Skip to main content
Original Articles and Reviews

Three Paradoxical Effects on Academic Self-Concept Across Countries, Schools, and Students

Frame-of-Reference as a Unifying Theoretical Explanation

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000332

Abstract. We simultaneously resolve three paradoxes in academic self-concept research with a single unifying meta-theoretical model based on frame-of-reference effects across 68 countries, 18,292 schools, and 485,490 15-year-old students. Paradoxically, but consistent with predictions, effects on math self-concepts were negative for:

  • being from countries where country-average achievement was high; explaining the paradoxical cross-cultural self-concept effect;
  • attending schools where school-average achievement was high; demonstrating big-fish-little-pond-effects (BFLPE) that generalized over 68 countries, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)/non-OECD countries, high/low achieving schools, and high/low achieving students;
  • year-in-school relative to age; unifying different research literatures for associated negative effects for starting school at a younger age and acceleration/skipping grades, and positive effects for starting school at an older age (“academic red shirting”) and, paradoxically, even for repeating a grade.

Contextual effects matter, resulting in significant and meaningful effects on self-beliefs, not only at the student (year in school) and local school level (BFLPE), but remarkably even at the macro-contextual country-level. Finally, we juxtapose cross-cultural generalizability based on Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) data used here with generalizability based on meta-analyses, arguing that although the two approaches are similar in many ways, the generalizability shown here is stronger in terms of support for the universality of the frame-of-reference effects.

References

  • Allen, C., Chen, Q., Wilson, V., & Hughes, J. N. (2009). Quality of research design moderates effects of grade retention on achievement: A meta-analytic, multi-level analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31, 480–499. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373709352239 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 164–180. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Coleman, J. M., & Fults, B. A. (1985). Special class placement, level of intelligence, and the self-concepts of gifted children: A social comparison perspective. Remedial and Special Education, 6, 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258500600103 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eccles, J. S. (2009). Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educational Psychologist, 44, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520902832368 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Elliot, A. J., & Dweck, C. S. (2005). Competence and motivation: Competence as the core of achievement motivation. In A. J. ElliotC. S. DweckEds., Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 3–12). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fantuzzo, J. W., McDermott, P. A., Manz, P. H., Hampton, V. R., & Burdick, N. A. (1996). The pictorial scale of perceived competence and social acceptance: Does it work with low-income urban children? Child Development, 67, 1071–1084. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gladwell, M. (2008). Outliers. New York, NY: Little, Brown and Company. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Greenwald, A. G. (1988). A social-cognitive account of the self’s development. In D. K. LapsleyF. C. PowerEds., Self, ego and identity: Interpretative approaches (pp. 30–42). New York, NY: Springer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Guo, J., Parker, P. D., Marsh, H. W., & Morin, A. J. S. (2015). Achievement, motivation, and educational choices: A longitudinal study of expectancy and value using a multiplicative perspective. Developmental Psychology, 51, 1163–1176. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039440 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hattie, J. A. (2012). Visible learning: A synthesis of 800 + meta-analyses on achievement. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • James, W. (1890/1963). The principles of psychology (Vol. 2, New York, NY: Holt. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kagan, S. L., Moore, E., & Bredekamp, S. (1995). Considering children’s early development and learning: Toward common views and vocabulary (Report N. 95–03). Washington, DC: National Education Goals Pane First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. (1984). Self-concept: The application of a frame of reference model to explain paradoxical results. Australian Journal of Education, 28, 165–181. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. (1987). The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 280–295. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. (2016). Cross-cultural generalizability of year in school effects: Negative effects of acceleration and positive effects of retention on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000059 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Abduljabbar, A. S., Parker, P. D., Morin, A. J., Abdelfattah, F., & Nagengast, B. (2014). The big-fish-little-pond effect in mathematics: A cross-cultural comparison of US and Saudi Arabian TIMSS responses. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45, 777–804. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022113519858 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Abduljabbar, A. S., Parker, P. D., Morin, A. J., Abdelfattah, F., Nagengast, B., & Abu-Hilal, M. A. (2015). The big-fish-little-pond effect: Generalizability of social comparison processes over two age cohorts from Western, Asian, and Middle Eastern Islamic countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 258–271. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., Daniel, H.-D., & O’Mara, A. (2009). Gender effects in the peer reviews of grant proposals: A comprehensive meta-analysis comparing traditional and multilevel approaches. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1290–1326. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (2006). Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective: Beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 133–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00010.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K. (2003). Big-fish-little-pond-effect on academic self-concept. A cross-cultural (26 country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools. The American Psychologist, 58, 364–376. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2001). Reunification of East and West German school systems: Longitudinal multilevel modeling study of the big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 321 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Kuyper, H., Morin, A. J. S., Parker, P. D., & Seaton, M. (2014). Big-fish-little-pond social comparison and local dominance effects: Integrating new statistical models, methodology, design, theory and substantive implications. Learning and Instruction, 33, 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.04.0020959-4752/ First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., & O’Mara, A. (2008). Reciprocal effects between academic self-concept, self-esteem, achievement, and attainment over seven adolescent years: Unidimensional and multidimensional perspectives of self-concept. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 542–552. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207312313 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Parada, R. H., Craven, R. G., & Finger, L. (2004). In the looking glass: A reciprocal effect model elucidating the complex nature of bullying, psychological determinants, and the central role of self-concept. In C. E. SandersG. D. PhyeEds., Bullying: Implications for the classroom (pp. 63–109). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., & Parker, J. W. (1984). Determinants of student self-concept: Is it better to be a relatively large fish in a small pond even if you don’t learn to swim as well? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 213–231. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Pekrun, R., Murayama, K., Guo, J., Dicke, T., & Lichtenfeld, S. (2016). Long-term positive effects of repeating a year in school: Six-year longitudinal study of self-beliefs, anxiety, social relations, school grades, and test scores. Journal of Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000144 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., & Seaton, M. (2015). The Big-fish-little-pond effect, competence self-perceptions, and relativity: Substantive advances and methodological innovation. In A. J. ElliottEd., Advances in Motivation Science (Vol. 2, pp. 127–184). New York, NY: Elsevier. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Seaton, M., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Hau, K. T., O’Mara, A. J., & Craven, R. G. (2008). The big-fish-little-pond-effect stands up to critical scrutiny: implications for theory, methodology, and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 319–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9075-6 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., & Yeung, A. S. (1997). Coursework selection: Relations to academic self-concept and achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 691–720. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Minkov, M. (2008). Self-enhancement and self-stability predict school achievement at the national level. Cross-Cultural Research, 42, 172–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397107312956 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nagengast, B., & Marsh, H. W. (2012). Big fish in little ponds aspire more: Mediation and cross-cultural generalizability of school-average ability effects on self-concept and career aspirations in science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 1033–1053. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027697 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Parker, P. D., Marsh, H. W., Ciarrochi, J., Marshall, S., & Abduljabbar, A. S. (2014). Juxtaposing math self-efficacy and self-concept as predictors of long-term achievement outcomes. Educational Psychology, 34, 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.797339 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Parker, P. D., Marsh, H. W., Guo, J., Anders, J., Shure, N., & Dicke, T. (2018). An Information Distortion Model of social class differences in math self-concept, intrinsic value and utility value. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110, 445–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000215 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Parker, P. D., Marsh, H. W., Thoemmes, F., & Biddle, N. (2018). The negative year in school effect: Extending scope and strengthening causal claims. Journal of Educational Psychology. Advance Online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/2Fedu0000270 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Parker, P. D., Van Zanden, B., & Parker, R. B. (2018). Girls get smart, boys get smug: Historical changes in gender differences math, English, and academic social comparison and achievement. Learning and Instruction, 54, 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.09.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Seaton, M., Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (2009). Earning its place as a pan-human theory: Universality of the big-fish-little-pond effect across 41 culturally diverse countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 403–419. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. The American Psychologist, 55, 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shen, C., & Tam, H. P. (2006). The paradoxical relationship between students’ achievement and their self-perceptions: A cross-national analysis based on three waves of TIMSS data. Proceedings of the IRC-2006, The 2nd IEA International Research Conference, 1, 43–60. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stevenson, H. W., Chen, C., & Lee, S. (1993). Motivation and achievement of gifted children in East Asia and the United States. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 223–250. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar