Agreeable Supervisors Promoting the Organization – Implications for Employee Commitment and Retention
Abstract
Abstract. Through two studies, we examine the importance of supervisor promotion of the organization (SPO) for employee commitment and retention. Study 1 (N = 910) found SPO to be distinguishable from supervisor’s organizational embodiment, perceived supervisor support, perceived organizational support, and supervisor vision and to interact with perceived supervisor agreeableness to predict employee affective commitment. Using time-lagged data, Study 2 (N = 272) found SPO to be indirectly related to turnover via employee affective commitment and this relation to be stronger at high perceived supervisor agreeableness. These findings indicate that SPO can help reduce employee turnover but that organizations would be well advised to encourage supervisors to act agreeably with subordinates or hire and promote supervisors who do so.
References
2012). Socialization perspectives and positive organizational scholarship. In K. S. CameronG. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 537–551). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734610.013.0040
(2013). The theory of purposeful work behavior: The role of personality, higher-order goals, and job characteristics. Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 132–153. 10.5465/amr.2010.0479
(2005). The role of change in the relationship between commitment and turnover: A latent growth modeling approach. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(3), 468–482. 10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.468
(2016). Antecedents and consequences of employer branding. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(1), 57–72. 10.1007/s10551-014-2502-3
(2004). Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 901–910. 10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.901
(2020). Investigating key antecedents and outcomes of employee-based brand equity. European Management Review, 17(1), 41–55. 10.1111/emre.12327
(2011). Will they stay or will they go? Exploring a customer-oriented approach to employee retention. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(2), 213–217. 10.1007/s10869-011-9223-8
(2007). Employee equity: Toward a person-based approach to HRM. Human Resource Management Review, 17(2), 140–151. 10.1016/j.hrmr.2007.03.006
(2007). The relationships of distributive justice and compensation system fairness to employee attitudes in international joint ventures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(6), 687–703. 10.1002/job.438
(1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41(1), 417–440. 10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002221
(2012). A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of Management, 38(6), 1715–1759. 10.1177/0149206311415280
(1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–507. 10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500
(2010). Leader-member exchange and affective organizational commitment: The contribution of supervisor’s organizational embodiment. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1085–1103. 10.1037/a0020858
(2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 565–573. 10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.565
(2008). Giving commitment: Employee support programs and the prosocial sensemaking process. Academy of Management Journal, 51(5), 898–918. 10.5465/AMJ.2008.34789652
(2019). Scale adaptation in organizational science research: A review and best-practice recommendations. Journal of Management, 45(6), 2596–2627. 10.1177/0149206319850280
(1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 104–121. 10.1177/109442819800100106
(2003). Using theory to evaluate personality and job-performance relations: A socioanalytic perspective. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 100–112. 10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.100
(1991). The Big Five Inventory-Versions 4a and 54. University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research, CA.
(1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). Wiley.
(2009). Commitment in organizations: Accumulated wisdom and new directions. Taylor & Francis.
(2016). Employer image and employer branding: What we know and what we need to know. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3(1), 407–440. 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062501
(2013). Why the items versus parcels controversy needn't be one. Psychological Methods, 18(3), 285–300. 10.1037/a0033266
(2016). A multi-rater framework for studying personality: The trait-reputation-identity model. Psychological Review, 123(5), 569–591. 10.1037/rev0000035
(1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538–551. 10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.538
(2004). Employee commitment and motivation: A conceptual analysis and integrative model. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 991–1007. 10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.991
(2001). Commitment in the workplace: Toward a general model. Human Resource Management Review, 11(3), 299–326. 10.1016/S1053-4822(00)00053-X
(2021). Profiles of global and target-specific work commitments: Why compatibility is better and how to achieve it. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 128, 103588. 10.1016/j.jvb.2021.103588
(2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20–52. 10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842
(2014). Persuasion. In D. W. Stacks, M. B. Salwen, & K. C. Eichhorn (Eds.), An integrated approach to communication theory and research (pp. 259–273). Routledge.
(2011). Validity of observer ratings of the five-factor model of personality traits: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 762–773. 10.1037/a0021832
(1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107–142. 10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7
(2022). In Oxford’s Lexico dictionary. Retrieved from https://www.lexico.com/definition/promote
(2009). A tale of three perspectives: Examining post hoc statistical techniques for detection and correction of common method variance. Organizational Research Methods, 12(4), 762–800. 10.1177/1094428109332834
(2002). The Big Five personality factors and personal values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(6), 789–801. 10.1177/0146167202289008
(2022). An updated guideline for assessing discriminant validity. Organizational Research Methods, 25(1), 6–14. 10.1177/1094428120968614
(1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224–253. 10.2307/2392563
(2017). Integrating moderation and mediation: A structural equation modeling approach. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 721–745. 10.1177/1094428115621609
(2005). Two routes to influence: Integrating leader–member exchange and social network perspectives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(4), 505–535. 10.2189/asqu.50.4.505
(2018). Employer branding: A brand equity-based literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 155–179. 10.1111/ijmr.12121
(2015). RWA Web: A free, comprehensive, web-based, and user-friendly tool for relative weight analyses. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(2), 207–216. 10.1007/s10869-014-9351-z
(2019). Visions of change as visions of continuity. Academy of Management Journal, 62(3), 667–690. 10.5465/amj.2015.1196
(2019). Enhancing firm performance through internal market orientation and employee organizational commitment. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(6), 964–987. 10.1080/09585192.2017.1380059
(2020). Measurement development and evaluation. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 7(1), 213–232. 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-044957
(2012). Explaining the pathways between approach-avoidance personality traits and employees’ job search behavior. Journal of Management, 38(8), 1450–1475. 10.1177/0149206310396376
(