Abstract
Abstract. This research investigates whether higher-level act identities, which indicate why one is performing a given action or the effects it will have, is more socially valued than lower-level act identities, which indicate how one performs the action. We investigated this question using three complementary paradigms involving self-presentation (Study 1, N = 39), identification (Study 2, N = 79), and a judge (Study 3, N = 63), respectively. Overall, we found that higher-level act identities met with greater social approval. In Studies 2 and 3, we found that higher-level act identities were valued because of their social utility and not associated with social desirability. We discuss the benefits of using a normative approach for understanding action identification processes and the effect of social pressure on endorsements of higher-level act identities.
References
(2013). The Big Two in social judgment and behavior. Social Psychology, 44, 61–62. doi 10.1027/1864-9335/a000137
(2014). Communal and agentic content in social cognition: A dual perspective model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 195–255. doi 10.1016/B978-0-12-800284-1.00004-7
(1990). L’acceptabilité sociale et la connaissance evaluative [
Social acceptability and evaluative knowledge ]. Connexions, 56, 7–16.(2005). Les illusions libérales, individualisme et pouvoir social. Petit traité des grandes illusions [
Liberal delusions, individualism, and social power: A brief treatise on big delusions]. Grenoble, France: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.(2014). The primacy of agency over competence in status perception. Social Psychology, 45, 347–356. doi 10.1027/1864-9335/a000176
(1995). Preference for consistency: The development of a valid measure and the discovery of surprising behavioral implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 318–328. doi 10.1037/ 0022-3514.69.2.318
(2005). Action identification in obsessive-compulsive washers. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 29, 333–341. doi 10.1007/s10608-005-4266-5
(2009). Achievement goal promotion at university: Social desirability and social utility of mastery and performance goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 119–134. doi 10.1037/a0012824
(2005). Normes sociales de jugement et valeur: ancrage sur l’utilité et ancrage sur la désirabilité [
Social norms of judgment and value: Anchorage on utility and desirability]. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale/International Review of Social Psychology, 18(3), 43–79.(2005). Normativeness and individualism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 123–146. doi 10.1002/ejsp.236
(2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
(2003).
The paradigms and their contributions . In N. DuboisJ. L. BeauvoisEds., A sociocognitive approach to social norms (pp. 38–69). London, UK: Routledge.(1970). A theory of human action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
(1981). A self-presentation approach to the fundamental attribution error: The norm of internality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 643–649. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.40.4.643
(2006). What do I think you’re doing? Action identification and mind attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 543–555. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.543
(2013). Jotting down notes or preparing for the future? Extending the action identification theory to an academic context for performance improvement. Social Psychology of Education, 16, 151–154. doi 10.1007/s11218-012-9205-3
(1991). Normativité, conformité et clairvoyance: Leurs effets sur le jugement évaluatif dans un contexte scolaire [
Normativity, conformity, and clear-sightedness: Effects on evaluative judgments in school ]. Perspectives cognitives et conduites sociales, 3, 167–193.(2011). Etude de la valeur sociale attribuée à la préférence de la consistance dans le cadre des relations intergroupes [
The social value attributed to the preference for consistency in the context of intergroup relationships ]. Revue Internationale de Psychologie sociale/International Review of Social Psychology, 24(3), 43–85.(2006). The culture of the new capitalism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
(1999). Normative clearsightedness: A general knowledge of social valuation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 691–706. doi 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199908/09)29:5/6<691::AID-EJSP957>3.CO;2-I
(1977). Internal locus of control as a value. Journal of Research in Personality, 11, 237–242. doi 10.1016/0092-6566(77)90020-4
(2013). The impact of endorsing the belief in a just world on social judgments: The social utility and social desirability of just-world beliefs for self and for others. Social Psychology, 44, 209–218. doi 10.1027/1864-9335/a000105
(1985). A theory of action identification. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1987). What do people think they’re doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review, 94(1), 3–15. doi 10.1037/0033-295X.94.1.3
(1989). Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 660–671. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.660
(2012).
Action identification theory . In P. Van LangeA. W. KruglanskiE. T. HigginsEds., Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 327–348). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.(1992). On winning friends and influencing people: Action identification and self-presentation success. Social Cognition, 10, 335–355. doi 10.1521/soco.1992.10.3.335
(1989). That’s easy for you to say: Action identification and speech fluency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 199–208. doi 10.1037//0022-3514.56.2.199
(1968). Is risk a value?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 101–106. doi 10.1037/ h0025719
(1983). [Identification of the act of using glaucoma medication]. Unpublished raw data.
(1982). [Identification of the act of rearing a child]. Unpublished raw data.
(1986).
Action identification . In R. M. SorrentinoE. T. HigginsEds., Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 550–582). New York: Guilford.(1989). Do alcoholics know what they’re doing? Identifications of the act of drinking. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 197–210. doi 10.1207/s15324834basp1003_1
(1983). Knowing what one is doing: Action identification and self-control. Unpublished manuscript, Trinity University.
