Skip to main content
Editorial

Neuropsychology in the Real World

Applications and Implications of Ambulatory Assessment

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1024/1016-264X/a000139

Current ambulatory technologies are highly relevant for neuropsychological assessment and treatment as they provide a gateway to real life data. Ambulatory assessment of cognitive complaints, skills and emotional states in natural contexts provides information that has a greater ecological validity than traditional assessment approaches. This issue presents an overview of current technological and methodological innovations, opportunities, problems and limitations of these methods designed for the context-sensitive measurement of cognitive, emotional and behavioral function. The usefulness of selected ambulatory approaches is demonstrated and their relevance for an ecologically valid neuropsychology is highlighted.


Realitätsnahe Neuropsychologie: Anwendungen und Implikationen des ambulanten Assessments

Die modernen ambulanten Technologien sind zunehmend für die neuropsychologische Diagnostik und Behandlung hirngeschädigter Patienten von Bedeutung, da diese einen Zugang zu den Daten des Alltagslebens eröffnen. Das ambulante Assessment ermöglicht es, kognitive Beeinträchtigungen, emotionale Zustände und Verhaltensauffälligkeiten in natürlichen Umgebungen mit einer höheren ökologischen Validität zu erfassen als traditionelle Verfahren. Dieses Themenheft gibt einen Überblick über aktuelle technologische und methodische Innovationen, Einsatzmöglichkeiten, Probleme und Grenzen dieser neuen Verfahren zur kontext-sensitiven Analyse kognitiver, emotionaler und behavioraler Funktionen. Der Nutzen ausgewählter ambulanter Methoden wird erläutert und deren Relevanz für eine ökologisch validere Neuropsychologie wird hervorgehoben.

References

  • Beblo, T. , Mensebach, C. , Wingenfeld, K. , Schlosser, N. , Rullkoetter, N. , Schaffrath, C. , Driessen, M. (2010). The impact of neutral and emotionally negative distraction on memory performance and its relation to memory complaints in major depression. Psychiatry Research, 178, 106 – 111. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bussmann, J.B. , Ebner-Priemer, U.W. , Fahrenberg, J. (2009). Ambulatory acitvity monitoring: Progress in measurement of activity, posture, and specific motion patterns in daily life. European Psychologist, 14, 142 – 152. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Chaytor, N. , Schmitter-Edgecombe, M. (2003). The ecological validity of neuropsychological tests: a review of the literature on everyday cognitive skills. Neuropsychology Review, 13, 181 – 197. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chaytor, N. , Schmitter-Edgecombe, M. , Burr, R. (2006). Improving the ecological validity of executive functioning assessment. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 21, 217 – 227. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cuberos-Urbano, G. , Caracuel, A. , Vilar-López, R. , Valls-Serrano, C. , Bateman, A. , Verdejo-García, A. (2013). Ecological validity of the Multiple Errands Tests using predictive models of dysexecutive problems in everyday life. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 35, 329 – 336. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Delespaul, P. A. , deVries, M. W. (1987). The daily life of ambulatory chronic mental patients. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175, 537 – 544. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ebner-Priemer, U. W. , Kubiak, T. (2010). The decade of behavior revisited: Future prospects for ambulatory assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26, 151 – 153. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Ebner-Priemer, U.  W. , Trull, T. J. (2009). Ambulatory assessment – An innovative and promising approach for clinical psychology. European Psychologist, 14, 109 – 119. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Fahrenberg, J. (2006). Assessment in daily life. A review of computer-assisted methodologies and applications in psychology and psychophysiology, years 2000 – 2005. Available at www.ambulatory-assessment.org/. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fahrenberg, J. , Myrtek, M. (Eds.). (1996). Ambulatory assessment. Computer-assisted psychological and psychophysiological methods in monitoring and field studies. Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fahrenberg, J. , Myrtek, M. (Eds.). (2001). Progress in ambulatory assessment. Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fahrenberg, J. , Myrtek, M. (2005). Psychophysiologie in Labor, Klinik und Alltag. Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fahrenberg, J. , Myrtek, M. , Pawlik, K. , Perrez, M. (2007). Ambulatory assessment: Monitoring behavior in daily life settings. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 206 – 213. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Hey, S. , Anastasopoulou, P. , von Haaren, B. (2014a). Erfassung körperlicher Aktivität mittels Akzelerometrie – Möglichkeiten und Grenzen aus technischer Sicht. Bewegungstherapie und Gesundheitssport, 30, 73 – 78. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hey, S. , Anastasopoulou, P. , Bideaux, A. , Stork, W. (2014b). Recent developments of ambulatory assessment methods: An overview of current technologies and implications for neuropsychology. Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie, 25, 279 – 287. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Ingram, J. N. , Wolpert, D. M. (2011). Naturalistic approaches to sensorimotor control. Progress Brain Research, 191, 3 – 29. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Loeffler, S. N. , Peper, M. (2014). Affect and memory in real life: evaluating the utility of interactive ambulatory assessment. Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie, 25, 267 – 278. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Mehl, M. R. , Conner, T. S. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of research methods for studying daily life. New York: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Norris, G. , Tate, R. L. (2000). The behavioural assessment of the dysexecutive syndrome: ecological, concurrent and construct validity. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 10, 33 – 45. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peper, M. , Fahrenberg, J. (2009). Psychophysiologie. In W. Sturm, M. Herrmann , T. F. Münte, (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch der Klinischen Neuropsychologie (pp. 190 – 208). Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Prill T., Foerster F. , Fahrenberg J., (2006). 24-Stunden-Monitoring von Periodischen Beinbewegungen (PLM) mit kalibrierter multipler Akzelerometrie. In U.W. Ebner, (Ed.). Ambulantes psychophysiologisches Monitoring  – Neue Perspektiven und Anwendungen (S. 61 – 86). Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rabin, L. A. , Burton, L. A. , Barr, W. (2007). Utilization rates of ecologically oriented instruments among clinical neuropsychologists. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 21, 727 – 743. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rochat, L. , Beni, C. , Annoni, J.-M. , Vuadens, P. , Van der Linden, M. (2013). How inhibition relates to impulsivity after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 19, 890 – 898. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sbordone, R. J. (2008). Ecological validity of neuropsychological testing: critical issues. In A. M. Horton & D. Wedding, (Hrsg.). The neuropsychology handbook. New York: Springer Publishing Company. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schlotz, W. , Powell, D. J. H. (2014). Ambulatory assessment in neuropsychology: Applications in multiple sclerosis research. Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie, 25, 239 – 251. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Schlotz, W. (2012). Ambulatory psychoneuroendocrinology: Assessing salivary cortisol and other hormones in daily life. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner, (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 193 – 209). New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Shammas, L. , von Haaren, B. , Kunzler, A. , Zentek, T. , Rashid, A. (2014). Detection of parameters to quantify neurobehavioral alteration in multiple sclerosis based on daily life physical activity and gait using ambulatory assessment. Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie, 25, 253 – 265. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Stone, A. , Litcher-Kelly, L. (2005). Momentary capture of real-world data. In M. Eid & E. Diener, (Eds.), Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology (pp. 61 – 72). Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Thielgen, T. , Foerster, F. , Fuchs, G. , Hornig, A. , Fahrenberg, J. (2004). Tremor in Parkinson’s Disease: 24-hr monitoring with calibrated accelerometry. Electromyography Clinical Neurophysiology, 44, 137 – 146. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Trull, T. , Ebner-Priemer, U. W. (2011). Clinical psychology. In M. Mehl, T. Connor (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 620 – 635). New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wilson, B. A. , Alderman, N. , Burgess, P. W. , Emslie, H. , Evans, J. J. (1996). Behavioural assessment of the dysexecutive syndrome. St. Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zimmermann, P. , Messner, C. , Poser, U. , Sedelmeier, P. (1991). Ein Fragebogen erlebter Defizite der Aufmerksamkeit (FEDA). [A questionnaire measuring self-experienced deficits of attention, in German]. Freiburg: Psychologisches Institut der Universitat Freiburg. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar