Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042.57.1.13

Zusammenfassung. In zahlreichen Studien zeigte sich, dass implizit erfasste Einstellungen und Persönlichkeitseigenschaften (z.B. mit Hilfe eines Impliziten Assoziationstests von Greenwald et al., 1998) nur mäßig mit Selbstberichtsmaßen für das “gleiche“ Konstrukt korrelieren. Zunächst greifen wir frühere Diskussionen der Konsistenzproblematik auf und erörtern die Frage, welche Variablen den fraglichen Zusammenhang moderieren. Dann schlagen wir ein Prozessmodell vor, aus dem sich Randbedingungen ergeben, unter denen implizite und explizite Indikatoren konvergieren. Das Modell kann die Mehrzahl der empirischen Moderatorbefunde erklären. Bekannte Konsistenzmoderatoren lassen sich vier Kategorien zuordnen: Methodisch triviale Moderatoren (z.B. die Reliabilität der verwendeten Maße), Attribute der jeweiligen Disposition (z.B. die Wichtigkeit einer Einstellung), Merkmale von Personen (z.B. das Anerkennungsmotiv), Merkmale von Situationen (z.B. Anwesenheit anderer). Die Übertragung der Erkenntnisse aus den früheren Konsistenzkontroversen auf die aktuelle Diskussion um die Brauchbarkeit von impliziten Verfahren zur Messung von Einstellungen und Persönlichkeitseigenschaften erweist sich als fruchtbar.


Moderators of the consistency of implicitly and explicitly assessed attitudes and personality traits

Abstract. Many studies have shown that implicitly assessed attitudes and personality traits (e.g., measured with an Implicit Association Test; Greenwald et al., 1998) and self-reports of the same construct correlate only weakly. Following up on previous work on consistency, we identify variables that might moderate the relationship between implicit and explicit indicators of attitudes and personality traits. Subsequently, we propose a process model that specifies conditions under which implicit and explicit indicators of the same construct should converge. The model can account for the majority of moderator effects that have been reported in the literature. Consistency moderators can be divided into four groups: Methodological trivial moderators (e.g., reliability), attributes of dispositions (e.g., attitude importance), person factors (e.g., approval motive), and situation factors (e.g., presence vs. absence of others). Our review demonstrates that insights from earlier consistency controversies applied fruitfully to the current issue of implicit-explicit consistency.

Literatur

  • Ajzen, I. T. , Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84 , 888– 918 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Amelang, M. , Borkenau, P. (1986). The trait concept: Current theoretical considerations, empirical facts, and implications for personality inventory construction. In A. Angleitner & J. S. Wiggins (Eds.), Personality Assessment via Questionnaires (pp. 7-34). Berlin: Springer First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Asendorpf, J. B. , Banse, R. , Mücke, D. (2002). Double dissociation between implicit and explicit personality self-concept: The case of shy behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83 , 380– 393 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Banse, R. , Fischer, I. (2002, Juli). Implicit and explicit aggressiveness and the prediction of aggressive behaviour . Paper presented at the Conference on Personality of the European Association of Personality Psychology, Jena; Germany First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Banse, R. , Gawronski, B. (2003). Die Skala Motivation zu vorurteilsfreiem Verhalten: Skaleneigenschaften und Validierung. Diagnostika, 49 , 4– 13 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Banse, R. , Seise, J. , Zerbes, N. (2001). Implicit attitudes towards homosexuality: Reliability, validity, and controllability of the IAT. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48 , 145– 160 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Bargh, J. A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook in social cognition (2 ed., Vol. 1, pp. 1-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Baumeister, R. F. , Tice, D. M. (1988). Metatraits. Journal of Personality, 56 , 571– 598 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. VI, pp. 1-62). New York: Academic Press First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bem, D. J. , Allen, A. (1974). On predicting some of the people some of the time: The search for cross-situational consistency in behavior. Psychological Review, 81 , 506– 520 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bessenoff, G. R. , Sherman, J. W. (2000). Automatic and controlled components of prejudice toward fat people: Evaluation versus stereotype activation. Social Cognition, 18 , 329– 359 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blair, I. V. (2001). Implicit stereotypes and prejudice. In G. Moskowitz (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology: On the tenure and future of social cognition (pp. 359-374). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Blair, I. V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6 , 242– 261 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Borkenau, P. (1993). To predict some of the people more of the time: Individual traits and the prediction of behavior. In K. H. Craik, R. Hogan & R. N. Wolfe (Eds.), Fifty years of Personality Psychology (pp. 237-249). New York: Plenum Press First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bosson, J. K. , Swann, W. B., Jr. , Pennebaker, J. W. (2000). Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self-esteem: The blind men and the elephant revisited?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79 , 631– 643 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, K. W. , Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84 , 822– 848 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Buss, A. H. (Ed.) (1980). Self-Consciousness and Social Anxiety . San Francisco: Freeman First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Byrne, D. , Holcomb, J. (1962). The reliability of a response measure: Differential recognition-threshold scores. Psychological Bulletin, 59 , 70– 72 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chaplin, W. F. (1991). The next generation of moderator research in personality psychology. Journal of Personality, 59 , 143– 178 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cunningham, W. A. , Preacher, K. J. , Banaji, M. R. (2001). Implicit attitude measurement: Consistency, stability, and convergent validity. Psychological Science, 12 , 163– 170 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Houwer, J. (in press) What are implicit measures and why are we using them?. In R. W. Wiers & A. W. Stacy (Eds.), The handbook of implicit cognition and addiction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dovidio, J. F. , Kawakami, K. , Gaertner, S. L. (2002). Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82 , 62– 68 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dovidio, J. F. , Kawakami, K. , Johnson, C. , Johnson, B. , Howard, A. (1997). On the nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33 , 510– 540 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dunton, B. C. , Fazio, R. H. (1997). An individual difference measure of motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23 , 316– 326 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Egloff, B. , Schmukle, S. C. (2003). Does social desirability moderate the relationship between implicit and explicit anxiety measures?. Personality and Individual Differences, 35 , 1697– 1706 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Egloff, B. , Schmukle, S. C. (2004). Gender differences in implicit and explicit anxiety measures. Personality and Individual Differences, Jun, 36 , 1807– 1815 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Egloff, B. , Schmukle, S. C. (2002). Predictive validity of an implicit association test for assessing anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83 , 1441– 1455 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Epstein, S. , O’Brien, E. (1985). The person-situation debate in historical and current perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 98 , 513– 537 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. XXIII, pp. 75-109). New York: Academic Press First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fazio, R. H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 247-282). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fazio, R. H. , Hilden, L. E. (2001). Emotional reactions to a seemingly prejudiced response: The role of automatically activated racial attitudes and motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27 , 538– 549 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fazio, R. H. , Jackson, J. R. , Dunton, B. C. , Williams, C. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobstrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69 , 1013– 1027 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fazio, R. H. , Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and uses. Annual Review of Psychology, 54 , 297– 327 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fazio, R. H. , Zanna, M. P. (1978). Attitudinal qualities relating to the strength of the attitude-behavior relationship. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14 , 398– 408 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fazio, R. H. , Zanna, M. P. (1981). Direct experience and attitude-behavior consistency. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. XIV, pp. 161-202). New York: Academic Press First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fenigstein, A. , Scheier, M. F. , Buss, A. H. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42 , 522– 527 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fiske, D. W. , Rice, L. (1955). Intra-individual response variability. Psychological Bulletin, 52 , 217– 250 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Florack, A. , Scarabis, M. , Bless, H. (2001a). Der Einfluss wahrgenommener Bedrohung auf die Nutzung automatischer Assoziationen bei der Personenbeurteilung. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 32 , 249– 260 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Florack, A. , Scarabis, M. , Bless, H. (2001b). When do associations matter? The use of automatic associations towards ethnic groups in person judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37 , 518– 524 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gabriel, U. , Banse, R. , Hug, F. (2002). The prediction of private and public spontaneous helping behavior by implicit attitudes and the motivation to control prejudiced behavior . Unpublished manuscript. Universität Bern First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gawronski, B. (2002). What does the Implicit Association Test measure? A test of the convergent and discriminant validity of prejudice related IATs. Experimantal Psychology, 49 , 171– 180 First citation in articleAbstractGoogle Scholar

  • Gawronski, B. , Conrey, F. R. (2004). Der Implizite Assoziationstest als Maß automatisch aktivierter Assoziationen: Reichweite und Grenzen. Psychologische Rundschau, 55 , 118– 126 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Gawronski, B. , Geschke, D. , Banse, R. (2003). Implicit bias in impression formation: Associations influence the construal of individuating information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33 , 573– 589 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gawronski, B. , Strack, F. (2004). On the propositional nature of cognitive consistency. Dissonance changes explicit, but not implicit attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40 , 535– 542 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gawronski, B. , Strack, F. , Bodenhausen, G. V. (in press) Attitudes and cognitive consistency: The role of associative and propositional processes. In R. E. Petty, R. H. Fazio & P. Briñol (Eds.), Attitudes: Insights from the new wave of implicit measures First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gibbons, F. X. (1983). Self-attention and self-report: The “Veridicality“ hypothesis. Journal of Personality, 51 , 517– 542 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greenwald, A. G. , Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102 , 4– 27 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greenwald, A. G. , McGhee, D. E. , Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74 , 1464– 1480 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greenwald, A. G. , Nosek, B. A. (2001). Health of the Implicit Association Test at age 3. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48 , 85– 93 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Grover, V. P. , Keel, P. K. , Mitchell, J. P. (2003). Gender differences in implicit weight identity. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 34 , 125– 135 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gschwendner, T. , Hofmann, W. , Schmitt, M. (2004). On implicit-explicit consistency: Do functionally equivalent situational and personal variables of awareness and adjustment serve as moderators? . Unpublished manuscript. Universität Koblenz-Landau First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hartshorne, H. , May, M. A. (Eds.) (1928). Studies in the nature of character (Vol. I: Studies in deceit). New York: Macmillan First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hofmann, W. , Gawronski, B. , Gschwendner, T. , Le, H. , Schmitt, M. (2005a). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31 , 1369– 1385 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hofmann, W. , Gschwendner, T. , Schmitt, M. (2005b). On implicit-explicit consistency: The moderating role of individual differences in awareness and adjustment. European Journal of Personality, 19 , 25– 49 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Karpinski, A. , Steinman, R. B. , Hilton, J. L. (2005). Attitude importance as a moderator of the relationship between implicit and explicit attitude measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31 , 949– 962 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kenrick, D. T. , Funder, D. C. (1988). Profiting from controversy: Lessons from the person-situation debate. American Psychologist, 43 , 23– 34 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kim, D. Y. (2003). Voluntary controllability of the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Social Psychology Quarterly, 66 , 83– 96 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kogan, N. , Wallach, M. A. (Eds.) (1964). Risk taking: A study in cognition and personality . New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Koole, S. L. , Dijksterhuis, A. , van Knippenberg, A. (2001). What’s in a name: implicit self-esteem and the automatic self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80 , 669– 685 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lambert, A. J. , Payne, B. K. , Ramsey, S. , Shaffer, L. M. (2005). On the predictive validity of implicit attitude measures: The moderating effect of perceived group variability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41 , 114– 128 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • LaPiere, R. T. (1934). Attitudes versus action. Social Forces, 13 , 230– 237 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lentz, T. F. (1934). Reliability of the opinionnaire technique studied intensively by the retest method. Journal of Social Psychology, 5 , 338– 364 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, K. L. , Johnson, B. T. , Scott-Sheldon, L. A. (2001). Heart versus reason in condom use: Implicit versus explicit attitudinal predictors of sexual behavior. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48 , 161– 175 First citation in articleAbstractGoogle Scholar

  • McConnell, A. R. , Leibold, J. M. (2001). Relations among the Implicit Association Test, discriminatory behavior, and explicit measures of racial attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37 , 435– 442 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mierke, J. , Klauer, K. C. (2001). Implicit association measurement with the IAT: Evidence for effects of executive control processes. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48 , 107– 122 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Mierke, J. , Klauer, K. C. (2003). Method-specific variance in the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85 , 1180– 1192 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mischel, W. (Ed.) (1968). Personality and assessment . New York: Wiley First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Monson, T. C. , Hesley, J. W. , Chernick, L. (1982). Specifying when personality traits can and cannot predict behavior. An alternative to abandoning the attempt to predict single act criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43 , 385– 399 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moskowitz, G. B. , Gollwitzer, P. M. , Wasel, W. , Schaal, B. (1999). Preconscious control of stereotype activation through chronic egalitarian goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77 , 167– 184 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Neumann, R. , Hülsenbeck, K. , Seibt, B. (2004). Attitudes toward people with AIDS and avoidance behavior: Automatic and reflective bases of behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40 , 543– 550 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nier, J. A. (2005). How dissociated are implicit and explicit racial attitudes? A bogus pipeline approach. Group Processes Intergroup Relations, 8 , 39– 52 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Norman, D. A. , Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action. Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self regulation: Advances in research (pp. 1-18). New York: Plenum Press First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nosek, B. A. (2005). Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit attitudes. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 134 , 4 (Nov. 2005). 565– 584 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nosek, B. A. , Banaji, M. R. , Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6 , 101– 115 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nosek, B. A. , Greenwald, A. G. , Banaji, M. R. (2005). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method variables and construct validity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31 , 166– 180 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nuttin, J. M. (1985). Narcissism beyond Gestalt and awareness: The name letter effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15 , 353– 361 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Olson, M. A. , Fazio, R. H. (2004a). Reducing the influence of extrapersonal associations on the Implicit Association Test: Personalizing the IAT. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86 , 653– 667 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Olson, M. A. , Fazio, R. H. (2004b). Trait inferences as a function of automatically activated racial attitudes and motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26 , 1– 11 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Paunonen, S. V. (1984). The reliability of aggregated measurements: Lessons to be learned from psychometric theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 18 , 383– 394 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pelham, B. W. , Koole, S. L. , Hardin, C. D. , Hetts, J. J. , Seah, E. , DeHart, T. (2005). Gender moderates the relation between implicit and explicit self-esteem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41 , 84– 89 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Perugini, M. (2005). Predictive models of implicit and explicit attitudes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44 , 29– 45 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Petty, R. E. , Cacioppo, J. T. (Eds.) (1996). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches . Bolder, CO: Westview Press First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Plant, E. A. , Devine, P. G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75 , 811– 832 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rudman, L. A. , Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57 , 743– 762 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rudman, L. A. , Lee, M. R. (2002). Implicit and explicit consequences of exposure to violent and misogynous rap music. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 5 , 133– 150 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitt, M. (1990). Konsistenz als Persönlichkeitseigenschaft? Moderatorvariablen in der Persönlichkeits- und Einstellungsforschung . Berlin: Springer First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitt, M. (1992). Interindividuelle Konsistenzunterschiede als Herausforderung für die Differentielle Psychologie. Psychologische Rundschau, 43 , 30– 45 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitt, M. (2005). Interaktionistische Ansätze. In H. Weber & T. Rammsayer (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Persönlichkeitspsychologie und Differentiellen Psychologie (S. 104-115). Göttingen: Hogrefe First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitt, M. , Borkenau, P. (1992). The consistency of personality. In G.-V. Caprara & G. L. V. Heck (Eds.), Modern personality psychology. Critical reviews and new directions (pp. 29-55). New York: Harvester-Wheatsheaf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schmukle, S. C. , Egloff, B. (2004). Does the Implicit Association Test for assessing anxiety measure trait and state variance?. European Journal of Personality, 18 , 483– 494 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sherman, S. J. , Rose, J. S. , Koch, K. , Presson, C. C. , Chassin, L. (2003). Implicit and explicit attitudes toward cigarette smoking: The effects of context and motivation. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 22 , 13– 39 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, E. C. , DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psycholoy: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4 , 108– 131 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Snyder, M. (1974). The self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30 , 526– 537 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Snyder, M. , Ickes, W. (1985). Personality and social behavior. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. II, pp. 883-947). New York: Random House First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Steffens, M. C. , Buchner, A. (2003). Implicit Association Test: Separating transsituationally stable and variable components of attitudes toward gay men. Experimental Psychology, 50 , 33– 48 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Steffens, M. C. , Plewe, I. (2001). Items’ cross-category associations as a confounding factor in the Implicit Association Test. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48 , 123– 134 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Stöber, J. (1999). Die Soziale-Erwünschtheits-Skala-17 (SES-17): Entwicklung und erste Befunde zu Reliabilität und Validität. Diagnostica, 45 , 173– 177 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Strack, F. , Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8 , 220– 247 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Swanson, J. E. , Rudman, L. A. , Greenwald, A. G. (2001). Using the Implicit Association Test to investigate attitude-behaviour consistency for stigmatised behaviour. Cognition and Emotion, 15 , 207– 230 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Teachman, B. A. , Brownell, K. D. (2001). Implicit anti-fat bias among health professionals: Is anyone immune?. International Journal of Obesity, 25 , 1525– 1531 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Turner, R. G. (1978). Consistency, self-consciousness, and the predictive validity of typical and maximal personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 12 , 117– 132 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vargas, P. T. (2004). On the Relationship Between Implicit Attitudes and Behaviour: Some Lessons from the Past, and Directions for the Future. In G. Haddock & G. R. Maio (Eds.), Contemporary Perspectives on the Psychology of Attitudes. London: Psychology Press First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Verplanken, B. (1989). Involvement and need for cognition as moderators of beliefs-attitude-intention consistency. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28 , 115– 122 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wicker, A. W. (1969). Attitudes versus actions: The relationship of verbal and overt behavioral responses to attitude objects. Journal of Social Issues, 25 , 41– 78 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wicklund, R. A. , Gollwitzer, P. M. (1987). The fallacy of the private-public self-focus distinction. Journal of Personality, 55 , 491– 523 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wilson, T. D. , Lindsey, S. , Schooler, T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107 , 101– 126 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wittenbrink, B. , Judd, C. M. , Park, B. (2001). Spontaneous prejudice in context: Variability in automatically activated attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81 , 815– 827 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zanna, M. P. , Fazio, R. H. (1982). The attitude-behavior relation: Moving toward a third generation of research. In M. P. Zanna, E. T. Higgins & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Consistency in social behavior: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 2, pp. 283-301). Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zuckerman, M. , Koestner, R. , DeBoy, T. , Garcia, T. , Maresca, B. C. , Sartoris, J. M. (1988). To predict some of the people some of the time: A reexamination of the moderator variable approach in personality theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 , 1006– 1019 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar