Abstract
Abstract. Faking models assume that characteristics of applicants as well as contextual factors determine whether applicants intend to fake. However, previous research on faking in interviews mainly investigated applicants’ characteristics while research on contextual factors is largely missing. Accordingly, we examined the influence of two such factors – attractiveness of the organization and competition among applicants – on the intention to fake in an interview. We conducted a vignette study with a 2 × 2 between-subjects design in which we varied competition and attractiveness. We found that attractiveness influenced faking intentions. However, we found no effect for competition. Accordingly, interviewers should be aware that applicants are more prone to faking when they want to get access to attractive organizations.
References
2017). Zur Lage der Psychologie
([The state of psychology] . Psychologische Rundschau, 68, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a0003461991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978%2891%2990020-T
(2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471–499. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164939
(1982). The influence of corporate image and specificity of candidate qualifications on response to recruitment advertisement. Journal of Management, 8, 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638200800107
(2017). Editorial: Impression management and faking in job interviews. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01294
(2005). Applicant attraction to organizations and job choice: A meta-analytic review of the correlates of recruiting outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 928–944. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.928
(2017, April). Faking in assessment centers: Using the theory of planned behavior. Paper presented at the 32nd annual conference of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL
(2012).
(People fake only when they need to fake . In M. ZieglerC. MacCannR. D. RobertsEds., New perspectives on faking in personality assessment (pp. 19–33). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.2011). Understanding faking behavior through the lens of motivation: An application of VIE theory. Human Performance, 24, 322–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2011.597477
(2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.41.4.1149
(2013, May). When the going gets rough…fake it: Unemployment and applicant deception. Paper presented at the 16th congress of the European Association of Work and Organizational Psychology, Münster, Germany.
(2015). Shall we continue or stop disapproving of self-presentation? Evidence on impression management and faking in a selection context and their relation to job performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24, 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2014.915215
(2006). A model of faking likelihood in the employment interview. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14, 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2006.00353.x
(2007). Measuring faking in the employment interview: Development and validation of an interview faking behavior scale. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1638–1656. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1638
(2016, March 20). Retrieved from http://www.psystudents.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Deutschland_Master-Psychologie-in-Deutschland-2016-mit-Fristen_Version_1.0.pdf
. (2009). “Faking” from the applicant’s perspective: A theory of self-presentation in personnel selection settings. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17, 417–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2009.00483.x
(2000). Variance in faking across noncognitive measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 812–821. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.812
(1998). The effects of social desirability and faking on personality and integrity assessment for personnel selection. Human Performance, 11, 245–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.1998.9668033
(2011). Effects of an economic recession on leader personality and general mental ability scores. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 19, 183–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2011.00545.x
(2016). When winning is everything: The relationship between competitive worldviews and job applicant faking. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 65, 643–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12072
(2016). A dynamic model of applicant faking. Organizational Psychology Review, 6, 145–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386615580875
(1964). Work and motivation. New York, NY: Wiley.
(2016). How and why do interviewers try to make impressions on applicants? A qualitative study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 313–332. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000046
(