Skip to main content
Original Article

Shared Leadership and Team Performance in a Business Strategy Simulation

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000021

This study examined the relations between shared leadership in teams, team trust, potency, and performance. Forty-nine teams participating in a business simulation game rated their team potency, trust, and team leadership styles. Team potency and trust were positively related to shared transformational leadership and negatively related to passive avoidant leadership, but only the latter was significantly negatively related to team performance in the business strategy simulation. These results suggest that teams might not always benefit from transformational leadership qualities, but that “negative” leadership styles might be detrimental to performance and to the trust and confidence in the team.

References

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2005). Amos (version 6.0) [Computer Program]. Chicago, IL: SPSS. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Arnold, K. A. , Barling, J. , Kelloway, E. K. (2001). Transformational leadership or the iron cage: Which predicts trust, commitment and team efficacy? Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 22, 315–320. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Atwater, L. E. , Camobreco, J. F. , Dionne, S. D. , Avolio, B. J. , Lau, A. N. (1997). Effects of rewards and punishments on leader charisma, leader effectiveness and follower reactions. The Leadership Quarterly, 8, 133–152. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Avolio, B. J. (1999). Full leadership development: Building the vital forces in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Avolio, B. J. , Bass, B. M. , & Jung, D. I. (1999). Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 441–462. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Avolio, B. J. , Sivasubramaniam, N. , Murry, W. D. , Jung, D. , & Garger, W. (2003). Assessing shared leadership: Development and preliminary validation of a Team Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. In C. L. Pearce, J. A. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York, NY: Free Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industrial, military, and educational impact. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bass, B. M. , Avolio, B. J. , Jung, D. I. , & Berson, Y. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 207–218. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bligh, M. C. , Pearce, C. L. , Kohles, J. C. (2006). The importance of self- and shared leadership in team based knowledge work: A meso-level model of leadership dynamics. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 296–318. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carson, J. B. , Tesluk, P. E. , Marrone, J. A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1217–1234. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Clegg, C. W. , Wall, T. D. (1981). A note on some new scales for measuring aspects of psychological well-being at work. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 54, 221–225. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, S. G. , Ledford, G. E. , Spreitzer, G. M. (1996). A predictive model of self-managing work team effectiveness. Human Relations, 49, 643–676. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cook, J. , Wall, T. (1980). New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfillment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53, 39–52. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Day, D. V. , Gronn, P. , Salas, E. (2004). Leadership capacity in teams. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 857–880. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Den Hartog, D. N. , Van Muijen, J. J. , Koopman, P. (1997). Transactional versus transformational leadership: An analysis of the MLQ. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70, 19–35. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dirks, K. T. (1999). The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 445–455. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dirks, K. T. (2000). Trust in leadership and team performance: Evidence from NCAA basketball. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 1004–1012. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ensley, M. D. , Hmieleski, K. M. , Pearce, C. L. (2006). The importance of vertical and shared leadership within new venture top management teams: Implications for the performance of startups. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 217–231. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gully, S. M. , Incalcaterra, K. A. , Joshi, A. , Beaubien, J. M. (2002). A meta-analysis of team efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 819–832. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Guzzo, R. A. (1986). Group decision making and group effectiveness in organizations. In P. S. Goodman (Ed.), Designing effective work groups (pp. 34–71). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Guzzo, R. A. , Yost, P. R. , Campbell, R. J. , Shea, G. P. (1993). Potency in groups: Articulating a construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 87–106. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hackman, J. R. (1990). Groups that work (and those that don’t). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hackman, J. R. (1998). Why teams don’t work. In R. S. Tindale (Ed.), Theory and research on small groups: Social psychological applications to social issues (Vol. 4, pp. 245–267). New York, NY: Plenum Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hetland, H. , Sandal, G. M. , Johnsen, T. B. (2008). Followers’ personality and leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 14, 322–331. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • James, L. R. , Demaree, R. G. , Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85–98. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jarvenpaa, S. L. , Leidner, D. E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10, 791–815. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jones, G. R. , George, J. M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. The Academy of Management Review, 23, 531–546. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Judge, T. A. , Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 755–768. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Klein, K. J. , Bliese, P. D. , Kozlowski, S. W. J. , Dansereau, F. , Gavin, M. B. , Griffin, M. A. , …, Bligh, M. C. (2000). Multilevel analytical techniques: Commonalities, differences, and continuing questions. In K. J. Klein, S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 512–553). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kozlowski, S. W. J. , Gully, S. M. , McHugh, P. P. , Salas, E. , Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1996). A dynamic theory of leadership and team effectiveness: Development and task contingent leader roles. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human research management, Vol. 14, Greenwich, CT: JAI. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Meyerson, D. , Weick, K. E. , Kramer, R. M. (1996). Swift trust and temporary groups. In R. M. Kramer, T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 166–195). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pearce, C. L. , Gallagher, C. A. , Ensley, M. D. (2002). Confidence at the group level of analysis: A longitudinal investigation of the relationship between potency and team effectiveness. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 115–119. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pearce, C. L. , Sims, H. P. (2002). Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dynamics, 6, 172–197. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Podsakoff, P. M. , MacKenzie, S. B. , Bommer, W. H. (1996). Transformational leader behaviors and substitutes for leadership as determinants of employee satisfaction, commitment, trust, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 22, 259–298. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Podasakoff, P. M. , MacKenzie, S. B. , Lee, J.-Y. , Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Salas, E. , Fiore, S. M. (2004). Why team cognition?. In E. Salas, S. M. Fiore (Eds.), Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance (pp. 3–9). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schaubroeck, J. , Lam, S. S. , Cha, S. E. (2007). Embracing transformational leadership: Team values and the impact of leader behavior on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1020–1030. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shamir, B. , House, R. J. , Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4, 577–594. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sivasubramaniam, N. , Murry, W. D. , Avolio, B. J. , Jung, D. I. (2002). A longitudinal model of the effects of team leadership and group potency on group performance. Group & Organization Management, 27, 66–96. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Solansky, S. T. (2008). Leadership style and team processes in self-managed teams. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 14, 332–341. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stewart, G. L. (2006). A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management, 32, 29–54. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stewart, G. L. , Barrick, M. R. (2000). Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 135–148. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thompson, A. A. J. , Stappenbeck, G. J. (2002). The business strategy game (7th ed.). Toronto, ON: McGraw-Hill Irwin. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zantow, K. , Knowlton, D. S. , Sharp, D. C. (2005). More than fun and games: Reconsidering the virtues of strategic management simulations. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4, 451–458. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar