Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000040

Embodied conversational agents (ECAs) are designed to provide natural and intuitive communication with a human user. One major current topic in agent design consequently is to enhance their believability, often by incorporating internal models of emotions or motivations. As psychological theories often lack the necessary details for direct implementation, many agent modelers currently rely on models that are rather marginal in current psychological research, or models that are created ad hoc with little theoretical and empirical foundation. The goal of this article is both to raise psychologists’ awareness of the central challenges in the process of creating psychologically believable agents, and to recommend existing psychological frameworks to the virtual agents community that seem particularly useful for implementation in ECAs. Special attention is paid to a computationally detailed model of basic social motives that seems particularly useful for implementation: the Zurich model of social motivation.

References

  • Atkinson, J. W. , Birch, D. (1970). The dynamics of action. Oxford, UK: John Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Back, M. , Schmukle, . S. C. , Egloff, B. (in press). A closer look at first sight: Social relations lens model analysis of personality and interpersonal attraction at zero acquaintance. European Journal of Personality. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bailenson, J. , Yee, N. (2005). Digital chameleons. Psychological Science, 16, 814–819. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bailenson, J. , Yee, N. , Patel, K. , Beall, A. (2008). Detecting digital chameleons. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 66–87. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bates, J. (1994). The role of emotion in believable characters. Communications of the ACM, 37, 122–125. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Becker-Asano, C. , Wachsmuth, I. (2008). Affect simulation with primary and secondary emotions. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5208, 15–28. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beutler, L. , Harwood, T. (2004). Virtual reality in psychotherapy training. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 317–330. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bischof, N. (1975). A systems approach toward the functional connections of attachment and fear. Child Development, 46, 801–817. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bischof, N. (1996). Untersuchungen zur Systemanalyse der sozialen Motivation IV: Die Spielarten des Lächelns und das Problem der motivationalen Sollwertanpassung [The varieties of smiling and the problem of motivational adjustment]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 204, 1–40. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bischof, N. (2001). Das Rätsel Ödipus. Die biologischen Wurzeln des Urkonflikts von Intimität und Autonomie [The riddle of Oedipus: The biological roots of the core conflict between intimacy and autonomy]. München: Piper. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Blascovich, J. , Loomis, J. , Beall, A. C. , Swinth, K. R. , Hoyt, C. L. , Bailenson, J. N. (2002). Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 103–124. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blumberg, B. (1994). Action-selection in Hamsterdam: Lessons from ethology. Paper presented at the Third Conference on the Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, Cambridge, MA, USA. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Borutta, I. , Sosnowski, S. , Zehetleitner, M. , Bischof, N. , Kühnlenz, K. (2009). Generating artificial smile variations based on a psychological system-theoretic approach. Paper presented at the 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (Ro-Man), Toyama, Japan. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss. New York, NY: Basic Books. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cassell, J. (2000). More than just another pretty face: Embodied conversational interface agents. Communications of the ACM, 43, 70–78. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cassell, J. (2001). Embodied conversational agents: Representation and intelligence in user interfaces. AI Magazine, 22, 67–83. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cassell, J. , Bickmore, T. , Campbell, L. , Vilhjalmsson, H. , Yan, H. (1999). Conversation as a system framework: Designing embodied conversational agents. In J. Cassell, E. Churchill, S. Prevost, J. Sullivan, (Eds.), Embodied conversational agents. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cassell, J. , Churchill, E. , Prevost, S. , Sullivan, J. (2000). Embodied conversational agents. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chartrand, T. , Bargh, J. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893–910. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Rosis, F. , Pelachaud, C. , Poggi, I. , Carofiglio, V. , Carolis, B. (2003). From Greta’s mind to her face: Modelling the dynamics of affective states in a conversational embodied agent. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 1–2, 81–118. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fridlund, A. J. (1991). Evolution and facial action in reflex, social motive, and paralanguage. Biological Psychology, 32, 3–100. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Grammer, K. , Kruck, K. , Magnusson, M. (1998). The courtship dance: Patterns of nonverbal synchronization in opposite-sex encounters. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 22, 3–29. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gratch, J. (2008). True emotion vs. social intentions in nonverbal communication: Towards a synthesis for embodied conversational agents. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4930, 181–197. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gratch, J. , Marsella, S. (2004). A domain-independent framework for modeling emotion. Cognitive Systems Research, 5, 269–306. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gubler, H. , Bischof, N. (1991). A systems theory perspective. In M. E. Lamb, H. Keller, (Eds.), Infant development: Perspectives from German-speaking countries (pp. 35–66). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gubler, H. , Bischof, N. (1993). Untersuchungen zur Systemanalyse der sozialen Motivation II: Computerspiele als Werkzeug der motivationspsychologischen Grundlagenforschung [Computer games as a tool for basic research on motivation]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 201, 287–315. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gubler, H. , Paffrath, M. , Bischof, N. (1994). Untersuchungen zur Systemanalyse der sozialen Motivation III: Eine Ästimationsstudie zur Sicherheits- und Erregungsregulation während der Adoleszenz [An estimation study of security and arousal regulation during adolescence]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 202, 95–132. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hall, J. , Coats, E. , LeBeau, L. (2005). Nonverbal behavior and the vertical dimension of social relations: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 898–924. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Horswill, I. (2008). Attachment and cognitive architecture. Paper presented at the 2008 AAAI Spring Symposium, Stanford, CA, USA. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hudlicka, E. (2003). To feel or not to feel: The role of affect in human–computer interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59, 1–32. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kopp, S. , Gesellensetter, L. , Krämer, N. , Wachsmuth, I. (2005). A conversational agent as museum guide-Design and evaluation of a real-world application. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3661, 329–343. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Krämer, N. , Bente, G. , Eschenburg, F. , Troitzsch, H. (2009). Embodied conversational agents. Social Psychology, 1, 26–36. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Krämer, N. , Iurgel, I. , Bente, G. (2005). Emotion and motivation in embodied conversational agents. Paper presented at the proceedings of the symposium “Agents that want and like,” Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behavior (AISB) 2005, Hatfield. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Krämer, N. C. (2008). Soziale Wirkungen virtueller Helfer. Gestaltung und Evaluation von Mensch-Computer-Interaktion [Social effects of virtual assistants]. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Krumhuber, E. , Manstead, A. , Kappas, A. (2007). Temporal aspects of facial displays in person and expression perception: The effects of smile dynamics, head-tilt, and gender. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 31, 39–56. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kumashiro, M. , Rusbult, C. , & Finkel, E. (2008). Navigating personal and relational concerns: The quest for equilibrium. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 94–110. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.94. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lewin, K. (1931). Environmental forces in child behavior and development. In C. Murchison, (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 94–127). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ludlow, A. (1980). The evolution and simulation of a decision maker. In F. Toates, T. Halliday, (Eds.), Analysis of motivational processes. London: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McFarland, D. J. (1976). Form and function in the temporal organisation of behavior. In P. Bateson, R. Hinde, (Eds.), Growing points of ethology (pp. 55–93). Oxford, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ortony, A. (2003). On making believable emotional agents believable. In R. Trappl, P. Petta, S. Payr, (Eds.), Emotions in humans and artifacts (pp. 189–211). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ortony, A. , Clore, G. L. , Collins, A. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Paleari, M. , Grizard, A. , & Lisetti, C. (2007). Adapting psychologically grounded facial emotional expressions to different anthropomorphic embodiment platforms. Proceedings of the 20th Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society (FLAIRS) 2007 Annual Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Florida. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Petters, D. , Waters, E. (submitted). AI, attachment theory and simulating secure base behaviour: Dr. Bowlby meets the Reverend Bayes. Manuscript submitted for publication. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ramseyer, F. , Tschacher, W. (2008). Synchrony in dyadic psychotherapy sessions. In S. Vrobel, O. E. Rössler, T. Marks-Tarlow, (Eds.), Simultaneity: Temporal structures and observer perspectives (pp. 329–347). Singapore: World Scientific. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Redin, J. (2007). A brief history of mechanical calculators. Retrieved from www.xnumber.com/xnumber/mechanical1.htm. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Riediger, M. , Freund, A. (2008). Me against myself: Motivational conflicts and emotional development in adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 23, 479–494. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rose, R. , Scheutz, M. , & Schermerhorn, P. (2010). Towards a conceptual and methodological framework for determining robot believability. Interaction Studies, 11, 314–335. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scherer, K. R. , Schorr, A. , & Johnstone, T. (2001). Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research. Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schneider, M. (2001). Systems theory of motivational development. In N. J. Smelser, P. B. Baltes, (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences. Oxford: Elsevier. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schönbrodt, F. D. (2007). Interview mit Prof. Dr. Karl Grammer. Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 4, 160–161. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Schönbrodt, F. D. , Asendorpf, J. B. (2011). Virtual social environments as a tool for psychological assessment: Dynamics of interaction with a virtual spouse. Psychological Assessment, 23, 7–17. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schönbrodt, F. D. , Unkelbach, S. , Spinath, F. M. (2009). Broad motives in short scales: A questionnaire for the Zurich Model of social motivation. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 25, 141–149. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Steimer-Krause, E. , Krause, R. , Wagner, G. (1990). Interaction regulations used by schizophrenic and psychosomatic patients: Studies on facial behavior in dyadic interactions. Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes, 53, 209–228. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wehrle, T. (1998). Motivations behind modeling emotional agents: Whose emotion does your robot have. Paper presented at the “Grounding Emotions in Adaptive Systems,” the 5th international conference of the Society for Adaptive Behavior Workshop Notes (SAB’98), Zurich, Switzerland. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar