Pornographiekonsum in der Partnerschaft
Häufigkeit, Motivation und Einstellung des Konsums und deren Geschlechtsunterschiede
Abstract
Zusammenfassung.Theoretischer Hintergrund: Um die Einflüsse des Pornographiekonsums auf die Partnerschaft zu verstehen, werden Daten zum Erleben des eigenen und partnerschaftlichen Konsums benötigt. Fragestellung: Diese Studie soll einen Überblick über Häufigkeit, Einstellung, Motivation und Konsequenzen des Pornographiekonsums bei heterosexuellen Paaren geben. Methode: In der Schweiz lebende 18- bis 60-jährige Männer und Frauen in einer mindestens einjährigen Beziehung (N = 1’091) wurden anhand eines anonymen Online-Fragebogens befragt. Ergebnisse: Frauen konsumieren aufgrund geringeren Bedürfnisses weniger und seltener allein Pornographie als Männer. Männer konsumieren eher zum Spannungsabbau, aus Unzufriedenheit mit der gemeinsamen Sexualität, eher heimlich, mit schlechtem Gewissen und zum Missfallen ihrer Frauen. Frauen konsumieren mit gutem Gefühl und von ihren Männern befürwortet. Schlussfolgerungen: Geschlechtsunterschiede beim Pornographiekonsum in der Partnerschaft geben für ein gewisses Konfliktpotential Anlass. Bei entsprechender Beratung und positiverer Einstellung kann der Konsum durchaus positive Wirkung auf die gemeinsame Sexualität haben.
Abstract.Background: To understand the effects of pornography consumption on relationships, we need data regarding the experience of both own and common consumption. Objective: The present study provides an overview of the frequency, attitude, motivation, and consequences of pornography consumption among heterosexual couples. Methods: Men and women who lived in Switzerland, were between 18 and 65 years old, and were in a relationship of at least 1 year (N = 1,091) filled out an anonymous online survey. Results: Women consume less pornography than men, mainly because of a lack of interest. Men consume to relieve stress and because of relationship dissatisfaction, largely in secret, with guilty feelings and to the displeasure of their partner. Women consume with good feelings and the support of their partners. Conclusions: Gender differences in the consumption of pornography may lead to relationship conflicts. After coaching to instill fewer negative attitudes, consumption can have positive effects on the shared sexuality.
Literatur
2017). Does exposure to erotica reduce attraction and love for romantic partners in men? Independent replications of Kenrick, Gutierres, and Goldberg (1989) study 2. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70(C), 191 – 197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.11.003
(2017). Nervensache – praxisorientierte Neurophysiologie der weiblichen Sexualität. Praxis, 104 (13), 695 – 700.
(2001). Sexuality, gender, and the couple: A sociohistorical perspective. Annual Review of Sex Research, 12(1), 1 – 32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10532528.2001.10559792
(2014). Desire and dilemma – gender differences in German students’ consumption of pornography. Porn Studies, 2 (1), 76 – 92. https://doi.org/10.1080/23268743.2014.984923
(2011). Sexual media use and relational satisfaction in heterosexual couples. Personal Relationships, 18, 562 – 585. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01328.x
(2003). Romantic partners’ use of pornography: Its significance for women. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 29 (1), 1 – 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02908761
(2005). Demographic characteristics of persons using pornography in three technological contexts. Sexuality & Culture, 9(1), 28 – 48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02908761
(2005). Adolescents’ experience with sex on the web: results from online focus groups. Journal of Adolescence, 28 (4), 535 – 540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.10.006
(2017). The use and effects of pornography in romantic relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 6 – 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.03.004
(2000). Gender and reactions to a hypothetical relationship partner’s masturbation and use of sexually explicit media. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 133 – 141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490009552030
(2004). Sex on the internet: Furthering our understanding of men with online sexual problems. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18 (3), 223 – 230. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-164X.18.3.223
(2009). Use of pornography in a random sample of Norwegian heterosexual couples. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38 (5), 746 – 753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9314-4
(2008). Sexualität im Internet. Ein aktueller Forschungsüberblick. Zeitschrift für Sexualforschung, 21 (4), 291 – 318. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1098728
(2011). Perceived consequences of casual online sexual activities on heterosexual relationships: A U.S. online survey. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40 (2), 429 – 439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9598-z
(2019). Internet pornography use and sexual motivation: A systematic review and integration. Annals of the International Communication Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2019.1584045
(2013). Pornography, relationship alternatives, and intimate extradyadic behavior. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4 (6), 699 – 704. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613480821
(2006). Gender differences in pornography consumption among young heterosexual Danish adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35 (5), 577 – 585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9064-0
(2008). Self-perceived effects of pornography consumption. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37 (4), 614 – 625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9212-1
(2007). Pornography consumption: A study of prevalence rates, consumption patterns, and effects. Psykologisk Ph. D.-skriftserie, ISSN1600 – 8006.
(2017). Perceived effects of pornography on the couple relationship: Initial findings of open-ended, participant-informed, „bottom-up“ research. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46 (2), 585 – 602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0783-6
(2012). A love that doesn’t last: Pornography consumption and weakened commitment to one’s romantic part. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 31 (4), 410 – 438. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2012.31.4.410
(2015). Is pornography use associated with sexual difficulties and dysfunctions among younger heterosexual men? The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12 (5), 1136 – 1139. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12853
(2002). The social organization of women’s sexuality, In: Wingood, G. M. and DiClemente, R. J., Eds., Handbook of women’s sexual and reproductive health, Springer Science & Business Media, New York, 43 – 70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0689-8_4
(2009). Viewing sexually-explicit materials alone or together: Associations with relationship quality. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40 (2), 441 – 448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-009-9585-4
(2014). Pornography and sexual experiences among high school students in Sweden. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 35 (3), 179 – 188. https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000034
(2016). Pornography and couples: What does the research tell us? Contemporary Family Therapy, 38 (4), 412 – 423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-016-9396-4
(2000). The impact of anonymity on responses to sensitive questions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30 (8), 1691 – 1708. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02462.x
(2004). How are sociosexuality, sex drive, and lifetime number of sexual partners related? Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1255 – 1266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264754
(1980). Sexuality in a 70-year-old urban population. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 24 (6), 335 – 342. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3999(80)90025-2
(2013). Pornography use: Who uses it and how it is associated with Couple Outcomes. Journal of Sex Research, 50 (1), 72 – 83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.648027
(2015). How much more xxx is generation x consuming? Evidence of changing attitudes and behaviors related to pornography since 1973. Journal of Sex Research, 53 (1), 12 – 20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2014.1003773
(2007). Sex differences in viewing sexual stimuli: An eye-tracking study in men and women. Hormones and Behavior, 1, 4, 524 – 533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.01.008
(2012). A review of internet pornography use research: Methodology and content from the past 10 years. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15 (1), 13 – 23. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0477
(2012). Erotica viewing effects on intimate relationships and self/partner evaluations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42 (4), 615 – 624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-0034-4
(2012). Functional neuroimaging studies of sexual arousal and orgasm in healthy men and women: a review and meta-analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioural Reviews, 36 (6), 1481 – 1509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.03.006
(2014). Korean men’s pornography use, their interest in extreme pornography, and dyadic sexual relationships. International Journal of Sexual Health, 27 (1), 16 – 35. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2014.927048
(2006). Use of Pornography in traditional Media and on the Internet in Norway. Journal of Sex Research, 43 (3), 245 – 254. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490609552323
(2009). Sex differences in visual attention to sexually explicit videos: A preliminary study. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 6 (4), 1011 – 1017. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.01031.x
(2011). Mental- and physical-health indicators and sexually explicit media use behavior by adults. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 8 (3), 764 – 772. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02030.x
(2013). Gender commonalities and differences in the neural processing of visual sexual stimuli. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 10, 1328 – 1342. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12096
(2015). Differences in pornography use among couples: Associations with satisfaction, stability, and relationship processes. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45 (1), 145 – 158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0562-9
(2012). A longitudinal analysis of US adults’ pornography exposure. Journal of Media Psychology, 24 (2), 67 – 76. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000063
(2010). Exploring actor and partner correlates of sexual satisfaction among married couples. Social Science Research, 39 (5), 725 – 738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.09.002
(