Conceptual Issues and Assessment of Implicit Theories
Abstract
Abstract. We reviewed fundamental conceptual issues and the state of research on the definition and assessment of implicit theories. We grappled with the following controversies related to the construct: (a) Are entity theory and incremental theory opposite ends of the same continuum? (b) How can scholars use more sophisticated methodologies to classify individuals into either the entity or incremental theory? (c) Given shifting conceptions of what intelligence is, how can scholars refine the implicit theory of intelligence construct? Given these conceptual issues, we then addressed practical issues related to the assessment of implicit theories. We point to the need for more sophisticated methods such as implicit association tests and the use of virtual environments as more “stealthy” ways to assess the construct.
References
1995). Implicit theories in broad perspective. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 286–290. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli0604_2
(1946). Forming impressions of personality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258–290. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli0604_2
(2007). Relating narrative, inquiry, and inscriptions: Supporting consequential play. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16, 59–82. doi: 10.1007/s10956-010-9220-0
(2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x
(2004). Epistemological beliefs and implicit theories of intelligence as predictors of achievement goals. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 371–388. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2003.10.001
(2013). Mind-sets matter: A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 655–701. doi: 10.1037/a0029531
(2012). Implicit theories, epistemic beliefs, and science motivation: A person-centered approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 724–735. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.07.013
(2010). Assessment, technology, and change. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42, 309–328. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2010.10782553
(1955). Processes affecting scores on “understanding of others” and “assumed similarity”. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 177–193. doi: 10.1037/h0044919
(2014). Changes in implicit theories of ability in biology and dropout from STEM majors: A latent growth curve approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 233–247. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.06.003
(2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science, 323, 66–69. doi: 10.1126/science.1167311
(2016). A prospective correlational analysis of achievement goals as mediating constructs linking distal motivational dispositions to intrinsic motivation and academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 30–41. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2016.06.020
(2013). Does implicit theory of intelligence cause achievement goals? Evidence from an experimental study. International Journal of Educational Research, 61, 38–47. doi: 10.1037/edu0000048
(2005). Implicit theories of intelligence, goal orientation, cognitive engagement, and achievement: A test of Dweck’s model with returning to school adults. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 43–59. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.007
(1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. The American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040
(2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
(2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Ballantine.
(1995a). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267–285. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1
(1995b). Implicit theories: Elaboration and extension of the model. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 322–333. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli0604_12
(1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
(1997). Relations among children’s social goals, implicit personality theories, and responses to social failure. Developmental Psychology, 33, 263–272. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.33.2.263
(2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297–327. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225
(2013). Serious games as new educational tools: How effective are they? A meta-analysis of recent studies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 207–219. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00489.x
(2010). How implicit beliefs influence trust recovery. Psychological Science, 21, 645–648. doi: 10.1177/0956797610367752
(1958). The Psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley.
(1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 588–599. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.588
(2009). Implicit beliefs, achievement goals, and procrastination: A mediational analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 151–154. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.08.006
(2010). A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: Different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels? Psychological Bulletin, 136, 422–449. doi: 10.1037/a0018947
(2013). Improving science assessments by situating them in a virtual environment. Education Sciences, 3, 172–192. doi: 10.3390/educsci3020172
(2015). Mathematically gifted students and high achievement: The role of motivation and classroom structure. High Ability Studies, 26, 227–243. doi: 10.1080/13598139.2015.1095075
(2017). Measuring a mastery goal structure using the TARGET framework: Development and validation of a classroom goal structure questionnaire. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 225, 64–75. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000277
(2002). On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychological Methods, 7, 19–40. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.19
(2007). Profiles of ability, effort, and difficulty: Relationships with worldviews, motivation and adjustment. Learning and Instruction, 17, 739–754. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.014
(2006). Why do beliefs about intelligence influence learning success? A social cognitive neuroscience model. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 1, 75–86. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsl013
(2015). Using implicit measures to highlight science teachers’ implicit theories of intelligence. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 30, 269–280. doi: 10.1007/s10212-015-0249-6
(2010). Naive theories of intelligence and the role of processing fluency in perceived comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 535–557. doi: 10.1037/a0019745
(2006). Finding “meaning” in psychology: A lay theories approach to self-regulation, social perception, and social development. The American Psychologist, 61, 192–203. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.192
(2011). Mind your errors evidence for a neural mechanism linking growth mind-set to adaptive posterror adjustments. Psychological Science, 22, 1484–1489. doi: 10.1177/0956797611419520
(2007). Scientific inquiry in educational multi-user virtual environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 265–283. doi: 10.1007/s10648-007-9048-1
(1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231
(1995). Entity and incremental world views: Some lessons from learned helplessness theory and research. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 307–311. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli0604_8
(2013). Mothers’ daily person and process praise: Implications for children’s theory of intelligence and motivation. Developmental Psychology, 49, 2040–2046. doi: 10.1037/a0031840
(2005). Use of the extreme groups approach: A critical reexamination and new recommendations. Psychological Methods, 10, 178–192. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.10.2.178
(2015). Leveraging mindsets to promote academic achievement: Policy recommendations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 721–726. doi: 10.1177/1745691615599383
(2010).
(Integrating learning and engagement in narrative-centered learning environments . In V. AlevenJ. KayJ. MostowEds., Proceedings of the 10th international conference on intelligent tutoring systems – Volume part II (pp. 166–177). Pittsburgh, PA: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-13437-1_172016). Overcoming the ivory tower: Transfer and societal responsibility as crucial aspects of the Bildung-Psychology approach. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13, 636–651. doi: 10.1080/17405629.2016.1231061
(2014). Mindset induction effects on cognitive control: A neurobehavioral investigation. Biological Psychology, 103, 27–37. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.08.004
(1995). Implicit theories and achievement behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 311–314. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli0604_9
(2003). Die Skalen zur Erfassung subjektiver Überzeugungen zu Bedingungen von Erfolg in Lern- und Leistungskontexten (SE-SÜBELLKO)
([Scales for the assessment of subjective beliefs regarding prerequisites of success in learning and performance contexts] . Diagnostik von Motivation und Selbstkonzept. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe, 15–27.1985).
(Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom . In J. Stiensmeier-PelsterF. RheinbergEds., Journal of Personality (pp. 607–627). 49. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.6071996). Children’s beliefs about intelligence and school performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 397–407. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.88.3.397
(2014). The pivotal role of effort beliefs in mediating implicit theories of intelligence and achievement goals and academic motivations. Social Psychology of Education, 18, 101–120. doi: 10.1007/s11218-014-9281-7
(1998). The naive scientist revisited: Naive theories and social judgment. Social Cognition, 16, 1–7. doi: 10.1521/soco.1998.16.1.1
(2015). Holding a silver lining theory: When negative attributes heighten performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 57, 15–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.11.001
(2012). Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist, 47, 302–314. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2012.722805
(2016). Using design thinking to improve psychological interventions: The case of the growth mindset during the transition to high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 374–391. doi: 10.1037/edu0000098
(2016). Teaching a lay theory before college narrows achievement gaps at scale. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, E3341–E3348. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1524360113
(