Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Political Learning Through Entertainment – Only an Illusion?

How Motivations for Watching TV Political Talk Shows Influence Viewers’ Experiences

Published Online:January 01, 2013https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000100

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explain viewers’ entertainment and feelings of being informed when watching political talk shows on German TV, depending on their viewing motivations. First, an exploratory survey (N = 189) aims to identify the motivation. Results show that some participants had a strong interest in gaining political information by following such shows, while others simply watch them for entertainment purposes. Drawing on the concept of infotainment as well as on the elaboration likelihood model as a basis for entertainment and the feeling of being informed, four hypotheses are then tested in a 2 × 2 (focus on entertaining features versus focus on information × talk show containing a video clip versus talk show containing no video clip) experiment with 63 subjects. The results suggest that people felt better informed and were more entertained through political talk shows when watching them with a focus on entertaining features rather than with a focus on information. However, whether a talk show contained a video clip or not did not make any difference. The fact that a focus on entertaining features can induce a feeling of being informed reveals an interesting phenomenon, which is consistent with current developments in entertainment theory.

References

  • Baum, M. A. (2002). Sex, lies, and war: How soft news brings foreign policy to the inattentive public. American Political Science Review, 96, 91–109. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Baum, M. A. (2003). Soft news and political knowledge: Evidence of absence or absence of evidence? Political Communication, 20, 173–190. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bless, H. , Wänke, M. , Bohner, G. , Fellhauer, R. , Schwarz, N. (1994). Need for Cognition: Eine Skala zur Erfassung von Engagement und Freude bei Denkaufgaben [Need for cognition: A scale measuring engagement and happiness in cognitive tasks]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 25, 147–154. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cacioppo, J. T. , Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Delli Carpini, M. X. , Williams, B. A. (2001). Let us infotain you: Politics in the new media environment. In W. L. Bennett, R. M. Entman, (Eds.), Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy (pp. 160–181). New York: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fahr, A. (2008). Politische Talkshows aus Zuschauersicht: Informiertheit und Unterhaltung im Kontext der Politikvermittlung [Political talk shows from the audience’s perspective: Subjective information and entertainment in the context of political communication]. München: Reinhard Fischer. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ferré-Pavia, C. , & Gayà-Morlà, C. (2011). Infotainment and citizens’ political perceptions: Who’s afraid of ‘Polònia’? Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies, 3, 45–61. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Holbert, R. L. , Pillion, O. , Tschida, D. A. , Armfield, G. G. , Kinder, K. , Cherry, K. L. , Daulton, A. R (2003). The West Wing as endorsement of the U.S. presidency: Expanding the bounds of priming in political communication. Journal of Communication, 53, 427–443. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hollander, B. A. (2005). Late-night learning: Do entertainment programs increase political campaign knowledge for young viewers? Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49, 402–415. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kim, Y. M. , Vishak, J. (2008). Just laugh! You don’t need to remember: The effects of entertainment media on political information acquisition and information processing in political judgment. Journal of Communication, 58, 338–360. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Moy, P. , Xenos, M. A. , Hess, V. K. (2005). Communication and citizenship: Mapping the political effects of infotainment. Mass Communication & Society, 8, 111–131. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Oliver, M. B. , Bartsch, A. (2010). Appreciation as audience response: Exploring entertainment gratifications beyond hedonism. Human Communication Research, 36, 53–81. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Petty, R. E. , Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–205. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Prior, M. (2003). Any good news in soft news? The impact of soft news preference on political knowledge. Political Communication, 20, 149–171. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Programmdirektion Erstes Deutsches Fernsehen Presse und Information. (Ed.) (2010). Bericht der ARD über die Erfüllung ihres Auftrags, über die Qualität und Quantität ihrer Angebote und Programme sowie über die geplanten Schwerpunkte [§ 11e 2 Rundfunkstaatsvertrag] [Report of the ARD about the performance of its mandate, about the quality and quantity of its offerings and programs as well as about the planned key aspects (§ 11e 2 Interstate Broadcasting Treaty)] Retrieved from www.daserste.de/service/Leitlinien10-091210-p.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schneider, A. , Will, A. (2010, September). Die „Hartz-Gesellschaft” – Ist Nehmen seliger denn Geben? [The “Hartz-Society”: Is taking more decent than giving?] [Television talk show episode]. In I. Büttner, (Ed.), Anne Will. Berlin: Will Media GmbH/ARD. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schultz, T. (2006). Geschwätz oder Diskurs? Die Rationalität politischer Talkshows im Fernsehen [Chatter or discourse? The rationality of political talk shows on television] Köln: Herbert von Halem. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sharma, R. (2008). Your moment of Zen? Exploring the possibility of political enlightenment via infotainment. Ohio Communication Journal, 46, 95–108. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stevens, J. P. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stöber, J. (2001). The social desirability scale-17 (SDS-17): Convergent validity, discriminant validity, and relationship with age. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 222–232. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Vorderer, P (2001). It’s all entertainment—sure. But what exactly is entertainment? Communication research, media psychology, and the explanation of entertainment experiences. Poetics, 29, 247–261. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vorderer, P. , Klimmt, C. , Ritterfeld, U. (2004). Enjoyment: At the heart of media entertainment. Communication Theory, 14, 388–408. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar