A New Measure of the Revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory

We would like to thank A. Jorm, H. Christensen, B. Rodgers, S. Easteal, K. Anstey, A. Mackinnon, T. McKetin, R, L. Leach, T. Slade, P. McNamee, T. Jacomb, K. Maxwell, and the PATH team and participants for their contribution to the research.

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

This study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of our institution.

Daniela A. Espinoza Oyarce: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software (R), Formal analysis, Data curation, Writing – Original draft, Visualization; Richard Burns: Methodology, Writing – Review & editing; Peter Butterworth: Methodology, Writing – Review & editing; Nicholas Cherbuin: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – Review & editing, Supervision.

The corresponding author had full access to all the data in this study, and all authors had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. The materials and code used for this study can be found in the supplement. The PATH study governance arrangements and the commitments made to participants do not allow for unrestricted sharing of research data due to ethical considerations, but we will be happy to make the analysed data available to external parties after formal request to, and approval from, the PATH Research Committee. Requests to access the data should be directed to Prof Nicolas Cherbuin ([email protected]). All other requests should be directed to [email protected].