Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Research Note

Using the Theory of Planned Behavior to Predict Faking in Selection Exercises Varying in Fidelity

Published Online:September 20, 2018https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000211

Abstract

Abstract. Faking has been a concern in selection research for many years. Many studies have examined faking in questionnaires while far less is known about faking in selection exercises with higher fidelity. This study applies the theory of planned behavior (TPB; Ajzen, 1991) to low- (interviews) and high-fidelity (role play, group discussion) exercises, testing whether the TPB predicts reported faking behavior. Data from a mock selection procedure suggests that candidates do report to fake in low- and high-fidelity exercises. Additionally, the TPB showed good predictive validity for faking in a low-fidelity exercise, yet not for faking in high-fidelity exercises.

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Alliger, G. M. & Dwight, S. A. (2000). A meta-analytic investigation of the susceptibility of integrity tests to faking and coaching. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640021970367 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Beck, L. & Ajzen, I. (1991). Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 25, 285–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(91)90021-H First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • DePaulo, B. M. (1992). Nonverbal behavior and self-presentation. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 203–243. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.203 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • DePaulo, B. M., Kashy, D. A., Kirkendol, S. E., Wyer, M. M. & Epstein, J. A. (1996). Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 979–995. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.979 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eurich, T. L., Krause, D. E., Cigularov, K. & Thornton, G. C. (2009). Assessment centers: Current practices in the United States. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24, 387–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-009-9123-3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Feldman, R. S., Forrest, J. A. & Happ, B. R. (2002). Self-presentation and verbal deception: Do self-presenters lie more? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24, 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324834BASP2402_8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Griffith, R. L., Chmielowski, T. & Yoshita, Y. (2007). Do applicants fake? An examination of the frequency of applicant faking behavior. Personnel Review, 36, 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480710731310 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Klehe, U.-C., Kleinmann, M., Nieß, C. & Grazi, J. (2014). Impression management behavior in assessment centers: Artificial behavior or much ado about nothing? Human Performance, 27, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2013.854365 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lester, C., Anglim, J. & Fullarton, C. (2015). Individual differences in intention to fake job interviews: Personality, self-monitoring, and the theory of planned behaviour. Australasian Journal of Organisational Psychology, 8, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1017/orp. 2015.7 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Levashina, J. & Campion, M. A. (2007). Measuring faking in the employment interview: Development and validation of an interview faking behavior scale. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1638–1656. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1638 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lievens, F. & DeSoete, B. (2012). Simulations. In N. SchmittEd., The Oxford handbook of personnel assessment and selection (pp. 383–410). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McFarland, L. A. & Ryan, A. M. (2006). Toward an integrated model of applicant faking behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 979–1016. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00052.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McFarland, L. A., Ryan, A. M. & Kriska, D. S. (2003). Impression management use and effectiveness across assessment methods. Journal of Management, 29, 641–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00030-8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McFarland, L. A., Yun, G., Harold, C. M., Viera, L. & Moore, L. G. (2005). An examination of impression management use and effectiveness across assessment center exercises: The role of competency demands. Personnel Psychology, 58, 949–980. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00374.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mueller-Hanson, R. A., Heggestad, E. D. & Thornton, G. C. (2006). Individual differences in impression management: An exploration of the psychological processes underlying faking. Psychology Science, 48, 288–312. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Niessen, A. S. M., Meijer, R. R. & Tendeiro, J. N. (2017). Measuring non-cognitive predictors in high-stakes contexts: The effect of self-presentation on self-report instruments used in admission to higher education. Personality and Individual Differences, 106, 183–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.11.014 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Roulin, N., Bangerter, A. & Levashina, J. (2014). Interviewers’ perceptions of impression management in employment interviews. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29, 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-10-2012-0295 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Weiss, B. & Feldman, R. S. (2006). Looking good and lying to do it: Deception as an impression management strategy in job interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 36, 1070–1086. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00055.x First citation in articleGoogle Scholar