and sensitivity to reward questionnaire in a sample of eating disordered patients. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(5), 407–412. 10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.007
(1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
(1993). Defense system psychopharmacology: An ethological approach to the pharmacology of fear and anxiety. Behavioural Brain Research, 58(1), 155–165. 10.1016/0166-4328(93)90100-5
(1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 319–333. 10.1037//0022-3514.67.2.319
(2007). The behavioural inhibition system and behavioural approach system (BIS/BAS) Scales: Measurement and structural invariance across adults and adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(2), 295–305. 10.1016/j.paid.2006.11.023
(2004). Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 28(3), 317–332. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.01.005
(Corr, P. J. (Ed.). (2008). The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality. Cambridge University Press. https://go.exlibris.link/z1ty1fJH
2016). The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality questionnaire (RST-PQ): Development and validation. Psychological Assessment, 28(11), 1427–1440. 10.1037/pas0000273
(2013). Motivation and personality: A neuropsychological perspective. Social and Personality Psychology compass, 7(3), 158–175. 10.1111/spc3.12016
(2006). The role of theory in the psychophysiology of personality: From Ivan Pavlov to Jeffrey Gray. International Journal of Psychophysiology 62(3), 367–376. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.01.005
(1995). Personality and reinforcement in associative and instrumental learning. Personality and Individual Differences, 19(1), 47–71. 10.1016/0191-8869(95)00013-V
(2006). Age changes in personality and their origins: Comment on Roberts, Walton, and Viechtbauer (2006). Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 26–28. 10.1037/003-2909.132.1.26
(2011). The neurobiology of anhedonia and other reward-related deficits. Trends in Neurosciences, 35(1), 68–77. 10.1016/j.tins.2011.11.005
(2021). Bridging classical and revised reinforcement sensitivity theory research: A longitudinal analysis of a large population study. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 737117. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.737117
(2020). Volumetric brain differences in clinical depression in association with anxiety: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, 45(5), 190156. 10.1503/jpn.190156
(1985). A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 6(1), 21–29. 10.1016/0191-8869(85)90026-1
(2012). Exploratory factor analysis. Oxford University Press.
(1988). Detecting anxiety and depression in general medical settings. BMJ, 297(6653), 897–899. 10.1136/bmj.297.6653.897
(1970). The psychophysiological basis of introversion-extraversion. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 8(3), 249–266. 10.1016/0005-7967(70)90069-0
(1982). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. Oxford University Press.
(2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
(2008). An evaluation of the relationship between Gray's revised RST and Eysenck's PEN: Distinguishing BIS and FFFS in Carver and White's BIS/BAS scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(8), 709–715. 10.1016/j.paid.2008.07.013
(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. 10.1080/10705519909540118
(2009). Jackson-5 scales of revised reinforcement sensitivity theory (r-RST) and their application to dysfunctional real world outcomes. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(4), 556–569. 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.02.007
(2003). BIS/BAS levels and psychiatric disorder: An epidemiological study. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 25(1), 25–36. 10.1023/A:1022247919288
(1971). Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika, 36(4), 409–426. 10.1007/BF02291366
(1999). Using the BIS/BAS scales to measure behavioural inhibition and behavioural activation: Factor structure, validity and norms in a large community sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 26(1), 49–58. 10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00143-3
(2018). Predicting physical and mental health symptoms: Additive and interactive effects of difficulty identifying feelings, neuroticism and extraversion. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 115, 14–23. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2018.10.003
(2018). A comparison of reinforcement sensitivity theory measures: Unique associations with social interaction anxiety and social observation anxiety. Assessment, 25(5), 627–639. 10.1177/1073191116654003
(2016). Five reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) of personality questionnaires: Comparison, validity and generalization. Personality and Individual Differences, 97, 19–24. 10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.012
(2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 936–949. 10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7
(1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525–543. 10.1007/bf02294825
(2004). Assessing factorial invariance in ordered-categorical measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(3), 479–515. 10.1207/S15327906MBR3903_4
(2005). Minimum sample size recommendations for conducting factor analyses. International Journal of Testing, 5(2), 159–168. 10.1207/s15327574ijt0502_4
(2016). Revising the BIS/BAS Scale to study development: Measurement invariance and normative effects of age and sex from childhood through adulthood. Psychological Assessment, 28(4), 429–442. 10.1037/pas0000186
(1999). The neuroscience of personality. In L. A. PervinO. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
(2008). Psychometric properties of Carver and White's (1994) BIS/BAS scales in a large sample of offenders. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(8), 732–737. 10.1016/j.paid.2008.07.021
(2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 3.6.0). R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
. (2006). The reactive-proactive aggression questionnaire: Differential correlates of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent boys. Aggressive Behavior, 32(2), 159–171. 10.1002/ab.20115
(2015). A new measure for the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory: Psychometric criteria and genetic validation. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 9, Article 38. 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00038
(2018). Procedures for personality and psychological research (Version 1.8.12). Northwestern University. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
(2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36.
(2006). Love, work, and changes in extraversion and neuroticism over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(6), 1152–1165. 10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1152
(2014). Validation of the measure of revised reinforcement sensitivity theory constructs. Journal of Individual Differences, 35(1), 12–21. 10.1027/1614-0001/a000121
(2006). Conceptual distinctions among Carver and White's (1994) BAS scales: A reward-reactivity versus trait impulsivity perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(5), 1039–1050. 10.1016/j.paid.2005.10.012
(2006). The new reinforcement sensitivity theory: Implications for personality measurement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(4), 320–335. 10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_3
(2017). Multidimensional measurement invariance in an international context: Fit measure performance with many groups. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48(7), 991–1008. 10.1177/0022022117717028
(2019). Multiple-group invariance with categorical outcomes using updated guidelines: An illustration using Mplus and the lavaan/semTools packages. Structural Equation Modeling, 27(1), 111–130. 10.1080/10705511.2019.1602776
(2010). Regional brain volume in depression and anxiety disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67(10), 1002–1011. 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.121
(2011). Behavioral approach system moderates the prospective association between the behavioral inhibition system and alcohol outcomes in college students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 72(6), 1028–1036. 10.15288/jsad.2011.72.1028
(2020). Acquiescent responding can distort the factor structure of the BIS/BAS scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 152, 109563. 10.1016/j.paid.2019.109563
(2011). Sex differences in the neural correlates of emotion: Evidence from neuroimaging. Biological Psychology, 87(3), 319–333. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.05.003
(2012). Age group differences and longitudinal changes in approach–avoidance sensitivity: Findings from an 8-year longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(6), 646–654. 10.1016/j.jrp.2012.07.002
(1964). A fear survey schedule for use in behaviour therapy. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2(1), 27–30. 10.1016/0005-7967(64)90051-8
(2017). Depression and other common mental disorders: Global health estimates (WHO/MSD/MER/2017.2). World Health Organization
. (2016). Identification of confirmatory factor analysis models of different levels of invariance for ordered categorical outcomes. Psychometrika, 81(4), 1014–1045. 10.1007/s11336-016-9506-0
(2011). Psychometric characteristics of Carver and White's BIS/BAS scales in Dutch adolescents and their mothers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(5), 500–507. 10.1080/00223891.2011.595745
(