Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/0943-8149/a000132

Das Kohärenzgefühl wurde ursprünglich als globale, unspezifische Lebensorientierung eingeführt, die zwischen Gesundheitsressourcen und Stressbewältigung vermittelt. Die drei Dimensionen Verstehbarkeit, Handhabbarkeit und Sinnhaftigkeit werden hier auf die Ebene der Arbeit und Organisation übertragen, um mit dem arbeitsbezogenen Kohärenzgefühl (Work-SoC) einen breit einsetzbaren Indikator gesundheitsrelevanter Arbeitsbedingungen zu bilden. Es wird eine 9-Item-Skala zur Erfassung des Work-SoC vorgestellt, die in acht Organisationen (n = 1084 Mitarbeitende) eingesetzt wurde. Die interne Konsistenz der Work-SoC-Gesamtskala lag bei α = .83. Die drei SoC-Dimensionen konnten abgebildet werden, wobei die Subskalen ein α = zwischen .72 und .84 aufwiesen. Es wurden die erwarteten quer- und längsschnittlichen Zusammenhänge mit spezifischen arbeitsbezogenen Belastungen und Ressourcen, sowie negativen und positiven Gesundheitsoutcomes gefunden. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass das Work-SoC ein nützlicher Indikator für die gesundheitsrelevante Arbeitsumgebung eines Individuums ist.


Work-SoC–Development and Validation of a Scale Measuring Work-Related Sense of Coherence

Originally, the sense of coherence was introduced as a global, nonspecific life orientation that mediates between health resources and coping with stress. In the current paper, the three dimensions comprehensibility, manageability and meaningfulness were applied to work and organization, forming the work-related sense of coherence (Work-SoC) as a broadly applicable indicator of health-relevant working conditions. A 9-item-scale for the assessment of the Work-SoC was applied in eight organisations (n = 1,084 employees). The internal consistency of the Work-SoC-Scale was α = .83. The three SoC dimensions could be reproduced, with α = ranging from .72 to .84 for the subscales. The predicted cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships with specific job demands and job resources as well as negative and positive health outcomes were confirmed. Overall, the results showed that Work-SoC is a valuable indicator of health-related quality of working life.

Literatur

  • Albertsen, K., Nielsen, M. L. &Borg, V. (2001). The Danish psychosocial work environment and symptoms of stress: The main, mediating and moderating role of sense of coherence. Work & Stress, 15, 241 – 253. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Allen, N. J. &Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1 – 18. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Antonovsky, A. (1979). Health, stress, and coping: New perspectives on mental and physical well-being. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unraveling the mystery of health: How people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Antonovsky, A. (1996). The salutogenic model as a theory to guide health promotion. Health Promotion International, 11(1), 11 – 18. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Antonovsky, A. (1997). Salutogenese: zur Entmystifizierung der Gesundheit. Deutsche, erweiterte Ausgabe von A. Franke. Tübingen: dgvt. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Antonovsky, A. &Sourani, T. (1988). Family sense of coherence and family adaptation. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 79 – 92. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2011). IBM SPSS Amos 20 user’s guide. Chicago: IBM Software Group. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Artinian, B. M. (1997). Situational sense of coherence: Development and measurement of the construct. In B. M. Artinian & M. M. Conger (Eds.), The Intersystem Model: Integrating theory and practice. Thousand Oaks: SAGE. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bastien, C. H., Vallieres, A. & Morin, C. M. (2001). Validation of the Insomnia Severity Index as an outcome measure for insomnia research. Sleep Medicine, 3, 297 – 307. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bauer, G. &Jenny, G. J. (2007). Development, implementation and dissemination of occupational health management (OHM): Putting salutogenesis into practice. In S. McIntyre & J. Houdmondt (Eds.), Occupational health psychology. European perspectives on research, education and practice (Vol. 2). Castelo da Maia: ISMAI. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bengel, J., Strittmatter, R. &Willmann, H. (1998). Was erhält Menschen gesund? Antonovskys Modell der Salutogenese–Diskussionsstand und Stellenwert. Köln: BZgA. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bowen, G. L., Richman, J. M., Brewstert, A. & Bowen, N. (1998). Sense of school coherence, perceptions of danger at school, and teacher support among youth at risk of school failure. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 15(4), 276 – 286. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brauchli, R. B., Füllemann, D., Jenny, G. J. &Bauer, G. F. (in Vorbereitung). Developing an expanded job demands-resources model predicting negative and positive health. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386 – 400. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F. &Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 499 – 512. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eberz, S., Becker, R. &Antoni, C. H. (2011). Kohärenzerleben im Arbeitskontext–Ein nützliches Konstrukt für die ABO-Psychologie? Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 55, 115 – 131. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Eriksson, M. (2007). Unravelling the mystery of salutogenesis. The evidence base of the salutogenic research as measured by Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence scale (Doctoral thesis). Äbo Akademi University Vasa, Faculty of Social and Caring Science, Department of Social Policy. Folkhälsan Research Centre. Health Promotion Research Programme, Research Report 2007: 1. Turku: Folkhälsan First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eriksson, M. &Lindström, B. (2005). Validity of Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale: A systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 59, 460 – 466. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eriksson, M. &Lindström, B. (2006). Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale and the relation with health: A systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 60, 376 – 381. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Faltermaier, T. (2005). Gesundheitspsychologie. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Feldt, T. (1997). The role of sense of coherence in well-being at work: Analyses of main and moderator effects. Work and Stress, 11, 134 – 147. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Feldt, T., Kinnunen, U. & Mauno, S. (2000). A mediational model of sense of coherence in the work context: A one-year follow-up study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 461 – 476. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Franke, A. (1997). Zum Stand der konzeptionellen und empirischen Entwicklung des Salutogenesekonzepts. In A. Antonovsky, Salutogenese: Zur Entmystifizierung der Gesundheit (dt., erw. Ausgabe, hrsg. von A. Franke). Tübingen: dgvt. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Frese, M. (1989). Gütekriterien zur Operationalisierung von sozialer Unterstützung am Arbeitsplatz. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaften, 43, 112 – 121. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gesundheitsförderung Schweiz. (2004). KMU-vital, Programm für gesunde Betriebe. Zugriff am: 10. 11. 14. Verfügbar unter: www.kmu-vital.ch, www.pme-vital.ch First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gräser, S. (2003). Hochschule und Gesundheit: Salutogenese am Arbeitsplatz Universität. Lengerich: Pabst. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Höge, T. &Büssing, A. (2004). The impact of sense of coherence and negative affectivity on the work stressor–strain relationship. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 9(3), 195 – 205. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L. &Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit-indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling, 6(1), 1 – 55. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jacobshagen, N., Oehler, N., Stettler, E., Liechti, S. & Semmer, N. K. (November, 2008). Appreciation at work: Measurement and associations with well-being. Poster presented at the 8th Conference of the European Academy of Occupational Health Psychology: Valencia, Spain. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jenny, G. J., Brauchli, R., Inauen, A., Füllemann, D., Fridrich, A., &Bauer, G. F. (2014). Process and outcome evaluation of an organizational-level stress management intervention in Switzerland. Health Promotion International. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dat091 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kalimo, R., Pahkin, K. Mutanen, P., &Toppinen-Tanner, S. (2003). Staying well or burning out at work: Work characteristics and personal resources as long-term predictors. Work & Stress, 17(2), 109 – 122. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kinman, G. (2008). Work stressors, health and sense of coherence in UK academic employees. Educational Psychology, 28, 823 – 835. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nash, J. K. (2002). Neighborhood effects on sense of school coherence and educational behavior in students at risk of school failure. Children and Schools, 24, 73 – 89. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sarason, S. B. (1974). The psychological sense of community. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B. &Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701 – 716. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schumacher, J., Wilz, G., Gunzelmann, T. &Brähler, E. (2000). Die Sense of Coherence Scale von Antonovsky. Teststatistische Überprüfung in einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsstichprobe und Konstruktion einer Kurzskala. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 50, 472 – 482. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Semmer, N. K., Zapf, D. & Dunckel, H. (1995). Assessing stress at work: A framework and an instrument. In O. Svane & C. Johansen (Eds.), Work and health: Scientific basis of progress in the working environment (pp. 105 – 113). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Udris, I. &Rimann, M. (1999). SAA und SALSA: Zwei Fragebogen zur subjektiven Arbeitsanalyse. In H. Dunckel (Hrsg.), Handbuch psychologischer Arbeitsanalyseverfahren. Ein praxisorientierter Überblick (S. 397 – 419). Zürich: vdf Hochschulverlag. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Udris, I. &Rimann, M. (2000). Das Kohärenzgefühl: Gesundheitsressource oder Gesundheit selbst? Strukturelle und funktionale Aspekte von SOC und ein Validierungsversuch. In H. Wydler, P. Kolip &T. Abel (Hrsg.), Salutogenese und Kohärenzgefühl. Grundlagen, Empirie und Praxis eines gesundheitswissenschaftlichen Konzepts (S. 129 – 147). Weinheim: Juventa. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Vogt, K., Jenny, G. J. &Bauer, G. F. (2013). Comprehensibility, manageability and meaningfulness at work construct validity of a scale measuring work-related sense of coherence. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 39(1), 1 – 8. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Warr, P. (1990). The measurement of well-being and other aspects of mental health. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(3), 193 – 210. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar