Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Who Speaks Up?

Motivational Configurations of Personality Traits to Voice Behavior

Published Online:October 20, 2021https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000289

Abstract

Abstract. Research on the relationship between personality traits and employee voice has predominantly focused on main effects of one or more traits and has shown equivocal results. In this study, we explore relationships between configurations (i.e., all logically possible combinations) of the Big Five traits and promotive and prohibitive voice using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Survey data from 171 employees from 10 organizations in the service industry revealed that none of the traits alone could induce promotive or prohibitive voice. Yet, we found three trait configurations that relate to promotive voice and four configurations that relate to prohibitive voice. We use the theory of purposeful work behavior to explain the different trait configurations for promotive and prohibitive voice.

References

  • Aryee, S., Walumbwa, F. O., Mondejar, R., & Chu, C. W. L. (2017). Core self-evaluations and employee voice behavior: Test of a dual-motivational pathway. Journal of Management, 43(3), 946–966. 10.1177/0149206314546192 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Li, N. (2013). The theory of purposeful work behavior: The role of personality, higher-order goals, and job characteristics. Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 132–153. 10.5465/amr.2010.0479 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bashshur, M. R., & Oc, B. (2014). When voice matters: A multilevel review of the impact of voice in organizations. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1530–1554. 10.1177/0149206314558302 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Beus, J. M., Dhanani, L. Y., & McCord, M. A. (2015). A meta-analysis of personality and workplace safety: Addressing unanswered questions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(2), 481–498. 10.1037/a0037916 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Blickle, G., Meurs, J. A., Wihler, A., Ewen, C., Plies, A., & Günther, S. (2013). The interactive effects of conscientiousness, openness to experience, and political skill on job performance in complex jobs: The importance of context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(8), 1145–1164. 10.1002/job.1843 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In H. C. TriandisJ. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of crosscultural psychology (Vol. 2. Methodology, pp. 389–444). Allyn & Bacon. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, J. D. (2011). Understanding the better than average effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(2), 209–219. 10.1177/0146167211432763 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chamberlin, M., Newton, D. W., & Lepine, J. A. (2017). A meta-analysis of voice and its promotive and prohibitive forms: Identification of key associations, distinctions, and future research directions. Personnel Psychology, 70(1), 11–71. 10.1111/peps.12185 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Choi, D., Oh, I.-S., & Colbert, A. E. (2015). Understanding organizational commitment: A meta-analytic examination of the roles of the five-factor model of personality and culture. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(5), 1542–1567. 10.1037/apl0000014 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cooper, B., & Glaesser, J. (2016). Exploring the robustness of set theoretic findings from a large n fsQCA: An illustration from the sociology of education. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19(4), 445–459. 10.1080/13645579.2015.1033799 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Crant, J. M., Kim, T.-Y., & Wang, J. (2011). Dispositional antecedents of demonstration and usefulness of voice behavior. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(3), 285–297. 10.1007/s10869-010-9197-y First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dul, J. (2016). Identifying single necessary conditions with NCA and fsQCA. Journal of Business Research, 69(4), 1516–1523. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.134 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Duşa, A. (2018). QCA with R: A comprehensive resource. Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978-3-319-75668-4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Edmondson, A. C. (2003). Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1419–1452. 10.1111/1467-6486.00386 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Emmenegger, P., Schraff, D., & Walter, A. (2014, November). QCA, the truth table analysis and large-N survey data: The benefits of calibration and the importance of robustness tests. 2nd International QCA Expert Workshop, Zurich, Switzerland. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420. 10.5465/amj.2011.60263120 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Foulk, T. A., Lanaj, K., & Krishnan, S. (2019). The virtuous cycle of daily motivation: Effects of daily strivings on work behaviors, need satisfaction, and next-day strivings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(6), 755–775. 10.1037/apl0000385 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 513–524. 10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.513 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Greckhamer, T., Misangyi, V. F., Elms, H., & Lacey, R. (2008). Using qualitative comparative analysis in strategic management research: An examination of combinations of industry, corporate, and business-unit effects. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 695–726. 10.1177/1094428107302907 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hills, P., & Argyle, M. (2001). Emotional stability as a major dimension of happiness. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(8), 1357–1364. 10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00229-4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory (Versions 4a and 54). University of California. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kim, Y., & Verweij, S. (2016). Two effective causal paths that explain the adoption of US state environmental justice policy. Policy Sciences, 49(4), 505–523. 10.1007/s11077-016-9249-x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • King, E. B., George, J. M., & Hebl, M. R. (2005). Linking personality to helping behaviors at work: An interactional perspective. Journal of Personality, 73(3), 585–608. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00322.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lepine, J. A., Colquitt, J. A., & Erez, A. (2000). Adaptability to changing task contexts: Effects of general cognitive ability, conscientiousness, and openness to experience. Personnel Psychology, 53(3), 563–593. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00214.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (2001). Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: Evidence of differential relationships with Big Five personality characteristics and cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(2), 326–336. 10.1037/0021-9010.86.2.326 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Li, Y., & Ahlstrom, D. (2016). Emotional stability: A new construct and its implications for individual behavior in organizations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(1), 1–28. 10.1007/s10490-015-9423-2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Liang, J., Farh, C. I. C., & Farh, J.-L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 71–92. 10.5465/AMJ.2010.0176 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81–90. 10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A five-factor theory perspective. Guilford Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Meuer, J., Rupietta, C., & Backes-Gellner, U. (2015). Layers of co-existing innovation systems. Research Policy, 44(4), 888–910. 10.1016/j.respol.2015.01.013 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mohsen, K., & Eng, T.-Y. (2016). The antecedents of cross-functional coordination and their implications for marketing adaptiveness. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5946–5955. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.05.007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Moon, H. (2001). The two faces of conscientiousness: Duty and achievement striving in escalation of commitment dilemmas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 533–540. 10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.535 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 373–412. 10.5465/19416520.2011.574506 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Morrison, E. W. (2014). Employee voice and silence. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 173–197. 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091328 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nettle, D. (2006). The evolution of personality variation in humans and other animals. American Psychologist, 61(6), 622–631. 10.1037/0003-066X.61.6.622 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ragin, C. C. (2006). Set relations in social research: Evaluating their consistency and coverage. Political Analysis, 14(3), 291–310. 10.1093/pan/mpj019 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ragin, C. C. (2009). Qualitative comparative analysis using fuzzy sets (fsQCA). In B. RihouxC. C. Ragin (Eds.), Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques (pp. 87–122). Sage. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ridgeway, C. L. (1978). Conformity, group-oriented motivation, and status attainment in small groups. Social Psychology, 41(3), 175–188. 10.2307/3033555 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C. C. (2009). Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques. Sage. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tett, R. P., & Guterman, H. A. (2000). Situation trait relevance, trait expression, and cross-situational consistency: Testing a principle of trait activation. Journal of Research in Personality, 34(4), 397–423. 10.1006/jrpe.2000.2292 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vaughn, L. A., Baumann, J., & Klemann, C. (2008). Openness to experience and regulatory focus: Evidence of motivation from fit. Journal of Researchdel in Personality, 42(4), 886–894. 10.1016/j.jrp.2007.11.008 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Weiss, M., & Morrison, E. W. (2019). Speaking up and moving up: How voice can enhance employees' social status. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(1), 5–19. 10.1002/job.2262 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • White, L., Lockett, A., Currie, G., & Hayton, J. (2020). Hybrid context, management practices and organizational performance: A configurational approach. Journal of Management Studies, 58(3), 718–748. 10.1111/joms.12609 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Witt, L. A. (2002). The interactive effects of extraversion and conscientiousness on performance. Journal of Management, 28(6), 835–851. 10.1177/014920630202800607 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Witt, L. A., Burke, L. A., Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (2002). The interactive effects of conscientiousness and agreeableness on job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 164–169. 10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.164 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Woodside, A. G. (2013). Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: Calling for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory. Journal of Business Research, 66(4), 463–472. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.12.021 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar