Moderatoren der Konsistenz implizit und explizit erfasster Einstellungen und Persönlichkeitsmerkmale
Abstract
Zusammenfassung. In zahlreichen Studien zeigte sich, dass implizit erfasste Einstellungen und Persönlichkeitseigenschaften (z.B. mit Hilfe eines Impliziten Assoziationstests von Greenwald et al., 1998) nur mäßig mit Selbstberichtsmaßen für das “gleiche“ Konstrukt korrelieren. Zunächst greifen wir frühere Diskussionen der Konsistenzproblematik auf und erörtern die Frage, welche Variablen den fraglichen Zusammenhang moderieren. Dann schlagen wir ein Prozessmodell vor, aus dem sich Randbedingungen ergeben, unter denen implizite und explizite Indikatoren konvergieren. Das Modell kann die Mehrzahl der empirischen Moderatorbefunde erklären. Bekannte Konsistenzmoderatoren lassen sich vier Kategorien zuordnen: Methodisch triviale Moderatoren (z.B. die Reliabilität der verwendeten Maße), Attribute der jeweiligen Disposition (z.B. die Wichtigkeit einer Einstellung), Merkmale von Personen (z.B. das Anerkennungsmotiv), Merkmale von Situationen (z.B. Anwesenheit anderer). Die Übertragung der Erkenntnisse aus den früheren Konsistenzkontroversen auf die aktuelle Diskussion um die Brauchbarkeit von impliziten Verfahren zur Messung von Einstellungen und Persönlichkeitseigenschaften erweist sich als fruchtbar.
Abstract. Many studies have shown that implicitly assessed attitudes and personality traits (e.g., measured with an Implicit Association Test; Greenwald et al., 1998) and self-reports of the same construct correlate only weakly. Following up on previous work on consistency, we identify variables that might moderate the relationship between implicit and explicit indicators of attitudes and personality traits. Subsequently, we propose a process model that specifies conditions under which implicit and explicit indicators of the same construct should converge. The model can account for the majority of moderator effects that have been reported in the literature. Consistency moderators can be divided into four groups: Methodological trivial moderators (e.g., reliability), attributes of dispositions (e.g., attitude importance), person factors (e.g., approval motive), and situation factors (e.g., presence vs. absence of others). Our review demonstrates that insights from earlier consistency controversies applied fruitfully to the current issue of implicit-explicit consistency.
Literatur
Ajzen, I. T. , Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84 , 888– 918Amelang, M. , Borkenau, P. (1986). The trait concept: Current theoretical considerations, empirical facts, and implications for personality inventory construction. In A. Angleitner & J. S. Wiggins (Eds.), Personality Assessment via Questionnaires (pp. 7-34). Berlin: SpringerAsendorpf, J. B. , Banse, R. , Mücke, D. (2002). Double dissociation between implicit and explicit personality self-concept: The case of shy behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83 , 380– 393Banse, R. , Fischer, I. (2002, Juli). Implicit and explicit aggressiveness and the prediction of aggressive behaviour . Paper presented at the Conference on Personality of the European Association of Personality Psychology, Jena; GermanyBanse, R. , Gawronski, B. (2003). Die Skala Motivation zu vorurteilsfreiem Verhalten: Skaleneigenschaften und Validierung. Diagnostika, 49 , 4– 13Banse, R. , Seise, J. , Zerbes, N. (2001). Implicit attitudes towards homosexuality: Reliability, validity, and controllability of the IAT. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48 , 145– 160Bargh, J. A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook in social cognition (2 ed., Vol. 1, pp. 1-40). Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumBaumeister, R. F. , Tice, D. M. (1988). Metatraits. Journal of Personality, 56 , 571– 598Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. VI, pp. 1-62). New York: Academic PressBem, D. J. , Allen, A. (1974). On predicting some of the people some of the time: The search for cross-situational consistency in behavior. Psychological Review, 81 , 506– 520Bessenoff, G. R. , Sherman, J. W. (2000). Automatic and controlled components of prejudice toward fat people: Evaluation versus stereotype activation. Social Cognition, 18 , 329– 359Blair, I. V. (2001). Implicit stereotypes and prejudice. In G. Moskowitz (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology: On the tenure and future of social cognition (pp. 359-374). Mahwah, NJ: ErlbaumBlair, I. V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6 , 242– 261Borkenau, P. (1993). To predict some of the people more of the time: Individual traits and the prediction of behavior. In K. H. Craik, R. Hogan & R. N. Wolfe (Eds.), Fifty years of Personality Psychology (pp. 237-249). New York: Plenum PressBosson, J. K. , Swann, W. B., Jr. , Pennebaker, J. W. (2000). Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self-esteem: The blind men and the elephant revisited?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79 , 631– 643Brown, K. W. , Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84 , 822– 848Buss, A. H. (Ed.) (1980). Self-Consciousness and Social Anxiety . San Francisco: FreemanByrne, D. , Holcomb, J. (1962). The reliability of a response measure: Differential recognition-threshold scores. Psychological Bulletin, 59 , 70– 72Chaplin, W. F. (1991). The next generation of moderator research in personality psychology. Journal of Personality, 59 , 143– 178Cunningham, W. A. , Preacher, K. J. , Banaji, M. R. (2001). Implicit attitude measurement: Consistency, stability, and convergent validity. Psychological Science, 12 , 163– 170De Houwer, J. (in press) What are implicit measures and why are we using them?. In R. W. Wiers & A. W. Stacy (Eds.), The handbook of implicit cognition and addiction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage PublishersDovidio, J. F. , Kawakami, K. , Gaertner, S. L. (2002). Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82 , 62– 68Dovidio, J. F. , Kawakami, K. , Johnson, C. , Johnson, B. , Howard, A. (1997). On the nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33 , 510– 540Dunton, B. C. , Fazio, R. H. (1997). An individual difference measure of motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23 , 316– 326Egloff, B. , Schmukle, S. C. (2003). Does social desirability moderate the relationship between implicit and explicit anxiety measures?. Personality and Individual Differences, 35 , 1697– 1706Egloff, B. , Schmukle, S. C. (2004). Gender differences in implicit and explicit anxiety measures. Personality and Individual Differences, Jun, 36 , 1807– 1815Egloff, B. , Schmukle, S. C. (2002). Predictive validity of an implicit association test for assessing anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83 , 1441– 1455Epstein, S. , O’Brien, E. (1985). The person-situation debate in historical and current perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 98 , 513– 537Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. XXIII, pp. 75-109). New York: Academic PressFazio, R. H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 247-282). Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumFazio, R. H. , Hilden, L. E. (2001). Emotional reactions to a seemingly prejudiced response: The role of automatically activated racial attitudes and motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27 , 538– 549Fazio, R. H. , Jackson, J. R. , Dunton, B. C. , Williams, C. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobstrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69 , 1013– 1027Fazio, R. H. , Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and uses. Annual Review of Psychology, 54 , 297– 327Fazio, R. H. , Zanna, M. P. (1978). Attitudinal qualities relating to the strength of the attitude-behavior relationship. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14 , 398– 408Fazio, R. H. , Zanna, M. P. (1981). Direct experience and attitude-behavior consistency. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. XIV, pp. 161-202). New York: Academic PressFenigstein, A. , Scheier, M. F. , Buss, A. H. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42 , 522– 527Fiske, D. W. , Rice, L. (1955). Intra-individual response variability. Psychological Bulletin, 52 , 217– 250Florack, A. , Scarabis, M. , Bless, H. (2001a). Der Einfluss wahrgenommener Bedrohung auf die Nutzung automatischer Assoziationen bei der Personenbeurteilung. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 32 , 249– 260Florack, A. , Scarabis, M. , Bless, H. (2001b). When do associations matter? The use of automatic associations towards ethnic groups in person judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37 , 518– 524Gabriel, U. , Banse, R. , Hug, F. (2002). The prediction of private and public spontaneous helping behavior by implicit attitudes and the motivation to control prejudiced behavior . Unpublished manuscript. Universität BernGawronski, B. (2002). What does the Implicit Association Test measure? A test of the convergent and discriminant validity of prejudice related IATs. Experimantal Psychology, 49 , 171– 180Gawronski, B. , Conrey, F. R. (2004). Der Implizite Assoziationstest als Maß automatisch aktivierter Assoziationen: Reichweite und Grenzen. Psychologische Rundschau, 55 , 118– 126Gawronski, B. , Geschke, D. , Banse, R. (2003). Implicit bias in impression formation: Associations influence the construal of individuating information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33 , 573– 589Gawronski, B. , Strack, F. (2004). On the propositional nature of cognitive consistency. Dissonance changes explicit, but not implicit attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40 , 535– 542Gawronski, B. , Strack, F. , Bodenhausen, G. V. (in press) Attitudes and cognitive consistency: The role of associative and propositional processes. In R. E. Petty, R. H. Fazio & P. Briñol (Eds.), Attitudes: Insights from the new wave of implicit measuresGibbons, F. X. (1983). Self-attention and self-report: The “Veridicality“ hypothesis. Journal of Personality, 51 , 517– 542Greenwald, A. G. , Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102 , 4– 27Greenwald, A. G. , McGhee, D. E. , Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74 , 1464– 1480Greenwald, A. G. , Nosek, B. A. (2001). Health of the Implicit Association Test at age 3. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48 , 85– 93Grover, V. P. , Keel, P. K. , Mitchell, J. P. (2003). Gender differences in implicit weight identity. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 34 , 125– 135Gschwendner, T. , Hofmann, W. , Schmitt, M. (2004). On implicit-explicit consistency: Do functionally equivalent situational and personal variables of awareness and adjustment serve as moderators? . Unpublished manuscript. Universität Koblenz-LandauHartshorne, H. , May, M. A. (Eds.) (1928). Studies in the nature of character (Vol. I: Studies in deceit). New York: MacmillanHofmann, W. , Gawronski, B. , Gschwendner, T. , Le, H. , Schmitt, M. (2005a). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31 , 1369– 1385Hofmann, W. , Gschwendner, T. , Schmitt, M. (2005b). On implicit-explicit consistency: The moderating role of individual differences in awareness and adjustment. European Journal of Personality, 19 , 25– 49Karpinski, A. , Steinman, R. B. , Hilton, J. L. (2005). Attitude importance as a moderator of the relationship between implicit and explicit attitude measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31 , 949– 962Kenrick, D. T. , Funder, D. C. (1988). Profiting from controversy: Lessons from the person-situation debate. American Psychologist, 43 , 23– 34Kim, D. Y. (2003). Voluntary controllability of the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Social Psychology Quarterly, 66 , 83– 96Kogan, N. , Wallach, M. A. (Eds.) (1964). Risk taking: A study in cognition and personality . New York: Holt, Rinehart & WinstonKoole, S. L. , Dijksterhuis, A. , van Knippenberg, A. (2001). What’s in a name: implicit self-esteem and the automatic self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80 , 669– 685Lambert, A. J. , Payne, B. K. , Ramsey, S. , Shaffer, L. M. (2005). On the predictive validity of implicit attitude measures: The moderating effect of perceived group variability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41 , 114– 128LaPiere, R. T. (1934). Attitudes versus action. Social Forces, 13 , 230– 237Lentz, T. F. (1934). Reliability of the opinionnaire technique studied intensively by the retest method. Journal of Social Psychology, 5 , 338– 364Marsh, K. L. , Johnson, B. T. , Scott-Sheldon, L. A. (2001). Heart versus reason in condom use: Implicit versus explicit attitudinal predictors of sexual behavior. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48 , 161– 175McConnell, A. R. , Leibold, J. M. (2001). Relations among the Implicit Association Test, discriminatory behavior, and explicit measures of racial attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37 , 435– 442Mierke, J. , Klauer, K. C. (2001). Implicit association measurement with the IAT: Evidence for effects of executive control processes. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48 , 107– 122Mierke, J. , Klauer, K. C. (2003). Method-specific variance in the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85 , 1180– 1192Mischel, W. (Ed.) (1968). Personality and assessment . New York: WileyMonson, T. C. , Hesley, J. W. , Chernick, L. (1982). Specifying when personality traits can and cannot predict behavior. An alternative to abandoning the attempt to predict single act criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43 , 385– 399Moskowitz, G. B. , Gollwitzer, P. M. , Wasel, W. , Schaal, B. (1999). Preconscious control of stereotype activation through chronic egalitarian goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77 , 167– 184Neumann, R. , Hülsenbeck, K. , Seibt, B. (2004). Attitudes toward people with AIDS and avoidance behavior: Automatic and reflective bases of behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40 , 543– 550Nier, J. A. (2005). How dissociated are implicit and explicit racial attitudes? A bogus pipeline approach. Group Processes Intergroup Relations, 8 , 39– 52Norman, D. A. , Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action. Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self regulation: Advances in research (pp. 1-18). New York: Plenum PressNosek, B. A. (2005). Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit attitudes. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 134 , 4 (Nov. 2005). 565– 584Nosek, B. A. , Banaji, M. R. , Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6 , 101– 115Nosek, B. A. , Greenwald, A. G. , Banaji, M. R. (2005). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method variables and construct validity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31 , 166– 180Nuttin, J. M. (1985). Narcissism beyond Gestalt and awareness: The name letter effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15 , 353– 361Olson, M. A. , Fazio, R. H. (2004a). Reducing the influence of extrapersonal associations on the Implicit Association Test: Personalizing the IAT. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86 , 653– 667Olson, M. A. , Fazio, R. H. (2004b). Trait inferences as a function of automatically activated racial attitudes and motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26 , 1– 11Paunonen, S. V. (1984). The reliability of aggregated measurements: Lessons to be learned from psychometric theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 18 , 383– 394Pelham, B. W. , Koole, S. L. , Hardin, C. D. , Hetts, J. J. , Seah, E. , DeHart, T. (2005). Gender moderates the relation between implicit and explicit self-esteem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41 , 84– 89Perugini, M. (2005). Predictive models of implicit and explicit attitudes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44 , 29– 45Petty, R. E. , Cacioppo, J. T. (Eds.) (1996). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches . Bolder, CO: Westview PressPlant, E. A. , Devine, P. G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75 , 811– 832Rudman, L. A. , Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57 , 743– 762Rudman, L. A. , Lee, M. R. (2002). Implicit and explicit consequences of exposure to violent and misogynous rap music. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 5 , 133– 150Schmitt, M. (1990). Konsistenz als Persönlichkeitseigenschaft? Moderatorvariablen in der Persönlichkeits- und Einstellungsforschung . Berlin: SpringerSchmitt, M. (1992). Interindividuelle Konsistenzunterschiede als Herausforderung für die Differentielle Psychologie. Psychologische Rundschau, 43 , 30– 45Schmitt, M. (2005). Interaktionistische Ansätze. In H. Weber & T. Rammsayer (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Persönlichkeitspsychologie und Differentiellen Psychologie (S. 104-115). Göttingen: HogrefeSchmitt, M. , Borkenau, P. (1992). The consistency of personality. In G.-V. Caprara & G. L. V. Heck (Eds.), Modern personality psychology. Critical reviews and new directions (pp. 29-55). New York: Harvester-WheatsheafSchmukle, S. C. , Egloff, B. (2004). Does the Implicit Association Test for assessing anxiety measure trait and state variance?. European Journal of Personality, 18 , 483– 494Sherman, S. J. , Rose, J. S. , Koch, K. , Presson, C. C. , Chassin, L. (2003). Implicit and explicit attitudes toward cigarette smoking: The effects of context and motivation. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 22 , 13– 39Smith, E. C. , DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psycholoy: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4 , 108– 131Snyder, M. (1974). The self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30 , 526– 537Snyder, M. , Ickes, W. (1985). Personality and social behavior. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. II, pp. 883-947). New York: Random HouseSteffens, M. C. , Buchner, A. (2003). Implicit Association Test: Separating transsituationally stable and variable components of attitudes toward gay men. Experimental Psychology, 50 , 33– 48Steffens, M. C. , Plewe, I. (2001). Items’ cross-category associations as a confounding factor in the Implicit Association Test. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48 , 123– 134Stöber, J. (1999). Die Soziale-Erwünschtheits-Skala-17 (SES-17): Entwicklung und erste Befunde zu Reliabilität und Validität. Diagnostica, 45 , 173– 177Strack, F. , Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8 , 220– 247Swanson, J. E. , Rudman, L. A. , Greenwald, A. G. (2001). Using the Implicit Association Test to investigate attitude-behaviour consistency for stigmatised behaviour. Cognition and Emotion, 15 , 207– 230Teachman, B. A. , Brownell, K. D. (2001). Implicit anti-fat bias among health professionals: Is anyone immune?. International Journal of Obesity, 25 , 1525– 1531Turner, R. G. (1978). Consistency, self-consciousness, and the predictive validity of typical and maximal personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 12 , 117– 132Vargas, P. T. (2004). On the Relationship Between Implicit Attitudes and Behaviour: Some Lessons from the Past, and Directions for the Future. In G. Haddock & G. R. Maio (Eds.), Contemporary Perspectives on the Psychology of Attitudes. London: Psychology PressVerplanken, B. (1989). Involvement and need for cognition as moderators of beliefs-attitude-intention consistency. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28 , 115– 122Wicker, A. W. (1969). Attitudes versus actions: The relationship of verbal and overt behavioral responses to attitude objects. Journal of Social Issues, 25 , 41– 78Wicklund, R. A. , Gollwitzer, P. M. (1987). The fallacy of the private-public self-focus distinction. Journal of Personality, 55 , 491– 523Wilson, T. D. , Lindsey, S. , Schooler, T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107 , 101– 126Wittenbrink, B. , Judd, C. M. , Park, B. (2001). Spontaneous prejudice in context: Variability in automatically activated attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81 , 815– 827Zanna, M. P. , Fazio, R. H. (1982). The attitude-behavior relation: Moving toward a third generation of research. In M. P. Zanna, E. T. Higgins & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Consistency in social behavior: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 2, pp. 283-301). Hillsdale, N.J: ErlbaumZuckerman, M. , Koestner, R. , DeBoy, T. , Garcia, T. , Maresca, B. C. , Sartoris, J. M. (1988). To predict some of the people some of the time: A reexamination of the moderator variable approach in personality theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 , 1006– 1019