Work-SoC–Entwicklung und Validierung einer Skala zur Erfassung des arbeitsbezogenen Kohärenzgefühls
Abstract
Das Kohärenzgefühl wurde ursprünglich als globale, unspezifische Lebensorientierung eingeführt, die zwischen Gesundheitsressourcen und Stressbewältigung vermittelt. Die drei Dimensionen Verstehbarkeit, Handhabbarkeit und Sinnhaftigkeit werden hier auf die Ebene der Arbeit und Organisation übertragen, um mit dem arbeitsbezogenen Kohärenzgefühl (Work-SoC) einen breit einsetzbaren Indikator gesundheitsrelevanter Arbeitsbedingungen zu bilden. Es wird eine 9-Item-Skala zur Erfassung des Work-SoC vorgestellt, die in acht Organisationen (n = 1084 Mitarbeitende) eingesetzt wurde. Die interne Konsistenz der Work-SoC-Gesamtskala lag bei α = .83. Die drei SoC-Dimensionen konnten abgebildet werden, wobei die Subskalen ein α = zwischen .72 und .84 aufwiesen. Es wurden die erwarteten quer- und längsschnittlichen Zusammenhänge mit spezifischen arbeitsbezogenen Belastungen und Ressourcen, sowie negativen und positiven Gesundheitsoutcomes gefunden. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass das Work-SoC ein nützlicher Indikator für die gesundheitsrelevante Arbeitsumgebung eines Individuums ist.
Originally, the sense of coherence was introduced as a global, nonspecific life orientation that mediates between health resources and coping with stress. In the current paper, the three dimensions comprehensibility, manageability and meaningfulness were applied to work and organization, forming the work-related sense of coherence (Work-SoC) as a broadly applicable indicator of health-relevant working conditions. A 9-item-scale for the assessment of the Work-SoC was applied in eight organisations (n = 1,084 employees). The internal consistency of the Work-SoC-Scale was α = .83. The three SoC dimensions could be reproduced, with α = ranging from .72 to .84 for the subscales. The predicted cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships with specific job demands and job resources as well as negative and positive health outcomes were confirmed. Overall, the results showed that Work-SoC is a valuable indicator of health-related quality of working life.
Literatur
(2001). The Danish psychosocial work environment and symptoms of stress: The main, mediating and moderating role of sense of coherence. Work & Stress, 15, 241 – 253.
(1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1 – 18.
(1979). Health, stress, and coping: New perspectives on mental and physical well-being. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
(1987). Unraveling the mystery of health: How people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
(1996). The salutogenic model as a theory to guide health promotion. Health Promotion International, 11(1), 11 – 18.
(1997). Salutogenese: zur Entmystifizierung der Gesundheit. Deutsche, erweiterte Ausgabe von A. Franke. Tübingen: dgvt.
(1988). Family sense of coherence and family adaptation. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 79 – 92.
(2011). IBM SPSS Amos 20 user’s guide. Chicago: IBM Software Group.
(1997). Situational sense of coherence: Development and measurement of the construct. In B. M. Artinian & M. M. Conger (Eds.), The Intersystem Model: Integrating theory and practice. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
(2001). Validation of the Insomnia Severity Index as an outcome measure for insomnia research. Sleep Medicine, 3, 297 – 307.
(2007). Development, implementation and dissemination of occupational health management (OHM): Putting salutogenesis into practice. In , Occupational health psychology. European perspectives on research, education and practice (Vol. 2). Castelo da Maia: ISMAI.
(1998). Was erhält Menschen gesund? Antonovskys Modell der Salutogenese–Diskussionsstand und Stellenwert. Köln: BZgA.
(1998). Sense of school coherence, perceptions of danger at school, and teacher support among youth at risk of school failure. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 15(4), 276 – 286.
(in Vorbereitung). Developing an expanded job demands-resources model predicting negative and positive health.
(2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386 – 400.
(2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 499 – 512.
(2011). Kohärenzerleben im Arbeitskontext–Ein nützliches Konstrukt für die ABO-Psychologie? Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 55, 115 – 131.
(2007). Unravelling the mystery of salutogenesis. The evidence base of the salutogenic research as measured by Antonovskys Sense of Coherence scale (Doctoral thesis). Äbo Akademi University Vasa, Faculty of Social and Caring Science, Department of Social Policy. Folkhälsan Research Centre. Health Promotion Research Programme, Research Report 2007: 1. Turku: Folkhälsan
(2005). Validity of Antonovskys sense of coherence scale: A systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 59, 460 – 466.
(2006). Antonovskys sense of coherence scale and the relation with health: A systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 60, 376 – 381.
(2005). Gesundheitspsychologie. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
(1997). The role of sense of coherence in well-being at work: Analyses of main and moderator effects. Work and Stress, 11, 134 – 147.
(2000). A mediational model of sense of coherence in the work context: A one-year follow-up study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 461 – 476.
(1997). Zum Stand der konzeptionellen und empirischen Entwicklung des Salutogenesekonzepts. In A. Antonovsky, Salutogenese: Zur Entmystifizierung der Gesundheit (dt., erw. Ausgabe, hrsg. von A. Franke). Tübingen: dgvt.
(1989). Gütekriterien zur Operationalisierung von sozialer Unterstützung am Arbeitsplatz. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaften, 43, 112 – 121.
(2004). KMU-vital, Programm für gesunde Betriebe. Zugriff am: 10. 11. 14. Verfügbar unter: www.kmu-vital.ch, www.pme-vital.ch
(2003). Hochschule und Gesundheit: Salutogenese am Arbeitsplatz Universität. Lengerich: Pabst.
(2004). The impact of sense of coherence and negative affectivity on the work stressor–strain relationship. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 9(3), 195 – 205.
(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit-indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling, 6(1), 1 – 55.
, Liechti, S. & Semmer, N. K. (November, 2008). Appreciation at work: Measurement and associations with well-being. Poster presented at the 8th Conference of the European Academy of Occupational Health Psychology: Valencia, Spain.
(2014). Process and outcome evaluation of an organizational-level stress management intervention in Switzerland. Health Promotion International. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dat091
(2003). Staying well or burning out at work: Work characteristics and personal resources as long-term predictors. Work & Stress, 17(2), 109 – 122.
(2008). Work stressors, health and sense of coherence in UK academic employees. Educational Psychology, 28, 823 – 835.
(2002). Neighborhood effects on sense of school coherence and educational behavior in students at risk of school failure. Children and Schools, 24, 73 – 89.
(1974). The psychological sense of community. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
(2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701 – 716.
(2000). Die Sense of Coherence Scale von Antonovsky. Teststatistische Überprüfung in einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsstichprobe und Konstruktion einer Kurzskala. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 50, 472 – 482.
(1995). Assessing stress at work: A framework and an instrument. In , Work and health: Scientific basis of progress in the working environment (pp. 105 – 113). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
(1999). SAA und SALSA: Zwei Fragebogen zur subjektiven Arbeitsanalyse. In , Handbuch psychologischer Arbeitsanalyseverfahren. Ein praxisorientierter Überblick (S. 397 – 419). Zürich: vdf Hochschulverlag.
(2000). Das Kohärenzgefühl: Gesundheitsressource oder Gesundheit selbst? Strukturelle und funktionale Aspekte von SOC und ein Validierungsversuch. In , Salutogenese und Kohärenzgefühl. Grundlagen, Empirie und Praxis eines gesundheitswissenschaftlichen Konzepts (S. 129 – 147). Weinheim: Juventa.
(2013). Comprehensibility, manageability and meaningfulness at work – construct validity of a scale measuring work-related sense of coherence. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 39(1), 1 – 8.
(1990). The measurement of well-being and other aspects of mental health. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(3), 193 – 210.