Centralization and Effectiveness of Reward Management in Multinational Enterprises
Perceptions of HQ and Subsidiary Reward Managers
Abstract
Abstract. Based on responses from 158 reward managers located at the headquarters or subsidiaries of multinational enterprises, the present study examines the relationship between the centralization of reward management decision making and its perceived effectiveness in multinational enterprises. Our results show that headquarters managers perceive a centralized approach as being more effective, while for subsidiary managers this relationship is moderated by the manager’s role identity. Referring to social identity theory, the present study enriches the standardization versus localization debate through a new perspective focusing on psychological processes, thereby indicating the importance of in-group favoritism in headquarters and the influence of subsidiary managers’ role identities on reward management decision making.
References
2014). Shaping the future research agenda for compensation and benefits management: Some thoughts based on a stakeholder inquiry. Human Resource Management Review, 24, 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2013.08.011
(1985). Roles and responsibilities of the subsidiary manager: MNC operations from the national organization’s perspective. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
(2000). Consequences of perception gaps in the headquarters-subsidiary relationship. International Business Review, 9, 321–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-5931(00)00004-4
(2007). Transferring HR practices within multinational corporations. Human Resource Management Journal, 17, 320–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2007.00048.x
(2011). Between universality and contingency. International Journal of Manpower, 32, 856–878. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437721111181642
(2014). Headquarters’ managerial intentionality and reverse transfer of practices. Management International Review, 54, 225–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-013-0192-1
(2005). International HRM: national business systems, organizational politics and the international division of labour in MNCs. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/0958519042000295920
(2008).
(The global convergence of compensation practices . In L. R. Gomez-MejiaS. WernerEds., Global compensation (pp. 131–141). Oxford, UK: Routledge.2011). HRM structures and subsidiary discretion in foreign multinationals in the UK. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22, 483–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.543628
(2007). Strategic issues and local constraints in transnational compensation strategies: an analysis of cultural, institutional and political influences. European Management Journal, 25, 118–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2007.01.001
(2012). Transfer of employment practices, varieties of capitalism and national employment systems. A review. The German Journal of Industrial Relations, 19, 236–252. https://doi.org/10.1688/1862-0035_IndB_2012_02_Iseke
(1998). Are financial incentives related to performance? A meta-analytic review of empirical research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 777–787. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.5.777
(1994). Do cultural differences make a business difference? Contextual factors affecting cross-cultural relationship success. The Journal of Management Development, 13, 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621719410050219
(2012). The dilemma facing multinational enterprises: Transfer or adaptation of their human resource management systems. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23, 1788–1807. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.610940
(2015). Changing patterns of compensation and benefits in multinational and Australian companies 1996–2009. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 53, 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12040
(2016). Compensation (12th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
(2003). Multinationals and human resource management: Between global convergence and national identity. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14, 363–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/0958519022000031799
(1994). Influences on human resource management practices in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 25, 229–251. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490199
(2008). Foreign subsidiary perspectives on the mechanisms of global HRM integration. Human Resource Management Journal, 18, 135–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2007.00064.x
(2013). Examining the differential use of global integration mechanisms across HRM practices: Evidence from China. Journal of World Business, 48, 232–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2012.07.007
(2017). Globalizing human resource management (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Routledge.
(1968). Identity salience and role performance: The relevance of symbolic interaction theory for family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 30, 558–564. https://doi.org/10.2307/349494
(1979).
(An integrative theory of intergroup conflict . In W. G. AustinS. WorchelEds., The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.2015). International human resource management: Policies and practices for multinational enterprises. New York, NY: Routledge.
(1979). Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favouritism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420090207
(2007). A model of dual organizational identification in the context of the multinational enterprise. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 327–350. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.422
(2011). Paying both globally and locally: An examination of the compensation management of a US multinational finance firm in the Asia Pacific Region. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22, 3867–3887. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.610972
(2014). Chinese MNCs’ preparation for host‐country labor relations: An exploration of country-of-origin effect. Human Resource Management Journal, 53, 947–965. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21613
(