Skip to main content
Original Article

Embodied Conversational Agents

Research Prospects for Social Psychology and an Exemplary Study

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335.40.1.26

It was analyzed whether an embodied conversational agent (ECA) has specific advantages when employed with privacy invading technologies such as a biometric security system. The study compares the effects of an ECA interface with the effects of conventional text-based and voice-based interfaces on user acceptance and usability. An additional variable was whether the biometric system falsely rejected the user twice or whether it directly accepted him/her. Results of the 2 × 3 between-subjects design indicated that, although overall the text interface is rated most positive, voice and ECA yield distinct social effects: They have more advantageous consequences when problems arise – i.e., when the user is rejected repeatedly. The implications for social psychology in terms of applicability of new research methods as well as insights concerning fundamental research are discussed.

References

  • André, E. , Klesen, M. , Gebhard, P. , Allen, S. , Rist, T. (2000). Exploiting models of personality and emotions to control the behavior of animated interface agents. In J. Rickel, (Ed.), Proceedings of the workshop on “Achieving Human-Like Behavior in Interactive Animated Agents” in conjunction with the Fourth International Conference on Autonomous Agents (pp. 3–7). Barcelona, June 2000. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bailenson, J.N. , Blascovich, J. , Beall, A.C. , Loomis, J.M. (2001). Equilibrium theory revisited: Mutual gaze and personal space in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 10, 583–598. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beall, A.C. , Bailenson, J.N. , Loomis, J. , Blascovich, J. , Rex, C. (2003). Non-zero-sum mutual gaze in collaborative virtual environments. Proceedings of HCI International, 2003, Crete. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bente, G. , Krämer, N.C. (2001). Psychologische Aspekte bei der Implementierung und Evaluierung nonverbal agierender Interface-Agenten [Psychological aspects when implementing and evaluating nonverbally interacting interface agents]. In H. Oberquelle, R. Oppermann, J. Krause, (Eds.), Mensch und Computer 2001 [Human and computer 2001] (pp. 275–285). Stuttgart: Teubner. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bente, G. , Krämer, N.C. , Petersen, A. , de Ruiter, J.P. (2001). Computer-animated movement and person perception. Methodological advances in nonverbal behavior research. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 25, 151–166. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bickmore, T. , Cassell, J. (2004). Social dialog with embodied conversational agents. In J. van Kuppevelt, L. Dybkjaer, N. Bernsen, (Eds.), Natural, intelligent, and effective interaction with multimodal dialog systems. New York: Kluwer Academic. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Blascovich, J. , Loomis, J. , Beall, A.C. , Swinth, K.R. , Hoyt, C.L. , Bailenson, J.N. (2002). Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 103–124. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cassell, J. , Bickmore, T. (2000). External manifestations of trustworthiness in the interface. Communications of the ACM, 43(12), 50–56. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cassell, J. , Bickmore, T. , Billinghurst, M. , Campbell, L. , Chang, K. , Vilhjálmsson, H. et al. (1999). Embodiment in conversational interfaces: Rea. CHI’99 Conference Proceedings (pp. 520–527). New York: Association for Computing Machinery. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cassell, J. , Sullivan, J. , Prevost, S. , Churchill, E. (Eds.). (2000). Embodied conversational agents. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Rosis, F. , De Carolis, B. , Carofiglio, V. , Pizzutilo, S. (2004). Shallow and inner forms of emotional intelligence in advisory dialog simulation. In H. Prendinger, M. Ishizuka, (Eds.), Life-like characters. Tools, affective functions, and applications (pp. 271–294). Berlin: Springer. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dehn, D.M. , van Mulken, S. (2000). The impact of animated interface agents: A review of empirical research. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 52, 1–22. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eschenburg, F. , Troitzsch, H. , Krämer, N. , Bente, G. (2005). Introduction of ECA-based security terminal. D6.4. Unpublished BioSec document. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Echterhoff, G. , Bohner, G. , Siebler, F. (2006). Social Robotics und Mensch-Maschine Interaktion: Aktuelle Forschung und Relevanz für die Sozialpsychologie [Social robotics and human-machine interaction: Current research and relevance for social psychology]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 37, 219–231. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Gazzaniga, M.S. (1998). The mind’s past. Berkeley: University of California Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hoyt, C.L. , Blascovich, J. , Swinth, K.L. (2003). Social inhibition in immersive virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12, 183–195. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kappas, A. (2005). My happy vacuum cleaner. Paper presented at the ISRE General Meeting, Symposium on Artificial Emotions, July 2005, Bari. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kiesler, S. , Sproull, L. (1997). “Social” human-computer interaction. In B. Friedman, (Ed.), Human values and the design of computer technology (pp. 191–199). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Krämer, N.C. (2008). Soziale Wirkungen virtueller Helfer. Gestaltung und Evaluation von Mensch-Computer-Interaktion [Social effects of virtual assistants: Design and evaluation of human-computer interaction]. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Krämer, N.C. (2005). Social communicative effects of a virtual program guide. In T. Panayiotopoulos, J. Gratch, R. Aylett, D. Balin, P. Olivier, T. Rist, (Eds.), Intelligent virtual agents 2005 (pp. 442–543). Hamburg: Springer-Verlag. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Krämer, N.C. , Bente, G. (2007). Die Sozialpsychologie virtueller Helfer [The social psychology of virtual assistants]. In S. Trepte, E. Witte, (Eds.), Von CMC bis Persuasion. Medien und Sozialpsychologie [From CMC to persuasion: Media and social psychology] (pp. 103–138). Lengerich: Pabst. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Krämer, N.C. , Bente, G. , Piesk, J. (2003). The ghost in the machine. The influence of embodied conversational agents on user expectations and user behavior in a TV/VCR application. In G. Bieber, T. Kirste, (Eds.), IMC Workshop 2003, assistance, mobility, applications (pp. 121–128). Rostock: Fraunhofer Publica. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Krämer, N.C. , Simons, N. , Kopp, S. (2007). The effects of an embodied conversational agent’s subtle nonverbal behavior on user’s evaluation and behavioral mimicry. In C. Pelachaud, J.-C. Martin, E. André, G. Chollet, K. Karpouzis, D. Pelé, (Eds.), Intelligent virtual agents 2007, LNAI 4722 (pp. 238–251). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Krämer, N.C. , Tietz, B. , Bente, G. (2003). Effects of embodied interface agents and their gestural activity. In R. Aylett, D. Ballin, T. Rist, J. Rickel, (Eds.), 4th International Working Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (pp. 292–300). Hamburg: Springer-Verlag. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Krumhuber, E. , Kappas, A. (2005). Moving smiles: The role of dynamic components for the perception of the genuineness of smiles. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 29(1), 3–24. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsella, S. , Gratch, J. (2003). Modeling coping behavior in virtual humans: Don’t worry, be happy. Proceedings of the Second International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. ACM Press. Retrieved September 3, 2006 from www.isi.edu/~marsella/webpapers3.html First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nass, C. , Gong, L. (1999). Maximized modality or constrained consistency? Proceedings of AVSP’99 (Santa Cruz, Calif., Aug. 7–9), 1–5. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nass, C. , Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 81–103. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nass, C. , Steuer, J. , Tauber, E.R. (1994). Computers are social actors. In B. Adelson, S. Dumais, J. Olson, (Eds.), Human factors in computing systems: CHI’94 conference proceedings (pp. 72–78). New York: ACM Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Parise, S. , Kiesler, S. , Sproull, L. , Waters, K. (1999). Cooperating with life-like interface agents. Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 123–142. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reeves, B. , Nass, C.I. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. New York: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rickenberg, R. , Reeves, B. (2000). The effects of animated characters on anxiety, task performance, and evaluations of user interfaces. Letters of CHI 2000, April 2000, 49–56. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ruebenstrunk, G. (1998). Emotionale Computer. Computermodelle von Emotionen und ihre Bedeutung für die Emotionspsychologische Forschung [Emotional computers: Computer models of emotions and their relevance for psychological research on emotions]. Diplomarbeit, Universität Bielefeld. Online document. Retrieved on March 25, 2005, from www.schooldays.de/ruebentemp/emeocomp/INHALT.HTM First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schilbach, L. , Wohlschlaeger, A. , Krämer, N.C. , Newen, A. , Zilles, K. , Shah, J.N. et al. (2006). Being with virtual others: Neural correlates of social interaction. Neuropsychologia, 44, 718–730. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sproull, L. , Subramani, M. , Kiesler, S. , Walker, J.H. , Waters, K. (1996). When the interface is a face. Human Computer Interaction, 11, 97–124. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Troitzsch, H. , Eschenburg, F. , Bente, G. , Krämer, N. , Lylykangas, J. , Vuorinen, K. et al. (2005). Introduction of a multi-modular acceptance and usability questionnaire. Retrieved on November 15, 2008, from www.europeanbiometrics.info/images/resources/72_186_file.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar