Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Dialog

Beware of “Populist Science”! – A Commentary on Bal (2020)

Published Online:July 30, 2020https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000334
Free first page

Literatur

  • Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38 (4), 932 – 968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311436079 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Aldag, R. J. (2019). What could critical theory have done to help my father?(Absolutely nothing). Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 12, 482 – 486. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2019.120 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Alessandri, G., Truxillo, D. M., Tisak, J., Fagnani, C., & Borgogni, L. (2019). Within-individual age-related trends, cycles, and event-driven changes in job performance: A career-span perspective. Journal of Business and Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-019-09645-8 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Alliger, G. M. (2019). Deriving meaning from work is neither new nor bad. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 12, 444 – 447. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2019.70 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Andrei, D. M., Van den Broeck, A., & Parker, S. K. (2019). Good work, poor work? We need to go far beyondcapitalism to answer this question. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 12, 463 – 468. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2019.90 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Anseel, F., Van Lysebetten, S., Van Es, R., & Rosseel, J. (2018). Our neoliberal fantasies? A preliminary test of research trends in leading journals in work and organizational psychology. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27 (5), 549 – 551. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1496082 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bakker, A. B., & Bal, M. (2010). Weekly work engagement and performance: A study among starting teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83 (1), 189 – 206. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X402596 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bal, P. M. (2010). Psychological contract breach and work performance: Is social exchange a buffer or an intensifier? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25 (3), 252 – 273. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683941011023730 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bal, P. M. (2020). Why we should stop measuring performance and well-being. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 64, 198 – 202. https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000333 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bal, P. M., & Dóci, E. (2018). Neoliberal ideology in work and organizational psychology. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27 (5), 536 – 548. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1449108 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bal, P. M., Kooij, D. T., & De Jong, S. B. (2013). How do developmental and accommodative HRM enhance employee engagement and commitment? The role of psychological contract and SOC strategies. Journal of Management Studies, 50 (4), 545 – 572. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bledow, R., Schmitt, A., Frese, M., & Kühnel, J. (2011). The affective shift model of work engagement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96 (6), 1246 – 1257. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024532 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance. In N. SchmittW. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 35 – 79). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dalal, R. S. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90 (6), 1241 – 1255. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Duffy, R. D., Blustein, D. L., Allan, B. A., Diemer, M. M., & Cinamon, R. G. (2020). Introduction to the special issue: A cross-cultural exploration of decent work. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.103351 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Guest, D., & Grote, G. (2018). Captured by neo-liberalism: What hope for WOP? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27 (5), 554 – 555. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1488685 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Humphrey, R. H., Miao, C., & Quian, S. (2019). Work: What is it good for? Almost everything! Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 12, 460 – 462. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2019.91 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Keith, N. (2018). Undesirable effects of goal setting on perceived fairness, commitment, and unethical behavior. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 62, 97 – 107. https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000267 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Kooij, D. T., Nijssen, H., Bal, P. M., & van der Kruijssen, D. T. (2020). Crafting an interesting job: Stimulating an active role of older workers in enhancing their daily work engagement and job performance. Work, Aging and Retirement. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waaa001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lam, C. F., Spreitzer, G., & Fritz, C. (2014). Too much of a good thing: Curvilinear effect of positive affect on proactive behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35 (4), 530 – 546. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1906 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lapierre, L. M., Spector, P. E., & Leck, J. D. (2005). Sexual versus nonsexual workplace aggression and victims’ overall job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10 (2), 155 – 169. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.10.2.155 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Montano, D., Reeske, A., Franke, F., & Hüffmeier, J. (2017). Leadership, followers’ mental health and job performance in organizations: A comprehensive meta-analysis from an occupational health perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38 (3), 327 – 350. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2124 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mumby, D. K. (2019). Work: What is it good for? (Absolutely nothing) – a critical theorist’s perspective. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 12, 429 – 443. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2019.69 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Parker, S. K. (2014). Beyond motivation: Job and work design for development, health, ambidexterity, and more. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 661 – 691. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115208 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rodrigues, F. R., Cunha, M. P., Castanheira, F., Bal, P. M., & Jansen, P. G. (2020). Person-job fit across the work lifespan – the case of classical ballet dancers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 118, 103400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103400 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rodrik, D. (2018). Populism and the economics of globalization. Journal of International Business Policy, 1(1 – 2), 12 – 33. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-018-0001-4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rudolph, C. W., & Zacher, H. (2018). What are the mechanisms? The black box of neoliberalism. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27 (5), 556 – 557. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1482873 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sonnentag, S. (2015). Dynamics of well-being. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 261 – 293. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111347 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Thoresen, C. J., Bradley, J. C., Bliese, P. D., & Thoresen, J. D. (2004). The big five personality traits and individual job performance growth trajectories in maintenance and transitional job stages. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89 (5), 835 – 853. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.835 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vardi, Y., & Wiener, Y. (1996). Misbehavior in organizations: A motivational framework. Organization Science, 7 (2), 151 – 165. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.2.151 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Weber, W. G., Unterrainer, C., & Höge, T. (2019). Psychological research on organisational democracy: A meta‐analysis of individual, organisational, and societal outcomes. Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12205 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Welsh, D. T., & Ordóñez, L. D. (2014). The dark side of consecutive high performance goals: Linking goal setting, depletion, and unethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123 (2), 79 – 89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.07.006 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zacher, H. (2019). A critical perspective on “critical organizational scholarship.” Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 12 (4), 456 – 459. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2019.89 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zacher, H., & Frese, M. (2018). Action regulation theory: Foundations, current knowledge, and future directions. In D. S. OneN. R. AndersoC. ViswesvaraH. K. Sinangil (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 2: Organizational psychology, pp. 80 – 102). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar