Abstract
Abstract. This review focuses on some relevant issues concerning the relationship between theory of mind (ToM) and humanoid robots. Humanoid robots are employed in different everyday-life contexts, so it seems relevant to question whether the relationships between human beings and humanoids can be characterized by a mode of interaction typical of the relationships between human beings, that is, the attribution of mental states. Because ToM development continuously undergoes changes from early childhood to late adulthood, we adopted a lifespan perspective. We analyzed contributions from the literature by organizing them around the partition between “mental states and actions” and “human-like features.” Finally, we considered how studying human–robot interaction, within a ToM context, can contribute to our understanding of the intersubjective nature of this interaction.
References
1983). The complete robot. Glasgow, UK: Harper Voyager.
(2011). Understanding how children understand robots: Perceived animism in child-robot interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 69, 539–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2011.04.003
(1998). Infants’ sensitivity to familiar imperfect contingencies in social interaction. Infant Behavior & Development, 21, 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(98)90060-1
(2016). Robots learn to recognize individuals from imitative encounters with people and avatars. Scientific Reports, 6, 19908. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19908
(2016). Young children treat robots as informants. Topics in Cognitive Science, 8, 481–491. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12192
(2013). Robots with display screens: A robot with a more humanlike face display is perceived to have more mind and a better personality. PLoS One, 8, e72589. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072589
(2005). The development of gaze following and its relation to language. Developmental Science, 8, 535–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00445.x
(2001). Do apes and children know what they have seen? Animal Cognition, 3, 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100710100078
(2015). Developmental robotics: From babies to robots. London, UK: MIT Press.
(2006). School-aged children exhibit domain-specific responses to biological motion. Social Neuroscience, 1, 396–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470910601041382
(2010). Fairness and intentionality in children’s decision-making. International Review of Economics, 57, 269–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-010-0101-x
(2010). Brain response to a humanoid robot in areas implicated in the perception of human emotional gestures. PLoS One, 5, e11577. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011577
(2017).
(A comparison of kindergarten storytelling by human and humanoid robot with different social behavior . In ACMEd., HRI’17 Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 97–98). New York, NY: ACM.1968). Do androids dream of electric sheep?. New York, NY: Ballantine.
(Eden, A. H.Moor, J. H.Soraker, J. H.Steinhart, E. (Eds.). (2012). Singularity hypotheses: A scientific and philosophical assessment. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
2000). The eyes have it: The neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 24, 581–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7634(00)00025-7
(2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114, 864–886. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864
(2017). Resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL)), Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0051
(2013). Toward understanding social cues and signals in human-robot interaction: Effects of robot gaze and proxemic behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 859. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00859
(2017). Robots, jobs, taxes, and responsibilities. Philosophy & Technology, 30, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0257-3
(2004). On the morality of artificial agents. Minds and Machines, 14, 349–379. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MIND.0000035461.63578.9d
(1919/1955). The uncanny. The standard edition of the works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 17, pp. 217–248). London, UK: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1919)
(1999). Interacting minds – A biological basis. Science, 286, 1692–1695. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5445.1692
(2007).
(The social construction of the subjective self: The role of affect-mirroring, markedness, and ostensive communication in self development . In L. MayesP. FonagyM. TargetEds., Developmental Science and Psychoanalysis (pp. 45–82). London, UK: Karnac.1996). The social biofeedback model of parental affect-mirroring. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 77, 1181–1212.
(2012). Further progress towards a home robot companion for people with mild cognitive impairment. In Proceedings 2012 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics (pp. 637–644). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, .
(1964). Descartes, La Mettrie, language, and machines. Philosophy, 39, 193–222. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819100055595
(1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3, 367–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7
(2003). Iliade
. ([Iliad] . Milan, Italy: BUR Biblioteca Univerzale Rizzoli.2008). Development of mentalizing and communication: From viewpoint of developmental cybernetics and developmental cognitive neuroscience. IEICE Transactions on Communications, E91.B, 2109–2117. https://doi.org/10.1093/ietcom/e91-b.7.2109
(1999). Chimpanzee use of human and conspecific social cues to locate hidden food. Developmental Science, 2, 448–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00089
(2008). How to build an intentional android: Infants’ imitation of a robot’s goal-directed actions. Infancy, 13, 519–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/15250000802329503
(2008).
(Discovering mind: Development of mentalizing in human children . In S. ItakuraK. FujitaEds., Origins of the social mind: Evolutionary and developmental views (pp. 179–198). Tokyo, Japan: Springer Japan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-75179-3_92011). Do elderly people prefer a conversational humanoid as a shopping assistant partner in supermarkets. In 6th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI) (pp. 449–457). New York, NY: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1957656.1957816
(1906). Zur Psychologie des Unheimlichen
([On the psychology of the uncanny] . Psychiatrisch-neurologische Wochenschrift, 8, 195–198.1997). On the psychology of the uncanny (1906). Angelaki, 2, 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09697259708571910
(1991). Newborns’ preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline. Cognition, 40, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(91)90045-6
(2012). Robovie, you’ll have to go into the closet now”: Children’s social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot. Developmental Psychology, 48, 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027033
(2005). Six-and-a-half-month-old children positively attribute goals to human action and to humanoid-robot motion. Cognitive Development, 20, 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2005.04.004
(2010). Young children’s folk knowledge of robots. Asian Culture and History, 2, 111–116. https://doi.org/10.5539/ach.v2n2p111
(1977). The restoration of the self. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
(2008). Can machines think? Interaction and perspective taking with robots investigated via fMRI. PLoS One, 3, e2597. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002597
(2017). Teoria della Mente, bambini e robot: L’attribuzione di stati mentali
([Theory of mind, children, and robots: The attribution of mental states] . Proceedings of the XXX Congresso Nazionale AIP della Sezione di Psicologia dello Sviluppo e dell’Educazione, Messina, Italy.2016). Seeing minds in others – Can agents with robotic appearance have human-like preferences? PLoS One, 11, e0146310. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146310
(2012). When art moves the eyes: A behavioral and eye-tracking study. PLoS One, 7, e37285. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037285
(1995). Understanding the intentions of others: Re-enactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Developmental Psychology, 31, 838–850. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.31.5.838
(2005).
(Imitation and other minds: The “like me” hypothesis . In S. HurleyN. ChaterEds., Perspectives on imitation: From neuroscience to social science (Vol. 2, pp. 55–77). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.2007a). “Like me”: A foundation for social cognition. Developmental Science, 10, 126–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00574.x
(2007b). The “like me” framework for recognizing and becoming an intentional agent. Acta Psychologica, 124, 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.09.005
(2013). Origins of social cognition. Bidirectional self-other mapping and the “like-me” hypothesis. In M. R. BanajiS. A. Gelman (Eds.), Navigating the social world (pp. 139–144). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199890712.003.0025
(2001).
(“Like me” as a building block for understanding other minds: Bodily acts, attention, and intention . In B. MalleL. J. MosesD. BaldwinEds., Intentions and intentionality: Foundations of social cognition (pp. 171–191). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.2010). “Social” robots are psychological agents for infants: A test of gaze following. Neural Networks, 23, 966–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2010.09.005
(1977). Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science, 198, 75–78. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.897687
(1983). Newborn infants imitate adult facial gestures. Child Development, 54, 702–709. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130058
(1989). Imitation in newborn infants: Exploring the range of gestures imitated and the underlying mechanisms. Developmental Psychology, 25, 954–962. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.25.6.954
(1998). Infant gaze following based on eye direction. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16, 495–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1998.tb00767.x
(1998). Following the direction of gaze and language development in 6-month-olds. Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 373–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(98)90014-5
(1970). Bukimi no tani [The uncanny valley]. Energy, 7, 33–35. Transl. K. F. MacDorman and N. Kageki (2012). IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 19, 98–100. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811
(2012). The uncanny valley [from the field]. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 19, 98–100. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811
(2010). Children perseverate to a human’s actions but not to a robot’s actions. Developmental Science, 13, 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00860.x
(2012). Observed human actions, and not mechanical actions, induce searching errors in infants. Child Development Research, 2012, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/465458
(2017). Why are there developmental stages in language learning? A developmental robotics model of language development. Cognitive Science, 41(Suppl 1), 32–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12390
(2009). Sociable robot improves toddler vocabulary skills. In HRI ‘09. Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 307–308). New York, NY: ACM
(2007).
(Islamic automation: A reading of Al-Jazari’s. The book of knowledge of ingenious mechanical devices (1206) . In O. GrauEd., Media art histories (pp. 163–178). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.2012). Do robot appearance and speech affect people’s attitude? Evaluation through the Ultimatum Game. In 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (pp. 809–814). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2012.6343851
(2013a). Infants understand the referential nature of human gaze but not robot gaze. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116, 86–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2013.02.007
(2013b). Can infants use robot gaze for object learning?: The effect of verbalization. In F. BrozH. LehmannB. MutluY. Nakano (Eds.), Gaze in human-robot communication [Interaction Studies 14:3] (pp. 33–46). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.81.03oku
(2017). Telling stories to robots. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 100–108). New York, NY: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2909824.3020245
(1954). The construction of reality in the child (
(M. Cook , Trans.). New York, NY: Basic Books.2006). Mirrors in the mind. Scientific American, 5, 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1106-54
(2006). Leonardo’s lost robots. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
(2011). A conversational robot in an elderly care center. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on human-robot Interaction (pp. 37–44). New York, NY: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1957656.1957669
(2014). Exploring responses to art in adolescence: A behavioral and eye-tracking study. PLoS One, 9, e102888. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102888
(2010). How do young children deal with hybrids of living and non-living things: The case of humanoid robots. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28, 835–851. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151009X481049
(2014). Fractionating theory of mind: A meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 42, 9–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.01.009
(1994). Frankenstein. Mineola, NY: Dover.
(2003). Emergence of joint attention: Relationships between gaze following, social referencing, imitation, and naming in infancy. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 164, 54–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221320309597503
(2011). Remote control and children’s understanding of robots. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109, 239–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2011.01.005
(2014). Does the robot have a mind? Mind perception and attitudes towards robots predict use of an eldercare robot. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6, 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-013-0186-y
(2007). I robot di Leonardo (La meccanica e nuovi automi nei codici svelati)
([Leonardo’s robots (Mechanics and new automata in unveiled codes)] . Parma, Italy: Leonardo3.2014). Different impressions of other agents obtained through social interaction uniquely modulate dorsal and ventral pathway activities in the social human brain. Cortex, 58, 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2014.03.011
(2007). Socialization between toddlers and robots at an early childhood education center. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 17954–17958. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707769104
(2012). Children teach a care-receiving robot to promote their learning: Field experiments in a classroom for vocabulary learning. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 1, 78–95. https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.1.1.Tanaka
(2001). The ontogeny of gaze following in chimpanzees, pan troglodytes, and rhesus macaques, macaca mulatta. Animal Behaviour, 61, 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1598
(2007). Reliance on head versus eyes in the gaze following of great apes and human infants: The cooperative eye hypothesis. Journal of Human Evolution, 52, 314–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.10.001
(1998).
(The concept and foundations of infant intersubjectivity . In S. BråtenEd., Intersubjective Communication and Emotion in Early Ontogeny (pp. 15–46). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.1978). The infant’s response to entrapment between contradictory messages in face-to-face interaction. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 17, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-7138(09)62273-1
(2011). Infants’ meaning-making and the development of mental health problems. The American Psychologist, 66, 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021631
(1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 49, 433–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6710-5_3
(2004). Whither psychoanalysis in computer culture. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 21, 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/0736-9735.21.1.16
(1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
(2015). The interplay of robot language level with children’s language learning during storytelling. In Proceedings of the tenth annual ACM/IEEE international conference, Portland, OR (pp. 65–66). New York, NY: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2701973.2701989
(1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5
(