Skip to main content
Review Article

Theory of Mind and Humanoid Robots From a Lifespan Perspective

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000326

Abstract. This review focuses on some relevant issues concerning the relationship between theory of mind (ToM) and humanoid robots. Humanoid robots are employed in different everyday-life contexts, so it seems relevant to question whether the relationships between human beings and humanoids can be characterized by a mode of interaction typical of the relationships between human beings, that is, the attribution of mental states. Because ToM development continuously undergoes changes from early childhood to late adulthood, we adopted a lifespan perspective. We analyzed contributions from the literature by organizing them around the partition between “mental states and actions” and “human-like features.” Finally, we considered how studying human–robot interaction, within a ToM context, can contribute to our understanding of the intersubjective nature of this interaction.

References

  • Asimov, I. (1983). The complete robot. Glasgow, UK: Harper Voyager. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Beran, T. N., Ramirez-Serrano, A., Kuzyk, R., Fior, M. & Nugent, S. (2011). Understanding how children understand robots: Perceived animism in child-robot interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 69, 539–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2011.04.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bigelow, A. E. (1998). Infants’ sensitivity to familiar imperfect contingencies in social interaction. Infant Behavior & Development, 21, 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(98)90060-1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boucenna, S., Cohen, D., Meltzoff, A. N., Gaussier, P. & Chetouani, M. (2016). Robots learn to recognize individuals from imitative encounters with people and avatars. Scientific Reports, 6, 19908. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19908 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Breazeal, C., Harris, P. L., DeSteno, D., Kory, W., Jacqueline, M., Dickens, L. & Jeong, S. (2016). Young children treat robots as informants. Topics in Cognitive Science, 8, 481–491. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12192 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Broadbent, E., Kumar, V., Li, X., Sollers, J., Stafford, R. Q., MacDonald, B. A. & Wegner, D. M. (2013). Robots with display screens: A robot with a more humanlike face display is perceived to have more mind and a better personality. PLoS One, 8, e72589. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072589 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brooks, R. & Meltzoff, A. N. (2005). The development of gaze following and its relation to language. Developmental Science, 8, 535–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00445.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Call, J. & Carpenter, M. (2001). Do apes and children know what they have seen? Animal Cognition, 3, 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100710100078 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cangelosi, A. & Schlesinger, M. (2015). Developmental robotics: From babies to robots. London, UK: MIT Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carter, E. J. & Pelphrey, K. A. (2006). School-aged children exhibit domain-specific responses to biological motion. Social Neuroscience, 1, 396–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470910601041382 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Castelli, I., Massaro, D., Sanfey, A. G. & Marchetti, A. (2010). Fairness and intentionality in children’s decision-making. International Review of Economics, 57, 269–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-010-0101-x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chaminade, T., Zecca, M., Blakemore, S. J., Takanishi, A., Frith, C. D., Micera, S., … Umiltà, M. A. (2010). Brain response to a humanoid robot in areas implicated in the perception of human emotional gestures. PLoS One, 5, e11577. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011577 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Conti, D., Di Nuovo, A., Cirasa, C. & Di Nuovo, S. (2017). A comparison of kindergarten storytelling by human and humanoid robot with different social behavior. In ACMEd., HRI’17 Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 97–98). New York, NY: ACM. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dick, P. K. (1968). Do androids dream of electric sheep?. New York, NY: Ballantine. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eden, A. H.Moor, J. H.Soraker, J. H.Steinhart, E. (Eds.). (2012). Singularity hypotheses: A scientific and philosophical assessment. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Emery, N. J. (2000). The eyes have it: The neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 24, 581–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7634(00)00025-7 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Epley, N., Waytz, A. & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114, 864–886. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • European Parliament (2017). Resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL)), Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0051 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fiore, S., Wiltshire, T., Lobato, E., Jentsch, F., Huang, W. & Axelrod, B. (2013). Toward understanding social cues and signals in human-robot interaction: Effects of robot gaze and proxemic behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 859. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00859 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Floridi, L. (2017). Robots, jobs, taxes, and responsibilities. Philosophy & Technology, 30, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0257-3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Floridi, L. & Sanders, J. W. (2004). On the morality of artificial agents. Minds and Machines, 14, 349–379. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MIND.0000035461.63578.9d First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Freud, S. (1919/1955). The uncanny. The standard edition of the works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 17, pp. 217–248). London, UK: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1919) First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Frith, C. D. & Frith, U. (1999). Interacting minds – A biological basis. Science, 286, 1692–1695. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5445.1692 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gergely, G. (2007). The social construction of the subjective self: The role of affect-mirroring, markedness, and ostensive communication in self development. In L. MayesP. FonagyM. TargetEds., Developmental Science and Psychoanalysis (pp. 45–82). London, UK: Karnac. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gergely, G. & Watson, J. S. (1996). The social biofeedback model of parental affect-mirroring. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 77, 1181–1212. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gross, H.-M., Schroeter, C., Mueller, S., Volkhardt, M., Einhorn, E., Bley, A., … Berlo, A. V. (2012). Further progress towards a home robot companion for people with mild cognitive impairment. In Proceedings 2012 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics (pp. 637–644). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gunderson, K. (1964). Descartes, La Mettrie, language, and machines. Philosophy, 39, 193–222. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819100055595 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Güth, W., Schmittberger, R. & Schwarze, B. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3, 367–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Homer. (2003). Iliade [Iliad]. Milan, Italy: BUR Biblioteca Univerzale Rizzoli. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Itakura, S. (2008). Development of mentalizing and communication: From viewpoint of developmental cybernetics and developmental cognitive neuroscience. IEICE Transactions on Communications, E91.B, 2109–2117. https://doi.org/10.1093/ietcom/e91-b.7.2109 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Itakura, S., Agnetta, B., Hare, B. & Tomasello, M. (1999). Chimpanzee use of human and conspecific social cues to locate hidden food. Developmental Science, 2, 448–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00089 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Itakura, S., Ishida, H., Kanda, T., Shimada, Y., Ishiguro, H. & Lee, K. (2008). How to build an intentional android: Infants’ imitation of a robot’s goal-directed actions. Infancy, 13, 519–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/15250000802329503 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Itakura, S., Okanda, M. & Moriguchi, Y. (2008). Discovering mind: Development of mentalizing in human children. In S. ItakuraK. FujitaEds., Origins of the social mind: Evolutionary and developmental views (pp. 179–198). Tokyo, Japan: Springer Japan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-75179-3_9 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Iwamura, Y., Shiomi, M., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H. & Hagita, N. (2011). Do elderly people prefer a conversational humanoid as a shopping assistant partner in supermarkets. In 6th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI) (pp. 449–457). New York, NY: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1957656.1957816 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jentsch, E. (1906). Zur Psychologie des Unheimlichen [On the psychology of the uncanny]. Psychiatrisch-neurologische Wochenschrift, 8, 195–198. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jentsch, E. (1997). On the psychology of the uncanny (1906). Angelaki, 2, 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09697259708571910 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Johnson, M. H., Dziurawiec, S., Ellis, H. & Morton, J. (1991). Newborns’ preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline. Cognition, 40, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(91)90045-6 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kahn, P. H., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Freier, N. G., Severson, R. L., Gill, B. T., … Shen, S. (2012). Robovie, you’ll have to go into the closet now”: Children’s social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot. Developmental Psychology, 48, 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027033 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kamewari, K., Kato, M., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H. & Hiraki, K. (2005). Six-and-a-half-month-old children positively attribute goals to human action and to humanoid-robot motion. Cognitive Development, 20, 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2005.04.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Katayama, N., Katayama, J., Kitazaki, M. & Itakura, S. (2010). Young children’s folk knowledge of robots. Asian Culture and History, 2, 111–116. https://doi.org/10.5539/ach.v2n2p111 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kohut, H. (1977). The restoration of the self. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Krach, S., Hegel, F., Wrede, B., Sagerer, G., Binkofski, F. & Kircher, T. (2008). Can machines think? Interaction and perspective taking with robots investigated via fMRI. PLoS One, 3, e2597. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002597 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Manzi, F., Massaro, D., Kanda, T., Kanako, T., Itakura, S. & Marchetti, A. (2017). Teoria della Mente, bambini e robot: L’attribuzione di stati mentali [Theory of mind, children, and robots: The attribution of mental states]. Proceedings of the XXX Congresso Nazionale AIP della Sezione di Psicologia dello Sviluppo e dell’Educazione, Messina, Italy. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Martini, M. C., Gonzalez, C. A. & Wiese, E. (2016). Seeing minds in others – Can agents with robotic appearance have human-like preferences? PLoS One, 11, e0146310. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146310 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Massaro, D., Savazzi, F., Di Dio, C., Freedberg, D., Gallese, V., Gilli, G. & Marchetti, A. (2012). When art moves the eyes: A behavioral and eye-tracking study. PLoS One, 7, e37285. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037285 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meltzoff, A. N. (1995). Understanding the intentions of others: Re-enactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Developmental Psychology, 31, 838–850. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.31.5.838 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meltzoff, A. N. (2005). Imitation and other minds: The “like me” hypothesis. In S. HurleyN. ChaterEds., Perspectives on imitation: From neuroscience to social science (Vol. 2, pp. 55–77). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Meltzoff, A. N. (2007a). “Like me”: A foundation for social cognition. Developmental Science, 10, 126–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00574.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meltzoff, A. N. (2007b). The “like me” framework for recognizing and becoming an intentional agent. Acta Psychologica, 124, 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.09.005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meltzoff, A. N. (2013). Origins of social cognition. Bidirectional self-other mapping and the “like-me” hypothesis. In M. R. BanajiS. A. Gelman (Eds.), Navigating the social world (pp. 139–144). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199890712.003.0025 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meltzoff, A. N. & Brooks, R. (2001). “Like me” as a building block for understanding other minds: Bodily acts, attention, and intention. In B. MalleL. J. MosesD. BaldwinEds., Intentions and intentionality: Foundations of social cognition (pp. 171–191). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Meltzoff, A. N., Brooks, R., Shon, A. P. & Rao, R. P. (2010). “Social” robots are psychological agents for infants: A test of gaze following. Neural Networks, 23, 966–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2010.09.005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meltzoff, A. N. & Moore, M. K. (1977). Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science, 198, 75–78. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.897687 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meltzoff, A. N. & Moore, M. K. (1983). Newborn infants imitate adult facial gestures. Child Development, 54, 702–709. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130058 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meltzoff, A. N. & Moore, M. K. (1989). Imitation in newborn infants: Exploring the range of gestures imitated and the underlying mechanisms. Developmental Psychology, 25, 954–962. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.25.6.954 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moore, C. & Corkum, V. (1998). Infant gaze following based on eye direction. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16, 495–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1998.tb00767.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Morales, M., Mundy, P. & Rojas, J. (1998). Following the direction of gaze and language development in 6-month-olds. Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 373–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(98)90014-5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mori, M. (1970). Bukimi no tani [The uncanny valley]. Energy, 7, 33–35. Transl. K. F. MacDorman and N. Kageki (2012). IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 19, 98–100. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mori, M., MacDorman, K. & Kageki, N. (2012). The uncanny valley [from the field]. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 19, 98–100. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moriguchi, Y., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H. & Itakura, S. (2010). Children perseverate to a human’s actions but not to a robot’s actions. Developmental Science, 13, 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00860.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moriguchi, Y., Matsunaka, R., Itakura, S. & Hiraki, K. (2012). Observed human actions, and not mechanical actions, induce searching errors in infants. Child Development Research, 2012, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/465458 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Morse, A. F. & Cangelosi, A. (2017). Why are there developmental stages in language learning? A developmental robotics model of language development. Cognitive Science, 41(Suppl 1), 32–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12390 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Movellan, J., Eckhardt, M., Virnes, M. & Rodriguez, A. (2009). Sociable robot improves toddler vocabulary skills. In HRI ‘09. Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 307–308). New York, NY: ACM First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nadarajan, G. (2007). Islamic automation: A reading of Al-Jazari’s. The book of knowledge of ingenious mechanical devices (1206). In O. GrauEd., Media art histories (pp. 163–178). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nishio, S., Ogawa, K., Kanakogi, Y., Itakura, S. & Ishiguro, H. (2012). Do robot appearance and speech affect people’s attitude? Evaluation through the Ultimatum Game. In 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (pp. 809–814). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2012.6343851 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Okumura, Y., Kanakogi, Y., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H. & Itakura, S. (2013a). Infants understand the referential nature of human gaze but not robot gaze. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116, 86–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2013.02.007 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Okumura, Y., Kanakogi, Y., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H. & Itakura, S. (2013b). Can infants use robot gaze for object learning?: The effect of verbalization. In F. BrozH. LehmannB. MutluY. Nakano (Eds.), Gaze in human-robot communication [Interaction Studies 14:3] (pp. 33–46). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.81.03oku First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Park, H. W., Gelsomini, M., Lee, J. J. & Breazeal, C. (2017). Telling stories to robots. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 100–108). New York, NY: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2909824.3020245 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child (M. Cook, Trans.). New York, NY: Basic Books. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L. & Gallese, V. (2006). Mirrors in the mind. Scientific American, 5, 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1106-54 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rosheim, M. (2006). Leonardo’s lost robots. Berlin, Germany: Springer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sabelli, A. M., Kanda, T. & Hagita, N. (2011). A conversational robot in an elderly care center. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on human-robot Interaction (pp. 37–44). New York, NY: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1957656.1957669 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Savazzi, F., Massaro, D., Di Dio, C., Gallese, V., Gilli, G. & Marchetti, A. (2014). Exploring responses to art in adolescence: A behavioral and eye-tracking study. PLoS One, 9, e102888. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102888 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Saylor, M. M., Somanader, M., Levin, D. T. & Kawamura, K. (2010). How do young children deal with hybrids of living and non-living things: The case of humanoid robots. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28, 835–851. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151009X481049 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schurz, M., Radua, J., Aichhorn, M., Richlan, F. & Perner, J. (2014). Fractionating theory of mind: A meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 42, 9–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.01.009 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shelley, M. (1994). Frankenstein. Mineola, NY: Dover. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Slaughter, V. & McConnell, D. (2003). Emergence of joint attention: Relationships between gaze following, social referencing, imitation, and naming in infancy. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 164, 54–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221320309597503 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Somanader, M. C., Saylor, M. M. & Levin, D. T. (2011). Remote control and children’s understanding of robots. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109, 239–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2011.01.005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stafford, R. Q., MacDonald, B. A., Jayawardena, C., Wegner, D. M. & Broadbent, E. (2014). Does the robot have a mind? Mind perception and attitudes towards robots predict use of an eldercare robot. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6, 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-013-0186-y First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Taddei, M. (2007). I robot di Leonardo (La meccanica e nuovi automi nei codici svelati) [Leonardo’s robots (Mechanics and new automata in unveiled codes)]. Parma, Italy: Leonardo3. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Takahashi, H., Terada, K., Morita, T., Suzuki, S., Haji, T., Kozima, H., … Naito, E. (2014). Different impressions of other agents obtained through social interaction uniquely modulate dorsal and ventral pathway activities in the social human brain. Cortex, 58, 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2014.03.011 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tanaka, F., Cicourel, A. & Movellan, J. R. (2007). Socialization between toddlers and robots at an early childhood education center. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 17954–17958. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707769104 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tanaka, F. & Matsuzoe, S. (2012). Children teach a care-receiving robot to promote their learning: Field experiments in a classroom for vocabulary learning. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 1, 78–95. https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.1.1.Tanaka First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tomasello, M., Hare, B. & Fogleman, T. (2001). The ontogeny of gaze following in chimpanzees, pan troglodytes, and rhesus macaques, macaca mulatta. Animal Behaviour, 61, 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1598 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tomasello, M., Hare, B., Lehmann, H. & Call, J. (2007). Reliance on head versus eyes in the gaze following of great apes and human infants: The cooperative eye hypothesis. Journal of Human Evolution, 52, 314–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.10.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Trevarthen, C. (1998). The concept and foundations of infant intersubjectivity. In S. BråtenEd., Intersubjective Communication and Emotion in Early Ontogeny (pp. 15–46). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tronick, E., Als, H., Adamson, L., Wise, S. & Brazelton, T. B. (1978). The infant’s response to entrapment between contradictory messages in face-to-face interaction. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 17, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-7138(09)62273-1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tronick, E. & Beeghly, M. (2011). Infants’ meaning-making and the development of mental health problems. The American Psychologist, 66, 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021631 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 49, 433–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6710-5_3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Turkle, S. (2004). Whither psychoanalysis in computer culture. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 21, 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/0736-9735.21.1.16 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Westlund, J. K. & Breazeal, C. (2015). The interplay of robot language level with children’s language learning during storytelling. In Proceedings of the tenth annual ACM/IEEE international conference, Portland, OR (pp. 65–66). New York, NY: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2701973.2701989 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wimmer, H. & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar