Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Next article
Full-Length Research Report

Commitment and Dyadic Coping in Long-Term Relationships

Published Online:December 01, 2014https://doi.org/10.1024/1662-9647/a000112

Abstract

Background: Previous research focused on relationship commitment as the outcome of high satisfaction, poor alternatives, and high investments. We propose that commitment is a prerequisite in highly satisfied couples, fostering relationship maintenance behavior such as positive dyadic coping. Method: Structural equation models identified the relationship between commitment, relationship satisfaction, and dyadic coping with data from 201 heterosexual couples with an average relationship length of 34 years. Results: The common fate model confirmed that relationship satisfaction mediated the effects between commitment and dyadic coping on a latent dyadic level. Additional analyses revealed that women’s satisfaction was mainly responsible for mediating effects between both partners’ commitment and dyadic coping. Conclusions: Findings support the essentiality of commitment for couples’ maintenance strategies and for consistency in long-term relationships.

References

  • Acker, M. , & Davis, M. H. (1992). Intimacy, passion and commitment in adult romantic relationships: A test of the triangular theory of love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 21–50. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Anderson, C. , Keltner, D. , & John, O. P. (2003). Emotional convergence between people over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1054–1068. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bell, R. A. , Daly, J. A. , & Gonzalez, C. (1987). Affinity-maintenance in marriage and its relationship to women’s marital satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 445–454. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bodenmann, G. (1995). A systemic-transactional conceptualization of stress and coping in couples. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 54, 34–49. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bodenmann, G. (1997). Dyadic coping – a systemic-transactional view of stress and coping among couples: Theory and empirical findings. European Review of Applied Psychology, 47, 137–140. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bodenmann, G. (2005). Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In T.A. Revenson, K. Kayser, G. Bodenmann (Eds.), Couples coping with stress. Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (pp. 33–49). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bodenmann, G. (2008). Dyadisches Coping Inventar (DCI). Test manual [Dyadic Coping Inventory. Manual]. Bern, Göttingen: Huber & Hogrefe Testverlag. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bodenmann, G. , Charvoz, L. , Widmer, K. , & Bradbury, T. N. (2004). Differences in individual and dyadic coping among low and high depressed, partially remitted, and nondepressed persons. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26(2), 75–85. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bodenmann, G. , & Cina, A. (2006). Stress and coping among stable-satisfied, stable-distressed and separated/divorced Swiss couples: A 5-year prospective longitudinal study. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 44, 71–89. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bodenmann, G. , & Kessler, M. (2011). Commitment in close relationships (Comsec). Unpublished questionnaire. Zurich: University of Zurich. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bodenmann, G. , Meuwly, N. , & Kayser, K. (2011). Two conceptualizations of dyadic coping and their potential for predicting relationship quality and individual well-being: A comparison. European Psychologist, 16, 255–266. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Bodenmann, G. , Pihet, S. , & Kayser, K. (2006). The relationship between dyadic coping and marital quality: A 2-year longitudinal study. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 485–493. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bollen, K. A. , & Stine, R. A. (1992). Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 21, 205–229. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bradbury, T. N. , Fincham, F. D. , & Beach, S. R. (2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 964–980. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Canary, D. J. , & Stafford, L. (1992). Relational maintenance strategies and equity in marriage. Communication Monographs, 59, 243–267. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Canary, D. J. , & Stafford, L., (1994). Maintaining relationships through strategic and routine interaction. In D. J. Canary, L. Stafford (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance. New York: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dainton, M. , & Aylor, B. (2002). Routine and strategic maintenance efforts: Behavioral patterns,variations associated with relational length, and the prediction of relational characteristics. Communication Monographs, 69, 52–66. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Davila, J. , Bradbury, T. N. , Cohan, C. L. , & Tochluk, S. (1997). Marital functioning and depressive symptoms: Evidence for a stress generation model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 849–861. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Finkel, E. J. , Rusbult, C. E. , Kumashiro, M. , & Hannon, P. A. (2002). Dealing with betrayal in close relationships: Does commitment promote forgiveness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 956–974. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Floyd, F. J. , & Wasner, G. H. (1994). Social exchange, equity, and commitment: Structural equation modeling of dating relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 8, 55–73. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Frank, E. , & Brandstätter, V. (2002). Approach vs. avoidance: Different types of commitment in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 208–221. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 93–98. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Herzberg, P. Y. (2013). Coping in relationships: The interplay between individual and dyadic coping and their effects on relationship satisfaction. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 26, 136–153. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Johnson, M. D. (2002). The observation of specific affect in marital interactions: Psychometric properties of a coding system and a rating system. Psychological Assessment, 14, 423–438. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Johnson, M. P. (1991). Commitment to personal relationships. In W. H. Jones, D.W. Perlman (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships (Vol. 3, pp. 117–143). London: Jessica Kingsley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Landis, M. , Peter-Wight, M. , Martin, M. , & Bodenmann, G. (2013). Dyadic coping and marital satisfaction of older spouses in long-term marriage. GeroPsych, 26, 39–47. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1999). Stress and emotion. New York: Springer Publishing. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ledermann, T. , & Bodenmann, G. (2006). Moderator- und Mediatoreffekte bei dyadischen Daten. Zwei Erweiterungen des Akteur-Partner-Interdependenz-Modells [Moderator and mediator effects in dyadic research: Two extensions of the actor-partner interdependence model]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 37, 27–40. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Ledermann, T. , Bodenmann, G. , Rudaz, M. , & Bradbury, T. N. (2010). Stress, communication, and marital quality in couples. Family Relations, 59, 195–206. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ledermann, T. , & Kenny, D. A., (2011). The common fate model for dyadic data: Variations of a theoretically important but underutilized model. Journal of Family Psychology, 26, 140–148. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ledermann, T. , & Macho, S. (2009). Mediation in dyadic data at the level of the dyads: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 661–670. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ledermann, T. , Macho, S. , & Kenny, D. A. (2011). Assessing mediation in dyadic data using the actor-partner interdependence model. Structural Equation Modeling, 18, 595–612. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lemieux, R. , & Hale, J. L. (1999). Intimacy, passion, and commitment in young romantic relationships: Successfully measuring the triangular theory of love. Psychological Reports, 85, 497–503. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Meuwly, N. , Bodenmann, G. , Germann, J. , Bradbury, T. M. , Ditzen, B. , & Heinrichs, M. (2012). Dyadic coping accelerates cortisol stress recovery: Highly anxious women benefit less. Journal of Family Psychology, 26, 937–947. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K. , & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus User’s Guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nolen-Hoeksema, S. , & Jackson, B. (2001). Mediators of the gender difference in rumination. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 37–47. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ogolsky, B. (2009). Deconstructing the association between relationship maintenance and commitment: Testing two competing models. Personal Relationships, 16, 99–115. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Papp, L. M. , & Witt, N. L. (2010). Romantic partners’ individual coping strategies and dyadic coping: Implications for relationship functioning. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 551–559. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pope, A. L. (2013). Intimate relationship commitment; An integrated conceptual model. Journal of Couple and Relationship Therapy: Innovations in Clinical and Educational Interventions, 12, 270–289. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rabby, M. K. (2007). Relational maintenance and the influence of commitment in online and offline relationships. Communication Studies, 58, 315–337. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Reis, H. T. , & Collins, N. (2000). Measuring relationship properties and interactions relevant to social support. In S. Cohen, L. G. Underwood, & B. H. Gottlieb (Eds.), Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists (pp. 136–192). New York: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Røsand, G.-M. B. , Slinning, K. , Eberhard-Gran, M. , Røysamb, E. , & Tambs, K. (2012). The buffering effect of relationship satisfaction on emotional distress in couples. BMC Public Health, 12, 66. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172–186. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 429–438. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rusbult, C. E. , & Buunk, B. P. (1993). Commitment processes in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 175–204. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rusbult, C. E. , Drigotas, S. M. , & Verette, J. (1994). The investment model: An interdependence analysis of commitment processes and relationship maintenance phenomena. In D. Canary, L. Stafford (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 115–139). New York: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rusbult, C. E. , Johnson, D. J. , & Morrow, G. D. (1986). Predicting satisfaction and commitment in adult romantic involvements: An assessment of the generalizability of the investment model. Social Psychology Quarterly, 49, 81–89. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rusbult, C. E. , Olsen, N. , Davis, J. L. , & Hannon, P. (2001). Commitment and relationship maintenance mechanisms. In J. H. Harvey, A. Wenzel (Eds.), Close romantic relationships: Maintenance and enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rusbult, C. E. , Verette, J. , Whitney, G. A. , Slovik, L. F. , & Lipkus, I. (1991). Accommodation processes in close relationships: Theory and preliminary empirical evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 53–78. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rusbult, C. E. , & Zembrodt, I. M. (1983). Responses to dissatisfaction in romantic involvements: A multidimensional scaling analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 274–293. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sander, J. , & Böcker, S. (1993). Die Deutsche Form der Relationship Assessment Scale (RAS): Eine kurze Skala zur Messung der Zufriedenheit in einer Partnerschaft [The German version of the Relationship Assessment Scale (RAS): A short scale for measuring satisfaction in a dyadic relationship]. Diagnostica, 39, 55–62. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schneewind, K. A. , & Wunderer, E. (2003). Prozessmodelle der Partnerschaftsentwicklung [Process models of partnership development]. In H.-W. Bierhoff, I. Grau (Hrsg.), Sozialpsychologie der Partnerschaft (S. 221–255). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schoebi, D. , Karney, B. R. , & Bradbury, T. N. (2012). Stability and change in the first 10 years of marriage: Does commitment confer benefits beyond the effects of satisfaction? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 729–742. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Slotter, E. B. , Finkel, E. J. , DeWall, C. N. , Pond, R. S. , Lambert, N. M. , Bodenhausen, G. V. , & Fincham, F. D. (2012). Putting the brakes on aggression toward a romantic partner: The inhibitory influence of relationship commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 291–305. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290–312. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sprenkle, D. H. , & Olson, D. H. L. (1978). Circumplex model of marital systems: An empirical study of clinic and nonclinic couples. Journal of Marriage and Family Counseling, 4, 59–74. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93, 119–135. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Thibaut, J. W. , & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Thompson-Hayes, M. , & Webb, L. M. (2004). Theory in progress: Commitment under construction: A dyadic and communicative model of marital commitment. Journal of Family Communication, 4, 249–260. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tran, S. , & Simpson, J. A. (2009). Pro-relationship maintenance behaviors: The joint roles of attachment and commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 685–698. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Van Lange, P. A. M. , Agnew, C. R. , Harinck, F. , & Steemers, G. E. M. (1997). From game theory to real life: How social value orientation affects willingness to sacrifice in ongoing close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1330–1344. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Van Lange, P. A. M. , Rusbult, C. E. , Drigotas, S. M. , Arriaga, X. B. , Witcher, B. S. , Cox, C. L. (1997). Willingness to sacrifice in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1373–1395. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Weigel, D. J. , & Ballard-Reisch, D. S. (2008). Relational maintenance, satisfaction, and commitment in marriages: An actor-partner analysis. Journal of Family Communication, 9, 212–229. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wieselquist, J. , Rusbult, C. E. , Foster, C. A. , & Angew, C. R. (1999). Commitment, prorelationship behavior, and trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 942–966. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Yoshimoto, D. K. , Shapiro, A. , O’Brien, K. , & Gottman, J. M. (2005). Nonverbal communication coding systems of committed couples. In J. A. Harrigan, R. Rosenthal, & K. R. Scherer (Eds.), The new handbook of methods in nonverbal behavior research (pp. 369–397). New York: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar