Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.27.1.47

A moderated consistency model is presented, which attempts to explain the consistency between explicit and implicit indicators as a function of awareness and adjustment. In a study on attitudes of Germans toward Turks, we tested the hypothesis that functionally equivalent person and situation moderators pertaining to awareness and adjustment show a synergistic interplay. Concerning moderators of adjustment, no effects on explicit-implicit consistency were obtained for situational variables nor for the interaction of personal and situational variables. However, concerning moderators of awareness, a reliable first-order effect was found for Private Self-Consciousness. Moreover, Private Self-Consciousness and experimentally manipulated motivation to introspect showed the assumed synergistic interaction moderator effect. The empirical findings are discussed with regard to the role of awareness of implicit attitudes and the potentially underlying mechanisms of implicit-explicit consistency.

References

  • Aiken, L.S., West, S.G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Asendorpf, J.B., Banse, R., Mücke, D. (2002). Double dissociation between implicit and explicit personality self-concept: The case of shy behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 380–393 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Banse, R., Gawronski, B. (2003). Die Skala Motivation zu vorurteilsfreiem Verhalten: Skaleneigenschaften und Validierung. [The scale motivation to act without prejudice. Psychometric properties and validities.] Diagnostika, 49, 4–13 First citation in articleAbstractGoogle Scholar

  • Banse, R., Seise, J., Zerbes, N. (2001). Implicit attitudes towards homosexuality: Reliability, validity, and controllability of the IAT. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 145–160 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, K.W., Ryan, R.M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822–848 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Busemeyer, J.R., Jones, L.E. (1983). Analysis of multiplicative combination rules when the causal variables are measured with error. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 549–562 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chaplin, W.F. (1991). The next generation of moderator research in personality psychology. Journal of Personality, 59, 143–178 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dovidio, J.F., Kawakami, K., Beach, K.R. (2001). Implicit and explicit attitudes: Examination of the relationship between measures of in-group bias. In R. Brown & S. Gaertner (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology, Vol. 4: Intergroup processes (pp. 175-197). Oxford: Blackwell First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dunton, B.C., Fazio, R.H. (1997). An individual difference measure of motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 316–326 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fazio, R.H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. XXIII, pp. 75-109). New York: Academic Press First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fazio, R.H., Olson, M.A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297–327 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M.F., Buss, A.H. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 522–527 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Filipp, S.-H., Freudenberg, E. Eds. (1989). Fragebogen zur Erfassung dispositionaler Selbstaufmerksamkeit (SAM). [Questionnaire for assessing dispositional self-consciousness]. Göttingen: Hogrefe First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gawronski, B. (2002). What does the Implicit Association Test measure? A test of the convergent and discriminant validity of prejudice related IATs. Experimental Psychology, 49, 171–180 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Gawronski, B., Hofmann, W., Wilbur, C.J. (in press). Are “implicit” attitudes unconscious?. Consciousness and Cognition, First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gibbons, F.X. (1983). Self-attention and self-report: The “veridicality” hypothesis. Journal of Personality, 51, 517–542 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Greenwald, A.G., Banaji, M.R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greenwald, A.G., McGhee, D.E., Schwartz, J.L.K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greenwald, A.G., Nosek, B.A., Banaji, M.R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test I: An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gschwendner, T., Hofmann, W., Schmitt, M. (2006). Moderatoren der Konsistenz implizit und explizit erfasster Einstellungen und Persönlichkeitsmerkmale. [Moderators of the consistency of implicitly and explicitly assessed attitudes and personality traits] Psychologische Rundschau, 57, 13–33 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Hixon, J.G., Swann, W.B. (1993). When does introspection bear fruit? Self-reflection, self-insight, and interpersonal choices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 35–43 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Gschwendner, T., Le, H., Schmitt, M. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1369–1385 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hofmann, W., Gschwendner, T., Schmitt, M. (2005). On implicit-explicit consistency: The moderating role of individual differences in awareness and adjustment. European Journal of Personality, 9, 25–49 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hofmann, W., Gschwendner, T., Nosek, B.A., Schmitt, M. (in press). What moderates implicit-explicit consistency?. European Review of Social Psychology, First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kenrick, D.T., Funder, D.C. (1988). Profiting from controversy: Lessons from the person-situation debate. American Psychologist, 43, 23–34 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nosek, B.A. (2005). Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 565–584 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nosek, B.A., Banaji, M.R. (2001). Privately expressed attitudes mediate the relationship between public and implicit attitudes. Paper presented at the Society of Personality and Social Psychology, San Antonio, TX First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nosek, B.A., Banaji, M.R. (2002). (At least) two factors moderate the relationship between implicit and explicit attitudes. In R.K. Ohme & M. Jarymowicz (Eds.), Natura Automatyzmow [The nature of automaticity] (pp. 49-56). Warszawa: WIP PAN & SWPS First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nosek, B.A., Banaji, M.R., Greenwald, A.G. (2002). Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 101–115 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pettigrew, T.F., Mertens, R.W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 57–75 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Plant, E.A., Devine, P.G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 811–832 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pryor, J.B., Gibbons, E.X., Wicklund, R.A., Fazio, R.B., Hood, R. (1977). Self-focused attention and self-report validity. Journal of Personality, 45, 513–527 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitt, M., Eid, M., Maes, J. (2003). Synergistic person × situation interaction in distributive justice behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 141–147 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitt, M., Maes, J. (2001). Gerechtigkeit als innerdeutsches Problem: Gesamtes Erhebungsinstrumentarium. [Justice issues in united Germany: Measurement instruments]. University of Trier, Germany First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitt, M., Sabbagh, C. (2004). Synergistic person × situation interaction in distributive justice judgment and allocation behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 359–371 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Strack, F., Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220–247 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar