Abstract
A moderated consistency model is presented, which attempts to explain the consistency between explicit and implicit indicators as a function of awareness and adjustment. In a study on attitudes of Germans toward Turks, we tested the hypothesis that functionally equivalent person and situation moderators pertaining to awareness and adjustment show a synergistic interplay. Concerning moderators of adjustment, no effects on explicit-implicit consistency were obtained for situational variables nor for the interaction of personal and situational variables. However, concerning moderators of awareness, a reliable first-order effect was found for Private Self-Consciousness. Moreover, Private Self-Consciousness and experimentally manipulated motivation to introspect showed the assumed synergistic interaction moderator effect. The empirical findings are discussed with regard to the role of awareness of implicit attitudes and the potentially underlying mechanisms of implicit-explicit consistency.
References
(1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage
(2002). Double dissociation between implicit and explicit personality self-concept: The case of shy behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 380–393
(2003). Die Skala Motivation zu vorurteilsfreiem Verhalten: Skaleneigenschaften und Validierung. [The scale motivation to act without prejudice. Psychometric properties and validities.] Diagnostika, 49, 4–13
(2001). Implicit attitudes towards homosexuality: Reliability, validity, and controllability of the IAT. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 145–160
(2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822–848
(1983). Analysis of multiplicative combination rules when the causal variables are measured with error. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 549–562
(1991). The next generation of moderator research in personality psychology. Journal of Personality, 59, 143–178
(2001). Implicit and explicit attitudes: Examination of the relationship between measures of in-group bias. In R. Brown & S. Gaertner (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology, Vol. 4: Intergroup processes (pp. 175-197). Oxford: Blackwell
(1997). An individual difference measure of motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 316–326
(1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. XXIII, pp. 75-109). New York: Academic Press
(2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297–327
(1975). Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 522–527
Eds. (1989). Fragebogen zur Erfassung dispositionaler Selbstaufmerksamkeit (SAM). [Questionnaire for assessing dispositional self-consciousness]. Göttingen: Hogrefe
(2002). What does the Implicit Association Test measure? A test of the convergent and discriminant validity of prejudice related IATs. Experimental Psychology, 49, 171–180
(in press). Are “implicit” attitudes unconscious?. Consciousness and Cognition,
(1983). Self-attention and self-report: The “veridicality” hypothesis. Journal of Personality, 51, 517–542
(1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27
(1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480
(2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test I: An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216
(2006). Moderatoren der Konsistenz implizit und explizit erfasster Einstellungen und Persönlichkeitsmerkmale. [Moderators of the consistency of implicitly and explicitly assessed attitudes and personality traits] Psychologische Rundschau, 57, 13–33
(1993). When does introspection bear fruit? Self-reflection, self-insight, and interpersonal choices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 35–43
(2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1369–1385
(2005). On implicit-explicit consistency: The moderating role of individual differences in awareness and adjustment. European Journal of Personality, 9, 25–49
(in press). What moderates implicit-explicit consistency?. European Review of Social Psychology,
(1988). Profiting from controversy: Lessons from the person-situation debate. American Psychologist, 43, 23–34
(2005). Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 565–584
(2001). Privately expressed attitudes mediate the relationship between public and implicit attitudes. Paper presented at the Society of Personality and Social Psychology, San Antonio, TX
(2002). (At least) two factors moderate the relationship between implicit and explicit attitudes. In R.K. Ohme & M. Jarymowicz (Eds.), Natura Automatyzmow [The nature of automaticity] (pp. 49-56). Warszawa: WIP PAN & SWPS
(2002). Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 101–115
(1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 57–75
(1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 811–832
(1977). Self-focused attention and self-report validity. Journal of Personality, 45, 513–527
(2003). Synergistic person × situation interaction in distributive justice behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 141–147
(2001). Gerechtigkeit als innerdeutsches Problem: Gesamtes Erhebungsinstrumentarium. [Justice issues in united Germany: Measurement instruments]. University of Trier, Germany
(2004). Synergistic person × situation interaction in distributive justice judgment and allocation behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 359–371
(2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220–247