Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185.67.3.143

The malleability of the generic interpretation of masculine role names in French was investigated by manipulating readers’ exposure to feminine forms. In two experiments, participants were to decide whether a person introduced by a kinship term (e.g., sister) could be part of a group represented by a role name (e.g., nurse, musicians). In Experiment 1, role names were presented in the masculine form in the first part and in either the masculine or the feminine form in the second part. Independent of role name stereotypicality, participants were less likely to relate female kinship terms to role names in the masculine form and even less likely when they were also exposed to feminine forms. These results were replicated in a second experiment, in which the communication source was varied: Before performing the experimental task, participants read job advertisements that either used only the masculine or both the masculine and the feminine form. When feminine forms were added, the generic interpretation of the masculine form decreased, even when the feminine forms were provided by a different source.

References

  • Bates, E., Devescovi, A., Hernandez, A., Pizzamiglio, L. 1996 Gender priming in Italian Perception and Psychophysics 58 992 1004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baudino, C. 2001 Politique de la langue et différence sexuelle: La politisation du genre des noms de métiers [Politics of language and gender differences: The politicization of job titles’ gender]. Paris: L’Harmattan First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bem, S. L., Bem, D. L. 1973 Does sex-biased job advertising “aid and abet” sex discrimination? Journal of Applied Social Psychology 3 6 18 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Braun, F. 1996 Das grosse I und seine Schwestern: Eine kritische Bewertung [Capital I and its sisters: A critical evaluation] Deutschunterricht 48 54 62 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Braun, F., Gottburgsen, A., Sczesny, S., Stahlberg, D. 1998 Können Geophysiker Frauen sein? Generische Personenbezeichnungen im Deutschen [Can geophysicists be women? Generic terms in German] Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 26 265 283 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bussmann, H. 1995 Das Genus, die Grammatik und - der Mensch: Geschlechterdifferenz in der Sprachwissenschaft [Gender differences in linguistics]. In H. Bussmann & R. Hof (Eds.), Genus: Zur Geschlechterdifferenz in den Kulturwissenschaften (pp. 114-160). Stuttgart, Germany: Körner First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Carreiras, M., Garnham, A., Oakhill, J., Cain, K. 1996 The use of stereotypical gender information in constructing a mental model: Evidence from English and Spanish. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A Human Experimental Psychology 49 639 663 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chatard, A., Guimond, S., Martinot, D. 2005 Impact de la féminisation lexicale des professions sur l’auto-efficacité des élèves: Une remise en cause de l’universalisme masculin? [Occupational self-efficacy as a function of grammatical gender in French] L’année psychologique 105 249 272 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., Provost, J. 1993 PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 25 257 271 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dixon, P., Bortolussi, M. 2001 Text is not communication: A challenge to a common assumption Discourse Processes 31 1 25 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Duffy, S. A., Keir, J. A. 2004 Violating stereotypes: Eye movements and comprehension processes when text conflicts with world knowledge Memory & Cognition 32 551 559 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gabriel, U., Gygax, P. in press Do language amendments really change gender representations? The case of Norwegian. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gabriel, U., Gygax, P., Sarrasin, O., Garnham, A., Oakhill, J. 2008 Au pairs are rarely male: Norms on the gender perception of role names across English, French, and German Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 40 206 212 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gabriel, U., Mellenberger, F. 2004 Exchanging the generic masculine for gender-balanced forms: The impact of context valence. Swiss Journal of Psychology 63 273 278 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Garnham, A., Oakhill, J. 1996 The mental models theory of language comprehension In B. K. Britton & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 313-339). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Garnham, A., Oakhill, J., Reynolds, D. 2002 Are inferences from stereotyped role names to characters’ gender made elaboratively? Memory & Cognition 30 439 446 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., Tabasso, T. 1994 Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension Psychological Review 101 371 395 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Grice, H. P. 1967 Logic and conversation In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Studies in syntax (Vol. 3, pp. 121-133). New York: Seminar Press First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gygax, P., Gabriel, U., Sarrasin, O., Oakhill, J., Garnham, A. 2008 Generically intended, but specifically interpreted: When beauticians, musicians, and mechanics are all men Language and Cognitive Processes 23 464 485 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gygax, P., Gesto, N. 2007 Féminisation et lourdeur de texte [Feminisation of language and hindering reading] L’Année Psychologique 107 239 256. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Haviland, S. E., Clark, H. H. 1974 What’s new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13 512 521 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heise, E. 2000 Sind Frauen mitgemeint? Eine empirische Untersuchung zum Verständnis des generischen Maskulinums und seiner Alternativen [Are women included? An empirical study of the generic masculine and its alternatives] Sprache & Kognition 19 3 13 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Heise, E. 2003 Auch einfühlsame Studenten sind Männer: Das generische Maskulinum und die mentale Repräsentation von Personen [Sensitive students are men too: The generic masculine and the mental representation of persons] Verhaltenstherapie und psychosoziale Praxis 35 285 291 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Irmen, L., Köhncke, A. 1996 Zur Psychologie des “generischen” Maskulinums [The psychology of the generic masculine] Sprache & Kognition 15 152 166 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Irmen, L., Roßberg, N. 2004 Gender markedness of language: The impact of grammatical and nonlinguistic information on the mental representation of person information Journal of Language and Social Psychology 23 272 307 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kennison, S. M., Trofe, J. L. 2003 Comprehending pronouns: A role for word-specific gender stereotype information Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 32 355 378 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McKoon, G., Ratcliff, R. 1992 Inferences during reading Psychological Review 99 440 446 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Oakhill, J., Garnham, A., Reynolds, D. 2005 Immediate activation of stereotypical gender information Memory and Cognition 33 972 983 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peyer, A., Wyss, E. L. 1998 “JazzmusikerInnen - weder Asketen noch Müesli-Fifis”. Feministische Sprachkritik in der Schweiz, ein Überblick [“Jazz musicians - neither ascetics nor cereals-picker” - Feministic language critic in Switzerland, a review] Germanistische Linguistik 139 140 117 154 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rothmund, J., Scheele, B. 2004 Personenbezeichnungsmodelle auf dem Prüfstand: Lösungsmöglichkeiten für das Genus-Sexus-Problem auf Textebene [Putting gender-neutral reference terms to the test: Constructive solutions to the problem of grammatical vs. referential gender on the textual level] Zeitschrift für Psychologie 212 40 54 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Scheele, B., Gauler, E. 1993 Wählen Wissenschaftler ihre Probleme anders aus als WissenschaftlerInnen? Das Genus-Sexus-Problem als paradigmatischer Fall der linguistischen Relativitätsthese [Do male and female scientists differ in their selection of research problems? The problem of gender-sex bias as a paradigmatic example of linguistic relativity] Sprache & Kognition 12 59 72 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sperber, D., Wilson, D. 1986 Relevance: Communication and cognition Oxford, England: Blackwell First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stahlberg, D., Sczesny, S. 2001 Effekte des generischen Maskulinums und alternativer Sprachformen auf den gedanklichen Einbezug von Frauen [Effects of the generic use of the masculine pronoun and alternative forms of speech on the cognitive visibility of women] Psychologische Rundschau 52 131 140 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Stahlberg, D., Sczesny, S., Braun, F. 2001 Name your favorite musician: Effects of masculine generics and of their alternatives in German Journal of Language and Social Psychology 20 464 469 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sturt, P 2003 The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution Journal of Memory & Language 48 542 562 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Swan, T. 1992 All about Eve: Women in Norwegian newspapers in the 20th century Working Papers on Language, Gender and Sexism 37 54 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar