Smart Girls, Dumb Boys!?
How the Discourse on “Failing Boys” Impacts Performances and Motivational Goal Orientation in German School Students
Abstract
We investigated effects of the media’s portrayal of boys as “scholastic failures” on secondary school students. The negative portrayal induced stereotype threat (boys underperformed in reading), stereotype reactance (boys displayed stronger learning goals towards mathematics but not reading), and stereotype lift (girls performed better in reading but not in mathematics). Apparently, boys were motivated to disconfirm their group’s negative depiction, however, while they could successfully apply compensatory strategies when describing their learning goals, this motivation did not enable them to perform better. Overall the media portrayal thus contributes to the maintenance of gender stereotypes, by impairing boys’ and strengthening girls’ performance in female connoted domains and by prompting boys to align their learning goals to the gender connotation of the domain.
References
2011). Mediennutzung als Ursache der schlechteren Schulleistungen von Jungen
([Gender-related disparities] In Geschlechtsspezifische Ungleichheiten (pp. 261–284).[Media consumption as a cause of boys’ poor scholastic achievements] . Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.2001). PISA 2000. Basiskompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern im internationalen Vergleich.
([PISA 2000. An international comparison of school students’ key competencies] Opladen, Germany: Leske, Budrich.2006). Leistungszuwachs in Mathematik: Evidenz für einen Schereneffekt im mehrgliedrigen Schulsystem?
([Performance growth in mathematics: Evidence for increasing disparities in a tracked schooling system?] . Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 20, 233–242.1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York, NY: Academic Press.
(2006). Stereotype threat: The moderating role of locus of control beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 183–197.
(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2003). School subject preferences: Age and gender differences revisited. Educational Studies, 29, 59–67.
(1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608–630.
(2011). Math-gender stereotypes in elementary school children. Child Development, 82, 766–779.
(2013). Gender differences in primary and secondary education: Are girls really outperforming boys? International Review of Education, 59, 67–86.
(1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273.
(2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In , The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218–232.
(2010). Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 103–127.
(2000). Development of the self in gendered contexts. In , The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 177–206). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2002). Challenge the science-stereotype! Der Einfluss von Technikfreizeitkursen auf das Naturwissenschaften-Stereotyp von Schülerinnen und Schülern
([Challenge the science-stereotype! The impact of technology-related leisure courses on students’ stereotypes about science] . Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 45, 341–358.2013). A stereotype threat account of boys’ academic underachievement. Child Development, 84, 1716–1733.
(2010). Sind Lehrerinnen für den geringeren Schulerfolg von Jungen verantwortlich?
([Are female teachers responsible for boys’ lower scholastic success?] . Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 62, 93–111.2012). Gender stereotyping paradoxically enhances verbal fluency performance in men. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 220, 70–77.
(1999). Why sex differences in mathematics achievement disappear in German secondary schools: A reanalysis of the German TIMSS-data. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 25, 143–161.
(2008). Vergleichsarbeiten 2008, 8. Jahrgangsstufe, Testhefte I & II, Deutsch & Mathematik
. ([Comparative studies 2008 for the 8th grade, test booklets I & II for reading and mathematics] . Berlin, Germany: IQB.2007). When negative stereotypic expectancies turn into challenge or threat: The moderating role of regulatory focus. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 66, 163–168.
(2003). Stereotype threat in the classroom: Dejection mediates the disrupting threat effect on women’s math performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 371–381.
(2008). When being a girl matters less. Accessibility of gender-related self-knowledge in single-sex and coeducational classes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 273–289.
(2008). Jugendliche und ihre Mediennutzung 1998 bis 2008
([Adolescents and their media use 1998 to 2008] . Media Perspektiven, 12, 625–634.2011). Collective school type identity: Predicting students’ motivation beyond academic self-concept. International Journal of Psychology, 46, 191–205.
(2005). Stereotype threat in men on a test of social sensitivity. Sex Roles, 52, 489–496.
(2001). Battle of the sexes: Gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 942–958.
(1985). Children’s entity and incremental theories of intelligence: Relationships to achievement behavior. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Boston, MD, USA.
(2000). Stereotype threat: Are lower status and history of stigmatization preconditions of stereotype threat? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1189–1199.
(2012). TIMSS 2011 – International results in mathematics. Chestnut Hill, MA: IEA Publishing.
(2012). PIRLS 2011 – International results in reading. Chestnut Hill, MA: IEA Publishing.
(2010). Lesekompetenz von PISA 2000 bis PISA 2009
([Reading competencies from PISA 2000 to PISA 2009] . In , PISA 2009. Bilanz nach einem Jahrzehnt (pp. 23–71)[PISA 2009: Review after a decade] . Münster, Germany: Waxmann.2012). A threat in the classroom. Gender stereotype activation and mental-rotation performance in elementary-school children. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 220, 61–69.
(2008). Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1314–1334.
(2011). Education at a glance 2011. Paris: OECD Publishing.
. (2009). Student gender stereotypes: Contrasting the perceived maleness and femaleness of mathematics and language. Educational Psychology, 29, 385–405.
(2004). Stereotype threat and performance: How self-stereotypes influence processing by inducing regulatory foci. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 38–56.
(2012). Stereotype boost: Positive outcomes from the activation of positive stereotypes. In , Stereotype threat: Theory, process, and application (pp. 141–156). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
(2004). Understanding the process of stereotype threat: A review of mediational variables and new performance goal directions. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 177–206.
(2006). The interplay among stereotypes, performance avoidance goals, and women’s math performance expectancies. Sex Roles, 54, 287–296.
(2007). The stereotyped task engagement process: The role of interest and achievement motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 99–114.
(2002). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4–28.
(2002). Die Skalen zur Erfassung von Lern–und Leistungsmotivation (SELLMO)
([Scales for the Measurement of Learning and Achievement Motivation] . Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.2010). Bildungsstand der Bevölkerung
. ([Educational achievement of the population] . Wiesbaden, Germany: Statistisches Bundesamt.2011). Statistik der allgemeinbildenden Schulen: Schüler/-innen nach Schulart und Geschlecht
. ([Statistics for general education schools: Students by school type and sex] . Wiesbaden, Germany: Statistisches Bundesamt.1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.
(2011). Separating implicit gender stereotypes regarding math and language: Implicit stereotypes are self-serving for boys and men, but not for girls and women. Sex Roles, 64, 324–335.
(2007). Rigidity and flexibility of gender stereotypes in childhood: developmental or differential. Infant and Child Development, 14, 365–381.
(1997). Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 8, 995–1015.
(2008). The effect of gender stereotype activation on challenge and threat motivational states. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 624–630.
(2003). Stereotype lift. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 456–467.
(