Genetic and Environmental Influences on Temperament
The Polish-German Twin Study, Based on Self-Report and Peer-Rating
Abstract
Among the criteria for a personality paradigm the following three are the most crucial: biological basis (e. g., genetic contribution to the phenotypic variance), universality (existence of traits in different cultures) and reality (possibility to measure traits by different methods). The present study combines all three criteria to explore the impact of genetic and environmental factors on temperamental traits, as stipulated byStrelau's regulative theory of temperament, across two culturally different samples (Polish and German), and by means of two diagnostic methods (self-report and peer-rating). The analysis was conducted on data obtained from 1009 same-sex pairs of twins (German sample) and 546 same-sex pairs of twins (Polish sample). For each subject the self-report as well as rating from two independent peers was recorded by both the Polish and German versions of the Formal Characteristics of Behavior-Temperament Inventory. Results demonstrate substantial heritability of temperamental traits, although average peer-rating tends to provide lower heritability estimates than self-report (for six traits M = 33% and M = 46% of the total variance, respectively). After separating the error variance from the effect of nonshared environment for both methods (self-report and peer-rating) and both samples, joint analysis indicated a very high impact of genetic factors (the average raised up to 66% of the total variance). No significant “sample” effect was found, so that we may allows to conclude that temperamental traits are determined in both cultures to the same extent by genetic factors.
References
1991). What can we learn from the discussion of personality questionnaires for the construction of temperament inventories?. In J. Strelau & A. Angleitner (Eds.), Explorations in temperament: International perspectives on theory and measurement (pp. 191-201). New York: Plenum.
(1995, July). The Bielefeld-Warsaw Twin Project: First report on the Bielefeld samples . Workshop on Genetic Studies on Temperament and Personality, Pu∤tusk, Poland.
(1934). Patterns of culture . Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
(1989). Imposed etics-emics-derived etics: The operationalization of a compelling idea. International Journal of Psychology , 24, 721– 735.
(1984). Temperament: Early developing personality traits . Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1982). Aggregation, moderator variables, and the validity of personality tests: A peer-rating study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 43, 1254– 1269.
(1988). Trait psychology and the revival of personality and culture studies . 106th Convention of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, USA.
(1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences , 13, 653– 665.
(2000). The Formal Characteristics of Behavior-Temperament Inventory (FCB-TI): Preliminary results of the Italian version. Personality and Individual Differences , 28, 287– 298.
(1991). Dimensions of personality: 16, 5 or 3? Criteria for a taxonomic paradigm. Personality and Individual Differences , 12, 773– 790.
(2000). Rocznik Statystyki Międzynarodowej 2000 [International statistical yearbook 2000]. Warszawa: Author.
(1992). Evidence for genetic influences on personality from self-reports and informant ratings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 1, 85– 96.
(1976). Nationality and organizational stress . Brussels: European Institute for Research in Management.
(1994). Who should own the definition of personality?. European Journal of Personality , 8, 149– 162.
(1996). Heritability of the Big Five personality dimensions and their facets: A twin study. Journal of Personality , 64, 577– 591.
(1998). Heritability of facet-level traits in cross-cultural twin sample: Support for a hierarchical model of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 74, 1– 9.
(1987). Rozwój ontogenetyczny a formowanie się gatunku homo sapiens jako funkcja zmian przystosowawczych do środowiska [Ontogenetic development and formation of the species homo sapiens as a function of adaptational changes to the environment]. In N. Wolański (Ed.), Czynniki rozwoju cz∤owieka. Wstęp do ekologii cz∤owieka [Factors of human development. Introduction to human ecology] (3rd ed., pp. 13-80). Warszawa: PWN.
(1993). LISREL 8. User's reference guide . Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc..
(1945). The psychological frontiers of society . New York: Columbia University Press.
(1980). Personality and the eye of the beholder: Crossing some traditional philosophical boundaries in the search for consistency in all of the people. Psychological Review , 87, 88– 104.
(1953). Personality formation: The determinants. In C. Kluchhohn, H.A. Murray, & D.M. Schneider (Eds.), Personality in nature, society and culture (2nd ed., pp. 53-67). New York: Knopf.
(1945). The cultural background of personality . New York: Appleton.
(1992). Genes and environment in personality development . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
(1981). Cross-cultural differences in neuroticism, extraversion and psychoticism. In R. Lynn (Ed.), Dimensions of personality. Papers in honour of H.J. Eysenck (pp. 263-286). Oxford: Pergamon.
(1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 54, 853– 863.
(1992). Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families . Dordrecht: Kluwer.
(1997). Genetyczne podstawy temperamentu [Genetic foundations of temperament]. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza Wydzia∤u Psychologii Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
(1996). Diagnoza zygotyczności bliźniąt na podstawie Kwestionariusza Fizycznego Podobieństwa Bliźniąt [Diagnosis of twin zygosity on the basis of the Questionnaire of Twins Physical Resemblance]. Przegląd Psychologiczny , 39, 161– 160.
(1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach . Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1997a). Genetic and environmental influences on personality: A twin study of twins reared together using the self- and peer-report NEO-FFI scales. Journal of Personality , 65, 449– 475.
(1997b, July). Are peer reports better measures of personality than self-reports? Arguments based on a twin study of NEO-FI scales . VIIIth Biennial Meeting of the International Society for the Study of Individual Differences, Aarhus, Denmark.
(1983). Behavioral development and construct validity: The principle of aggregation. Psychological Bulletin , 94, 18– 38.
(1993). The location of the regulative theory of temperament (RTT) among other temperament theories. In J. Hettema & I.J. Deary (Eds.), Foundations of personality (pp. 113-132). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
(1998). Temperament: A psychological perspective . New York: Plenum.
(1999). Pavlovian Temperament Survey (PTS). An international handbook . Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber.
(1995). Temperamental traits postulated by RTT viewed from a behavior-genetic perspective: Self report twin data. Polish Psychological Bulletin , 26, 283– 295.
(1993). The Formal Characteristics of Behavior-Temperament Inventory (FCB-TI): Theoretical assumptions and scale construction. European Journal of Personality , 7, 313– 336.
(1995). The Formal Characteristics of Behavior-Temperament Inventory (FCB-TI): Validity studies. European Journal of Personality , 9, 207– 229.
(2000). World development indicators 2000 . Washington: Author.
(2000). Human development report 2000 . New York: Oxford University Press.
UNDP (1996). Translating tests: Some practical guidelines. European Psychologist , 1, 89– 99.
(2000). Evidence for genetic influence on the “Big Five” personality dimensions: Self-report and peer-rating twin study. Polish Psychological Bulletin , 31, 29– 54.
(1997). Formalna Charakterystyka Zachowania—Kwestionariusz Temperamentu (FCZ-KT). Podr ęcznik. [Formal Characteristics of Behavior-Temperament Inventory (FCB-TI). Handbook]. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych PTP.
(