The Impact of Endorsing the Belief in a Just World on Social Judgments
The Social Utility and Social Desirability of Just-World Beliefs for Self and for Others
Abstract
The present research examines the social value attributed to endorsing the belief in a just world for self (BJW-S) and for others (BJW-O) in a Western society. We conducted four studies in which we asked participants to assess a target who endorsed BJW-S vs. BJW-O either strongly or weakly. Results showed that endorsement of BJW-S was socially valued and had a greater effect on social utility judgments than it did on social desirability judgments. In contrast, the main effect of endorsement of BJW-O was to reduce the target’s social desirability. The results also showed that the effect of BJW-S on social utility is mediated by the target’s perceived individualism, whereas the effect of BJW-S and BJW-O on social desirability is mediated by the target’s perceived collectivism.
References
2008). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1063–1065. doi 10.1002/ejsp.574
(2008). On the normativity of expressing the belief in a just world: Empirical evidence. Social Justice Research, 21, 106–118. doi 10.1007/s11211-007-0060x
(2010). Personal and general belief in a just world as judgment norms. International Journal of Psychology, 45, 221–231. doi 10.1080/00207590903281120
(2003). Two spheres of belief in justice: Extensive support for the bidimensional model of belief in a just world. Journal of Personality, 71, 435–463. doi 10.1111/1467-6494.7103007
(2006). Belief in a just world as moderator of hostile attributional bias. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 117–126. doi 10.1348/014466605X37314
(2006). Social judgment norms and social utility: When it is more valuable to be useful than desirable. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 65, 167–180. doi 10.1024/1421-0185.65.3.167
(1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. In , Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 201–233). New York: Academic Press.
(2001). Attitudes toward the poor and attributions for poverty. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 207–227. doi 10.1111/0022-4537. 00209
(1994). Prejudice against fate people: Ideology and self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 882–894. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.882
(1998). Belief in a just world, well-being, and coping with an unjust fate. In , Responses to victimizations and belief in a just world (pp. 87–105). New York: Plenum.
(2003). A sociocognitive approach to social norms. London, UK: Routledge.
(2005). Normes sociales de jugement et valeur. Ancrage sur l’utilité et ancrage sur la désirabilité [
(Social judgment norms and value: Anchoring in utility and anchoring in desirability ]. Revue Internationale de psychologie sociale/International Review of Social Psychology, 18, 43–79.2005). Normativeness and individualism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 123–146. doi 10.1002/ejsp.236
(1993). Just world beliefs in twelve societies. The Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 317–329. doi 10.1080/ 00224545.1993.9712149
(2003). Belief in a just world: Research progress over the past decade. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 795–817. doi 10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00072-7
(1989). Belief in a just world: Review and critique of the individual difference literature. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 365–384. doi 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1989.tb00880.x
(1992). The Protestant work ethic and just world beliefs in Great Britain and India. International Journal of Psychology, 27, 401–416. doi 10.1080/ 00207599208246905
(1991). A crosscultural comparison of British and Japanese Protestant work ethic and just world beliefs. Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 1–14.
(2003). Paradigms of the sociocognitive approach. In , A sociocognitive approach to social norms (pp. 38–69). London: Routledge.
(2005). Experimental research on just-world theory: Problems, developments, and future challenges. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 128–167. doi 10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.128
(2000). Status, religion, and the “belief in a just world”: Comparing African Americans, Latinos, and Whites. Social Science Quarterly, 81, 325–343.
(1981). A self-presentation approach to the fundamental attribution error: The norm of internality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 643–649. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.40.4.643
(1995). Negative illusions: Conceptual clarifications and psychological evidence concerning false consciousness. Political Psychology, 16, 397–424.
(2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 260–265. doi 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00377.x
(2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 13–36. doi 10.1002/ejsp.127
(1986). Beliefs about inequality: American’s view of what is and what ought to be. Hawthorne, NJ: Aldine de Gruyter.
(1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum.
(2003). The justice motive: Where social psychologists found it, how they lost it, and why they may not find it again. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 388–399. doi 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_10
(1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1030–1051. doi 10.1037/0033-2909.85.5.1030
(1991). The construction and preliminary validation of a global belief in a just world scale and the exploratory analysis of the multidimensional belief in a just world scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 1171–1178. doi 10.1016/0191-8869(91)90081-L
(1996). The importance of distinguishing the belief in a just world for self versus for others: Implications for psychological well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 666–677. doi 10.1177/ 0146167296227002
(1981). A comparative study of rules of justice: Japanese versus American. Psychologia, 24, 1–8.
(2009). Justifying inequality: A crosstemporal investigation of U. S. income disparities and just-world beliefs from 1973 to 2006. Social Justice Research, 22, 369–383. doi 10.1007/s11211-009-0103-6
(1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253. doi 10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
(2007). Priming meritocracy and the psychological justification of inequality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 341–351. doi 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.04.009
(2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3–72. doi 10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3
(2010). Impact of the locus of causality and internal control on the social utility of causal explanations. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 69, 171–177. doi 10.1024/1421-0185/a000020
(2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 717–731. doi 10.3758/BF03206553
(1999). When ideology hurts: Effects of belief in the Protestant ethic and feeling overweight on the psychological well-being of women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 402–414. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.402
(1990). Belief in a just world and depression. Sociological Perspectives, 33, 235–252.
(1975). Who believes in a just world? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 65–89. doi 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1975.tb00997
(1977). Psychology and the American ideal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 767–782. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.35.11.767
(2006). The culture of the new capitalism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
(1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
(1995). Horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and methodological refinement. Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 240–275. doi 10.1177/106939719502900302
(2005). Justice for all, or just for me? More evidence of the importance of the self-other distinction in just world beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 637–645. doi 10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.010
(2007). Looking ahead through lenses of justice: The relevance of just-world beliefs to intentions and confidence in the future. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 649–666. doi 10.1348/014466606X166220
(1994). Effects of justice beliefs on cognitive appraisal of and subjective, physiological, and behavioral responses to potential stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 732–740. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.732
(1997). Parallels between competence versus morality related traits and individualistic versus collectivistic values. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 245–256. doi 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199705)27:3<245::AID-EJSP819>3.0.CO;2-H
(