Skip to main content
Special Section: Romantic Relationships

Two Conceptualizations of Dyadic Coping and Their Potential for Predicting Relationship Quality and Individual Well-Being

A Comparison

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000068

Dyadic coping has received increased attention during the last decade, both in theory and empirical studies. Two main models of dyadic coping are proposed in the current literature: (1) a comparative approach in which each partner’s individual coping is compared with the other’s individual coping with regard to congruence or discrepancy and (2) a systemic model where dyadic coping is conceptualized as an interactive and reciprocal process. In this study, the predictive power of these two different models of dyadic coping is examined regarding relationship quality and well-being. The study is conducted with 443 Swiss couples. Results reveal that both dyadic coping measures are related to relationship quality and psychological well-being. However the systemic dyadic coping measure is a stronger predictor than the discrepancy measure for relationship quality. Both measures show weaker associations with well-being. Findings are discussed with regard to theoretical issues and their implication for practical work.

References

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2006). Amos (Version 7.0) [Computer Program]. Chicago, IL: SPSS. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Acitelli, L. K., Badr, H. (2005). My illness or our illness? Attending to the relationship when one partner is ill. In T. Revenson, K. Kayser, G. Bodenmann (Eds.), Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (pp. 121–136). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baas, S., Schmitt, M. (2004). Die Bedeutung der Einkommensverteilung für die Ehezufriedenheit langjährig verheirateter Ehepaare [The significance of income distribution for marital satisfaction in long-term marriages]. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung, 3, 268–288. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Badr, H. (2004). Coping in marital dyads: A contextual perspective on the role of gender and health. Personal Relationships, 11, 197–211. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Badr, H., Carmack Taylor, C. L. (2008). Effects of relationship maintenance on psychological distress and dyadic adjustment among couples coping with lung cancer. Health Psychology, 27, 616–627. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Badr, H., Carmack Taylor, C. L., Kashy, D. A., Cristofanilli, M., Revenson, T. A. (2010). Dyadic coping in metastatic breast cancer. Health Psychology, 29, 169–180. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Barbarin, O. A. (1983). Coping with ecological transitions by black families: A psychosocial model. Journal of Community Psychology, 11, 308–322. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Barbarin, O. A., Hughes, D., Chesler, M. A. (1985). Stress, coping, and marital functioning among partners of children with cancer. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 473–480. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Berg, C. A., Meegan, S. P., Deviney, F. P. (1998). A social contextual model of coping with everyday problems across the life span. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 22, 239–261. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Berg, C. A., Upchurch, R. (2007). A developmental-contextual model of couples coping with chronic illness across the adult life span. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 920–954. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Berg, C. A., Wiebe, D. J., Butner, J., Bloor, L., Bradstreet, C., Upchurch, R., … Patton, G. (2008). Collaborative coping and daily mood in couples dealing with prostate cancer. Psychology and Aging, 23, 505–516. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Berghuis, J. P., Stanton, A. L. (2002). Adjustment to a dyadic stressor: A longitudinal study of coping and depressive symptoms in infertile couples over an insemination attempt. Journal of Counsulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 433–438. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bodenmann, G. (1995). A systemic-transactional view of stress and coping in couples. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 54, 34–49. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bodenmann, G. (1997). Dyadic coping – a systemic-transactional view of stress and coping among couples: Theory and empirical findings. European Review of Applied Psychology, 47, 137–140. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bodenmann, G. (2000). Stress und Coping bei Paaren. Stress and coping in couples. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bodenmann, G. (2005). Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In T. Revenson, K. Kayser, G. Bodenmann (Eds.), Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (pp. 33–50). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bodenmann, G. (2008). Dyadisches Coping Inventar. Test Manual [Dyadic Coping Inventory. Test Manual]. Bern, Switzerland: Huber. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bodenmann, G. (2010). New themes in couple therapy: The role of stress, coping and social support. In K. Hahlweg, M. Grawe, D. H. Baucom (Eds.), Enhancing couples. The shape of couple therapy to come (pp. 142–156). Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe Publishing. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bodenmann, G., Cina, A. (2006). Stress and coping among stable-satisfied, stable-distressed and separated/divorced Swiss couples: A 5-year prospective longitudinal study. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 44, 71–89. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bodenmann, G., Pihet, S., Kayser, K. (2006). The Relationship between Dyadic Coping, Marital Quality and Well-being: A Two Year Longitudinal Study. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 485–493. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bodenmann, G., Bradbury, T. N., Pihet, S. (2009). Relative contributions of treatment-related changes in communication skills and dyadic coping skills to the longitudinal course of marriage in the framework of marital distress prevention. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 50, 1–21. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bodenmann, G., Meuwly, N., Bradbury, T. N., Gmelch, S., Ledermann, T. (2010). Stress, anger, and verbal aggression in intimate relationships: Moderating effects of individual and dyadic coping. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 408–424. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., Weintraub, J. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267–283. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Coyne, J. C., Smith, D. A. F. (1991). Couples coping with a myocardial infarction: A contextual perspective on wives’ distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 404–412. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Coyne, J. C., Rohrbaugh, M. J., Shoham, V., Sonnega, J. S., Nickla, J. M., Cranford, J. A. (2001). Prognostic importance of marital quality for survival of congestive heart failure. The American Journal of Cardiology, 88, 526–529. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cutrona, C. E., Gardner, K. A. (2006). Stress in couples: The process of dyadic coping. In A. L. Vangelisti, D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 501–516). Cambridge, UK: University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • DeLongis, A., O’Brien, T. (1990). An interpersonal framework for stress and coping: An application to the families of Alzheimer’s patients. In M. A. P. Stephens, J. H. Crowther, S. E. Hobfoll, D. L. Tennenbaum (Eds.), Stress and coping in later-life families (pp. 221–240). New York, NY: Hemisphere Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Giunta, C. T., Compas, B. E. (1993). Coping in marital dyads: Patterns and associations with psychological symptoms. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 1011–1017. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gmelch, S., Bodenmann, G. (2007). Dyadisches Coping in Selbst- und Fremdwahrnehmung als Prädiktoren für Partnerschaftsqualität und Befinden [Dyadic coping in self-perception and partner’s perception and its association with relationship quality and well-being]. Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie, 15, 177–186. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Goldberg, D. P., Williams, P. (1988). A user’s guide to the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor, UK: NFER/Nelson. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hagedoorn, M., Sanderman, R., Bolks, H. N., Tuinstra, J., Coyne, J. C. (2008). Distress in couples coping with cancer: A meta-analysis and critical review of role and gender effects. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 1–30. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hahlweg, K. (1996). Fragebogen zur Partnerschaftsdiagnostik (FPD) [Questionnaire for assessing relationship quality]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hochfilzer, J. E. (2010). Zufriedenheit in Paarbeziehungen. Eine Studie zum Einfluss von dyadischem Coping, Equity und Kommunikation [Satisfaction in close relationships: A study on the influence of dyadic coping, equity, and communication]. Saarbrücken: Verlag Dr. Müller. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Karney, B. R., Story, L. B., Bradbury, T. N. (2005). Marriages in context: Interactions between chronic and acute stress among newlyweds. In T. A. Revenson, K. Kayser, G. Bodenmann (Eds.), Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (pp. 13–32). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kayser, K. (2005). Enhancing dyadic coping during a time of crisis: A theory-based intervention with breast cancer patients and their partners. In T. A. Revenson, K. Kayser, G. Bodenmann (Eds.), Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (pp. 175–194). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kayser, K., Watson, L. E., Andrade, J. T. (2007). Cancer as a “we-disease”: Examining the process of coping from a relational perspective. Family, Systems, & Health, 25, 404–418. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Koch, B., Hauschild, S., Schmidt-Denter, U. (2001). Dynamische Abhängigkeiten in der Paarbeziehung beim Übergang zur Elternschaft Dynamic dependencies in couple’s relationships during the transmission to parenthoofd. Munic: 2. Munic Symposium of Family Psychology, Poster Presentation. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Künzler, A., Zindel, A., Bargetzi, M., Znoji, H. J. (2005, September). Couples Coping with a recent diagnosis of cancer. Annual Conference of the European Health Psychology Society. Galway, Ireland Poster. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kuijer, R. G., Ybema, J. F., Buunk, B. P., De Jong, G. M., Thijs-Boer, F., Sanderman, R. (2000). Active engagement, protective buffering, and overprotection: Three ways of giving support by intimate partners of patients with cancer. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 256–275. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Manne, S. L., Norton, T. R., Ostroff, J. S., Winkel, G., Fox, K., Grana, G. (2007). Protective buffering and psychological distress among couples coping with breast cancer: The moderating role of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 380–388. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Naumann, S. (2004). Partnerschaft und Gesundheit. Die Bedeutung von Konfliktgesprächen und subjektiver Beziehungsqualität für die Gesundheit der Partner Close relationships and health: The significance of conflict discussions and subjective relationship quality for partners’ health. Unpublished dissertation. Braunschweig: Technische Universität Braunschweig. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • O’Brien, T., DeLongis, A. (1997). Coping with chronic stress: An interpersonal perspective. In B. Gottlieb (Ed.), Coping with chronic stress (pp. 162–190). New York, NY: Plenum Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pakenham, K. I. (1998). Couple coping and adjustment to multiple sclerosis in care receiver-carer dyads. Family Relations, 47, 269–277. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peterson, B. D., Newton, C. R., Rosen, K. H., Schulman, R. S. (2006). Coping processes of couples experiencing infertility. Family Relations, 55, 227–239. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Randall, A. K., Bodenmann, G. (2009). The role of stress on close relationships and marital satisfaction. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 105–115. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Revenson, T. A. (1994). Social support and marital coping with chronic illness. Annals of Behavioural Medicine, 16, 122–130. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Revenson, T. A. (2003). Scenes from a marriage: Examining support, coping, and gender within the context of chronic illness. In J. Suls, K. A. Wallston (Eds.), Social Psychological Foundations of Health and Illness (pp. 530–559). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Revenson, T. A., Kayser, K., Bodenmann, G. (2005). Emerging perspectives on couples’ coping with stress. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rohrbaugh, M. J., Cranford, J. A., Shoham, V., Nicklas, J. M., Sonnega, J. S., Coyne, J. C. (2002). Couples coping with congestive heart failure: Role and gender differences in psychological distress. Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 3–13. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schneewind, K. A., Kruse, J. (2002). Die Paarklimaskalen (PKS). Manual [Atmosphere of couple relation scale. Manual]. Bern, Switzerland: Huber. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitz, G. S. (1998). Cardiac patients and their spouses: Towards a perspective of dyadic coping. In R. Schwarzer (Ed.), Advances in Health Psychology Research. Berlin, Germany: Free University. CD–ROM Volume. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schwarzer, C., Busch, B. (2005). Dyadic coping with retirement in elderly couples. International Association of Applied Psychology. Newsletter, 17, 13–23. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Story, L. B., Bradbury, T. N. (2004). Understanding marriage and stress: Essential questions and challenges. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1139–1162. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Terry, D. J. (1989). Stress, coping, and adaptation in married couples. Australia: The University of Queensland Unpublished doctoral dissertation. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Widmer, K., Bodenmann, G. (2000). Alltagsstress, Coping und Befindlichkeit: Paare im Geschlechtervergleich Daily hassles, coping, and well-being: Gender differences in couples. Zeitschrift für Medizinische Psychologie, 1, 17–26. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Würz, J., Brähler, E., Kapellen, T., Galler, A., Kiess, W. (2006). Dyadisches Coping bei Eltern von Kindern und Jugendlichen mit Diabetes mellitus Typ 1. Kinder und Jugendmedizin, 2, 81–92. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wunderer, E. (2003). Partnerschaft zwischen Anspruch und Wirklichkeit Relationships between expectancies and reality. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz-PVU. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wunderer, E., Schneewind, K. A. (2008). The relationship between marital standards, dyadic coping and marital satisfaction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 462–476. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar