Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Employee Status and the Consequences of Perceived Organizational Support

Published Online:March 21, 2018https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000198

Abstract

Abstract. Incorporating organizational support and status theory, this study examines whether employees’ status moderates both the relationship between perceived organizational support (POS) and affective organizational commitment (AOC) as well as POS-AOS-job performance relationships. Based on two studies using different types of status measures (i.e., objective and subjective), our findings demonstrate that both the POS-AOC relationship and the entire mediation process were moderated by employee status such that low-status employees showed a greater improvement in effects. This study represents a novel attempt to clarify the critical role of individual status, which has largely been neglected in the field of I/O psychology and organizational behavior, in the complex mechanism of POS and subsequent outcomes.

References

  • Aquino, K., Grover, S. L., Bradfield, M. & Allen, D. G. (1999). The effects of negative affectivity, hierarchical status, and self-determination on workplace victimization. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 260–272. https://doi.org/10.2307/256918 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Berger, J., Cohen, B. P. & Zelditch, M. (1972). Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 37, 241–255. https://doi.org/10.2307/2093465 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York, NY: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bommer, W. H., Rich, G. A. & Rubin, R. S. (2005). Changing attitudes about change: Longitudinal effects of transformational leader behavior on employee cynicism about organizational change. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 733–753. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.342 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bunderson, J. S. (2003). Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristics perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 557–591. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556637 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Casimir, G., Ng, Y. N. K., Wang, K. Y. & Ooi, G. (2014). The relationships amongst leader-member exchange, perceived organizational support, affective commitment, and in-role performance: A social-exchange perspective. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 35, 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-04-2012-0054 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Djurdjevic, E., Stoverink, A. C., Klotz, A. C., Koopman, J., da Motta Veiga, S. P., Yam, K. C. & Chiang, J. T.-J. (2017). Workplace status: The development and validation of a scale. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102, 1124–1147. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000202 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Driskell, J. E. & Salas, E. (1991). Group decision making under stress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 473–478. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.3.473 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eisenberger, R., Cummings, J., Armeli, S. & Lynch, P. (1997). Perceived organizational support, discretionary treatment, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 812–820. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.5.812 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S. & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I. L. & Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 565–573. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.56 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hofstede, G. (2003). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Huang, J. L., Curran, P. G., Keeney, J., Poposki, E. M. & DeShon, R. P. (2012). Detecting and deterring insufficient effort responding to surveys. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27, 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-011-9231-8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kawai, N. & Strange, R. (2014). Perceived organizational support and expatriate performance: Understanding a mediated model. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25, 2438–2462. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2014.884615 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kim, K. Y., Eisenberger, R. & Baik, K. (2016). Perceived organizational support and affective organizational commitment: Moderating influence of perceived organizational competence. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37, 558–583. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2081 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kurtessis, J. N., Eisenberger, R., Ford, M. T., Buffardi, L. C., Stewart, K. A. & Adis, C. S. (2017). Perceived organizational support: A meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. Journal of Management, 43, 1854–1884. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315575554 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lavelle, J. J., Rupp, D. E. & Brockner, J. (2007). Taking a multifoci approach to the study of justice, social exchange, and citizenship behavior: The target similarity model. Journal of Management, 33, 841–866. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307307635 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lee, J. & Peccei, R. (2007). Perceived organizational support and affective commitment: The mediating role of organization‐based self‐esteem in the context of job insecurity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 661–685. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.431 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Luthans, F., McCaul, H. S. & Dodd, N. G. (1985). Organizational commitment: A comparison of American, Japanese, and Korean employees. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 213–219. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/256069 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Magee, J. C. & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). 8 social hierarchy: The self‐reinforcing nature of power and status. The Academy of Management Annals, 2, 351–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520802211628 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J. & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 538–551. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.538 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pearce, J. L. & Xu, Q. J. (2012). Rating performance or contesting status: Evidence against the homophily explanation for supervisor demographic skew in performance ratings. Organization Science, 23, 373–385. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0585 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Piazza, A. & Castellucci, F. (2014). Status in organization and management theory. Journal of Management, 40, 287–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313498904 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H. & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 1, 107–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rhoades, L. & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 698–714. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ridgeway, C. L. (2013). Why status matters for inequality. American Sociological Review, 79, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122413515997 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sheets, V. L. & Braver, S. L. (1995). Organizational status and perceived sexual harassment: Detecting the mediators of a null effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1159–1171. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672992512009 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Van Dyne, L. & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 108–119. https://doi.org/10.2307/256902 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Williams, L. J. & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700305 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar