Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article

The Bidimensionality of Grit

Conceptual Dissociation or Methodological Artifact?

Published Online:May 09, 2023https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000766

Abstract

Abstract: Grit, defined as passion and perseverance for long-term goals, has received much attention over the last decade. However, its dimensionality is still very much up for debate. The present study examines whether the bidimensional structure of the construct is a statistical artifact caused by item reversal. The sample consisted of 1,115 participants (Myears = 38.92; SD = 15.08), of whom 67.3% were women. Several confirmatory models were specified with different versions of two grit scales. A bifactor model with a grit-general factor and two method-specific factors (one direct items, the other reversed items) demonstrated better fit according to all indicators (Original Grit-S: CFI = .995, RMSEA = .024; Mixed Grit-S: CFI = .966, RMSEA = .068; Mixed EGO: CFI = .985, RMSEA = .051) than a bifactor model with a grit-general factor and two theoretical factors (perseverance of effort and consistency of interests, Original Grit-S: CFI = .933, RMSEA = .085; Mixed Grit-S: CFI = .944, RMSEA = .088; Mixed EGO: CFI = .982, RMSEA = .056). Grit is a unidimensional construct, and the two dimensions identified in previous studies (consistency of interests and perseverance of effort) were the result of a statistical artifact due to item reversal. In addition, redirecting the items modified the factor structure of the Grit-S scale. The practical implications of the study are discussed.

References

  • Akos, P., & Kretchmar, J. (2017). Investigating grit at a non-cognitive predictor of college success. The Review of Higher Education, 40(2), 163–186. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2017.0000 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Arco-Tirado, J. L., Fernández-Martín, F. D., & Hoyle, R. H. (2018). Development and validation of a Spanish version of the Grit-S scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 96. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00096 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Areepattamannil, S., & Khine, M. S. (2018). Evaluating the psychometric properties of the original Grit Scale using Rasch Analysis in an Arab adolescent sample. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 36(8), 856–862. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282917719976 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046016 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Carlson, M., Wilcox, R., Chou, C.-P., Chang, M., Yang, F., Blanchard, J., Marterella, A., Kuo, A., & Clark, F. (2011). Psychometric properties of reverse-scored items on the CES-D in a sample of ethnically diverse older adults. Psychological Assessment, 23(2), 558–562. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022484 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chiavaroli, N. (2017). Negatively-worded multiple choice questions: An avoidable threat to validity. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 22(3), 1–14. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Clark, K. N., & Malecki, C. K. (2019). Academic Grit Scale: Psychometric properties and associations with achievement and life satisfaction. Journal of School Psychology, 72, 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.12.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Credé, M. (2018). What shall we do about grit? A critical review of what we know and what we don’t know. Educational Researcher, 47(9), 606–611. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X18801322 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Credé, M. (2019). Total grit scale score does not represent perseverance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(10), 39–41. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1816934116 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Credé, M., Tynan, M. C., & Harms, P. D. (2017). Much ado about grit: A meta-analytic synthesis of the grit literature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(3), 492–511. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000102 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • DiStefano, C., & Motl, R. W. (2009). Personality correlates of method effects due to negatively worded items on the Rosenberg Self-Esteem scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(3), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.10.020 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Personality Processes and Individual Differences, 92(6), 1087–1101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Duckworth, A. L., & Quinn, P. D. (2009). Development and validation of the Short Grit Scale (GRIT-S). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(2), 166–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802634290 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Duckworth, A. L., Quinn, P. D., & Tsukayama, E. (2021). Revisiting the factor structure of grit: A commentary on Duckworth and Quinn (2009). Journal of Personality Assessment, 103(5), 573–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2021.1942022 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Duckworth, A. L., Taxer, J. L., Eskreis-Winkler, L., Galla, B. M., & Gross, J. J. (2019). Self-control and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 373–399. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103230 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ferrando, P. J. (2021). Seven decades of factor analysis: From Yela to the present day. Psicothema, 33(3), 378–385. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2021.24 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fong, C. J., & Kim, Y. W. (2021). A clash of constructs? Re-examining grit in light of academic buoyancy and future time perspective. Current Psychology, 40, 1824–1837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-0120-4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gonzalez, O., Canning, J. R., Smyth, H., & Mackinnon, D. P. (2020). A psychometric evaluation of the Short Grit Scale: A closer look at its factor structure and scale functioning. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 36(4), 646–657. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000535 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Guo, J., Tang, X., & Xu, K. M. (2019). Capturing the multiplicative effect of perseverance and passion: Measurement issues of combining two grit facets. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(10), 3938–3940. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1820125116 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hasan, E. H. A., Munawar, K., & Khaiyom, H. J. A. (2022). Psychometric properties of developed and transadapted grit measures across cultures: A systematic review. Current Psychology, 41, 6894–6912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01137-w First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hernández-Dorado, A., Vigil-Colet, A., Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2021). Is correcting for acquiescence increasing the external validity of personality test scores? Psicothema, 33(4), 639–646. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2021.131 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Herzberg, P. Y., Glaesmer, H., & Hoyer, J. (2006). Separating optimism and pessimism: A robust psychometric analysis of the Revised Life Orientation Test (LOT-R). Psychological Assessment, 18(4), 433–438. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.18.4.433 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Horan, P. M., DiStefano, C., & Motl, R. W. (2003). Wording effects in self-esteem scales: Methodological artifact or response style? Structural Equation Modeling, 10(3), 435–455. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM1003_6 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Irwing, P. (Ed.). (2018). The Wiley handbook of psychometric testing: A multidisciplinary reference on survey, scale and test development. Wiley. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jachimowicz, J. M., Wihler, A., Bailey, E. R., & Galinsky, A. D. (2019). Reply to Guo et al. and Credé: Grit-S scale measures only perseverance, not passion, and its supposed subfactors are merely artifactors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(10), 3942–3944. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821668116 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Józsa, K., & Morgan, G. A. (2017). Reversed items in likert scales: Filtering out invalid responders. Journal of Psychological and Educational Research, 25(1), 7–25. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kam, C. C., Meyer, J. P., & Sun, S. (2021). Why do people agree with both regular and reversed items? A logical response perspective. Assessment, 28(4), 1110–1124. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911211001931 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Karaman, M. A., Vela, J. C., Aguilar, A. A., Saldana, K., & Montenegro, M. C. (2019). Psychometric properties of US-Spanish versions of the grit and resilience scales with a Latinx population. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 41(1), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-018-9350-2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Li, J., Zhao, Y., Kong, F., Du, S., Yang, S., & Wang, S. (2016). Psychometric assessment of the Short Grit Scale among Chinese adolescents. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 36(3), 291–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282916674858 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. (1986). Negative item bias in ratings scales for preadolescent children: A cognitive-developmental phenomenon. Developmental Psychology, 22(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.22.1.37 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mooradian, T., Matzler, K., Uzelac, B., & Bauer, F. (2016). Perspiration and inspiration: Grit and innovativeness as antecedents of entrepreneurial success. Journal of Economic Psychology, 56, 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2016.08.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Moore, R. C., Hussain, M. A., Watson, C. W. M., Fazeli, P. L., Marquine, M. J., Yarns, B. C., Jeste, D. V., & Moore, D. J. (2018). Grit and ambition are associated with better neurocognitive and everyday functioning among adults living with HIV. AIDS and Behavior, 22(10), 3214–3225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-018-2061-1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Morell, M., Yang, J. S., Gladstone, J. R., Faust, L. T., Ponnock, A. R., & Wigfield, A. (2021). Grit: The long and short of it. Journal of Educational Psychology, 133(5), 1038–1058. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000594 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mueller, B. A., Wolfe, M. T., & Syed, I. (2017). Passion and grit: An exploration of the pathways leading to venture success. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(3), 260–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.02.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Muenks, K., Wigfield, A., Yang, J. S., & Neal, C. R. (2017). How true is grit? Assessing its relations to High School and College students’ personality characteristics, self-regulation, engagement, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(5), 599–620. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000153 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Muñiz, J., & Fonseca-Pedrero, E. (2019). Ten steps for test development. Psicothema, 31(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.291 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Navarro-González, D., Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Vigil-Colet, A. (2016). How response bias affects the factorial structure of personality self-reports. Psicothema, 28(4), 465–470. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.113 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nishikawa, K., Okugami, S., & Amemiya, T. (2015). Development of the Japanese Grit Scale (Grit-S). Japanase Journal Personality, 24, 167–169. https://doi.org/10.2132/personality.24.167 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Paulhus, D. L., & Vazire, S. (2005). The self-report method. In R. W. RobinsR. C. FraleyEds., Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 224–239). Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ponnock, A. R., Muenks, K. M., Morell, M., Yang, J. S., Gladstone, J. R., & Wigfield, A. (2020). Grit and conscientiousness: Another jangle fallacy. Journal of Research in Personality, 89, Article 104021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.104021 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Postigo, Á., Cuesta, M., Fernández-Alonso, R., García-Cueto, E., & Muñiz, J. (2021a). Academic grit modulates school performance evolution over time: A latent transition analysis. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 26(2), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicoe.2021.03.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Postigo, Á., Cuesta, M., Fernández-Alonso, R., García-Cueto, E., & Muñiz, J. (2021b). Temporal stability of grit and school performance in adolescents: A longitudinal perspective. Psicología Educativa, 27(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.5093/psed2021a4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Postigo, Á., Cuesta, M., & García-Cueto, E. (2021). Entrepreneurial personality, conscientiousness, self-control, and grit: The psychological side of self-employment. Anales de Psicología, 37(2), 361–370. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.453711 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Postigo, Á., Cuesta, M., García-Cueto, E., González-Nuevo, C., & Muñiz, J. (2021). Grit assessment: Is one dimension enough? Journal of Personality Assessment, 103(6), 786–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2020.1848853 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Postigo, Á., García-Fernández, J., Cuesta, C., González-Nuevo, C., Menéndez-Aller, Á., & García-Cueto, E. (2023). The bidimensionality of grit: Conceptual dissociation or methodological artifact? https://osf.io/t92ds/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rodriguez, M., Boyer, S., Fleming, D., & Cohen, S. (2019). Managing the next generation of sales, gen Z/millennial cusp: An exploration of grit, entrepreneurship, and loyalty. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 26(01), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051712X.2019.1565136 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Roth, M., Decker, O., Herzberg, P. Y., & Brähler, E. (2008). Dimensionality and norms of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in a German general population sample. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24, 190–197. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.24.3.190 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Schmidt, F. T. C., Fleckenstein, J., Retelsdorf, J., Eskreis-winkler, L., & Möller, J. (2019). Measuring grit: A German validation and a domain-specific approach to grit. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35(3), 436–447. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000407 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Schmidt, F. T. C., Lechner, C. M., & Danner, D. (2020). New wine in an old bottle? A facet-level perspective on the added value of Grit over BFI – 2 Conscientiousness. PLoS One, 15(2), Article e0228969. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228969 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schmidt, F. T. C., Nagy, G., Fleckenstein, J., Möller, J., & Retelsdorf, J. A. N. (2018). Same same, but different? Relations between facets of conscientiousness and grit. European Journal of Personality, 720(32), 705–720. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2171 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schmidt, F. T. C., Sudzina, F., & Botek, M. (2020). Psychometric assessment of the Short Grit Scale among Czech young adults. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282920974817 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Solís-Salazar, M. (2015). The dilemma of combining positive and negative items in scales. Psicothema, 27(2), 192–199. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2014.266 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Steinmayr, R., Weidinger, A. F., & Wigfield, A. (2018). Does students’ Grit predict their school achievement above and beyond their personality, motivation, and engagement? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 53, 106–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.02.004 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Suárez-Álvarez, J., Pedrosa, I., Lozano, L. M., García-Cueto, E., Cuesta, M., & Muñiz, J. (2018). Using reversed items in Likert scales: A questionable practice. Psicothema, 30(2), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.33 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tang, X., Wang, M., Parada, F., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2021). Putting the goal back into grit: Academic goal commitment, grit, and academic achievement. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 50(3), 470–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01348-1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • van Sonderen, E., Sanderman, R., & Coyne, J. C. (2013). Ineffectiveness of reverse wording of questionnaire items: Let’s learn from cows in the rain. PLoS One, 8(7), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068967 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Vazsonyi, A. T., Ksinan, A. J., Jiskrova, G. K., Mikuška, J., Javakhishvili, M., & Cui, G. (2019). To grit or not to grit, that is the question!. Journal of Research in Personality, 78, 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2018.12.006 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vigil-Colet, A., Navarro-González, D., & Morales-Vives, F. (2020). To reverse or to not reverse Likert-type items: That is the question. Psicothema, 32(1), 108–114. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2019.286 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wong, N., Rindfleisch, A., & Burroughs, J. E. (2003). Do reverse-worded items confound measures in cross-cultural consumer research? The case of the material values scale. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(1), 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1086/374697 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar