Knowledge Contribution in Organizations via Social Media
The Interplay of Identification and Perceived Usefulness
Abstract
Abstract. Knowledge exchange via social media is crucial for organizational success. Yet, many employees only read others’ contributions without actively contributing their knowledge. We thus examined predictors of the willingness to contribute knowledge. Applying social identity theory and expectancy theory to knowledge exchange, we investigated the interplay of users’ identification with their organization and perceived usefulness of a social media tool. In two studies, identification facilitated users’ willingness to contribute knowledge – provided that the social media tool seemed useful (vs. not-useful). Interestingly, identification also raised the importance of acquiring knowledge collectively, which could in turn compensate for low usefulness of the tool. Hence, considering both social and media factors is crucial to enhance employees’ willingness to share knowledge via social media.
References
(2007). Antecedents and consequences of online social interactions. Media Psychology, 9, 77–114. doi: 10.1080/15213260709336804
(2015). Introducing social media for knowledge management: Determinants of employees’ intentions to adopt new tools. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 290–296. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.069
(1986). Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 543–549. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.543
(2013). Evolution of the networked enterprise: McKinsey Global Survey results. Retrieved from http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/business-technology/our-insights/evolution-of-the-networked-enterprise-mckinsey-global-survey-results
(2013). Why do we blog? From the perspectives of technology acceptance and media choice factors. Behaviour and Information Technology, 32, 371–386. doi: 10.1080/0144929x.2012.656326
(1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982–1003. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
(1999). Social identification effects in social dilemmas: A transformation of motives. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 871–893. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199911)29:7<871::AID-EJSP962>3.0.CO;2-I
(2001). Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 42–51. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.42
(2003). Using theory to design effective health behavior interventions. Communication Theory, 13, 164–183. doi: 10.1093/ct/13.2.164
(2004). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach (2nd ed.). London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: Guilford.
(2003). Motivation of software developers in open source projects: An Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel. Research Policy, 32, 1159–1177. doi: 10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00047-7
(1989). Intragroup identification and intergroup differentiation: A multicomponent approach. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 305–317. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1989.tb00874.x
(2002). Motivations to resolve communication dilemmas in database-mediated collaboration. Communication Research, 29, 125–154. doi: 10.1177/0093650202029002002
(2005). Group-based emotions as determinants of ingroup identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 677–685. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.01.001
(2008). The social psychology of knowledge management. Team Performance Management, 14, 381–401. doi: 10.1108/13527590810912340
(2007). Pizza and pop and the student identity: The role of referent group norms in healthy and unhealthy eating. Journal of Social Psychology, 147, 57–74. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.147.1.57-74
(1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103–123. doi: 10.1002/job.4030130202
(2014). Motivational factors of information exchange in social information spaces. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 549–558. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.044
(2015). Social media: A contextual framework to guide research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1653–1677. doi: 10.1037/a0039244s
(2012). Understanding the factors that influence the adoption and meaningful use of social media by physicians to share medical information. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14, 210–220. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2138
(2000). When the going gets tough, the tough get going: Social identification and individual effort in intergroup competition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1550–1559. doi: 10.1177/01461672002612009
(2002). The benefits of being disadvantaged: Performance-related circumstances and consequences of intergroup comparisons. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 73–91. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.62
(2013). Arbeit 3.0. Arbeiten in der digitalen Welt. Retrieved from http://www.bitkom.org/files/documents/Studie_Arbeit_3.0.pdf
(1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531–544. doi: 10.1177/014920638601200408
(2009). The reader-to-leader framework: motivating technology-mediated social participation. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 1, 13–32.
(2007). Applying common Identity and bond theory to design of online communities. Organization Studies, 28, 377–408. doi: 10.1177/0170840607076007
(2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 358–384. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2004.05.005
(2002). Common bond and common identity groups on the Internet: Attachment and normative behavior in on-topic and off-topic chats. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 27–37. doi: 10.1037/1089-2699.6.1.27
(2011). The impact of discrepancies from ingroup norms on group members’ well-being and motivation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 886–897. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.833
(2002). Mediation in experimental and non-experimental studies: New processes and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445.
(2010). Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 456–476. doi: 10.1177/1094428109351241
(1979).
An integrative theory of intergroup conflict . In W. G. AustinS. WorchelEds., The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.(1986).
The social identity theory of intergroup behavior . In S. WorchelW. AustinEds., Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.(2012). Newcomer Conformity – How self-construal affects the alignment of cognition and behavior with group goals in novel groups. Social Psychology, 43, 138–147. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000092
(2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity theory, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349–361. doi: 10.1177/1368430201004003003
(2000). Foci and correlates of organizational identification. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 137–147. doi: 10.1348/096317900166949
(2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46, 186–204.
(2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425–478.
(1964). Work and motivation. New York, NY: Wiley.
(2015). Showing engagement or not: The influence of social identification and group deadlines on individual control strategies. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 18, 24–44. doi: 10.1177/1368430214542254
