Skip to main content
Original Article

Seeing Is Believing

The Presence and Impact of Ambient Sexism Toward Collegiate Women in STEM

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000535

Abstract: We investigate how visual cues in universities discourage women from pursuing STEM. We extend research on ambient sexism (i.e., witnessing sexist mistreatment of others) to include environmental cues that women do not belong. Men were pictured in STEM buildings (Pilot Study 1) and described in university-sponsored STEM news articles (Pilot Study 2) twice as often as women. In an experiment, undergraduate women who read about male scientists reported less positive STEM attitudes relative to men who read about male scientists and women who read about female scientists. Women who read about and saw images of female scientists reported more positive STEM attitudes than women who simply read about female scientists. Depicting predominantly male scientists in universities negatively impacts female students.

References

  • Bradley-Geist, J. C., Rivera, I., & Geringer, S. D. (2015). The collateral damage of ambient sexism: Observing sexism impacts bystander self-esteem and career aspirations. Sex Roles, 73(1–2), 29–42. 10.1007/s11199-015-0512-y First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cech, E., Rubineau, B., Silbey, S., & Seron, C. (2011). Professional role confidence and gendered persistence in engineering. American Sociological Review, 76(5), 641–666. 10.1177/0003122411420815 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G., & Steele, C. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1045–1060. 10.1037/a0016239 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design. In B. M. StawL. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 6, pp. 191–233). JAI Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dasgupta, N. (2011). Ingroup experts and peers as social vaccines who inoculate the self-concept: The stereotype inoculation model. Psychological Inquiry, 22(4), 231–246. 10.1080/1047840X.2011.607313 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dasgupta, N., & Asgari, S. (2004). Seeing is believing: Exposure to counterstereotypic women leaders and its effect on the malleability of automatic gender stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(5), 642–658. 10.1016/j.jesp.2004.02.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., & Steele, C. M. (2005). Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women’s leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(2), 276–287. 10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.276 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dennehy, T. C., & Dasgupta, N. (2017). Female peer mentors early in college increase women’s positive academic experiences and retention in engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(23), 5964–5969. 10.1073/pnas.1613117114 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Files, J. A., Mayer, A. P., Ko, M. G., Friedrich, P., Jenkins, M., Bryan, M. J., Vegunta, S., Wittich, C. M., Lyle, M. A., Melikian, R., Duston, T., Chang, Y.-H. H., & Hayes, S. N. (2017). Speaker introductions at Internal Medicine Grand Rounds: Forms of address reveal gender bias. Journal of Women’s Health, 26(5), 413–419. 10.1089/jwh.2016.6044 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Glomb, T. M., Richman, W. L., Hulin, C. L., Drasgow, F., Schneider, K. T., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1997). Ambient sexual harassment: An integrated model of antecedents and consequences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71(3), 309–328. 10.1006/obhd.1997.2728 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Holloway, I. W., Miyashita Ochoa, A., Wu, E. S. C., Himmelstein, R., Wong, J. O., & Wilson, B. D. M. (2019). Perspectives on academic mentorship from sexual and gender minority students pursuing careers in the health sciences. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 89(3), 343–353. 10.1037/ort0000410 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jensen, L. E., & Deemer, E. D. (2019). Identity, campus climate, and burnout among undergraduate women in STEM fields. Career Development Quarterly, 67(2), 96–109. 10.1002/cdq.12174 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Johnson, I. R., Pietri, E. S., Fullilove, F., & Mowrer, S. (2019). Exploring identity-safety cues and allyship among Black women students in STEM environments. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43(2), 131–150. 10.1177/0361684319830926 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • LaCosse, J., Sekaquaptewa, D., & Bennett, J. (2016). STEM stereotypic attribution bias among women in an unwelcoming science setting. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(3), 378–397. 10.1177/0361684316630965 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lauver, K. J., & Kristof-Brown, A. (2001). Distinguishing between employees’ perceptions of person–job and person–organization fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59(3), 454–470. 10.1006/jvbe.2001.1807 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Leaper, C., & Starr, C. R. (2019). Helping and hindering undergraduate women’s STEM motivation: Experiences with STEM encouragement, STEM-related gender bias, and sexual harassment. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43(2), 165–183. 10.1177/0361684318806302 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mahoney, M. P. (2010). Students’ attitudes toward STEM: Development of an instrument for high school STEM-based programs. Journal of Technology Studies, 36(1), 24–34. 10.21061/jots.v36i1.a.4 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Major, B., & O’Brien, L. T. (2005). The social psychology of stigma. Annual Review of Psychology, 56(1), 393–421. 10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070137 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCullough, L. (2020). Proportions of women in STEM leadership in the academy in the USA. Journal of Intelligence, 10(1), 1–13. 10.3390/educsci10010001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miner, K. N., & Cortina, L. M. (2016). Observed workplace incivility toward women, perceptions of interpersonal injustice, and observer occupational well-being: Differential effects for gender of the observer. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 482. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00482 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miner-Rubino, K., & Cortina, L. M. (2004). Working in a context of hostility toward women: Implications for employees’ well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 9(2), 107–122. 10.1037/1076-8998.9.2.107 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miner-Rubino, K., & Cortina, L. M. (2007). Beyond targets: Consequences of vicarious exposure to misogyny at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1254–1269. 10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1254 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Murphy, M. C., Steele, C. M., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Signaling threat: How situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psychological Science, 18(10), 879–885. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01995.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • National Science Foundation (2019). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2019. Special Report NSF 19-304. https://nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nittrouer, C. L., Hebl, M. R., Ashburn-Nardo, L., Trump-Steele, R. C. E., Lane, D. M., & Valian, V. (2018). Gender disparities in colloquium speakers at top universities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(1), 104–108. 10.1073/pnas.1708414115 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pietri, E. S., Drawbaugh, M. L., Lewis, A. N., & Johnson, I. R. (2019). Who encourages Latina women to feel a sense of identity-safety in STEM environments? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 84, Article 103827. 10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103827 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pietri, E. S., Johnson, I. R., Majid, S., & Chu, C. (2021). Seeing what’s possible: Videos are more effective than written portrayals for enhancing the relatability of scientists and promoting Black female students’ interest in STEM. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 84(1–2), 14–33. 10.1007/s11199-020-01153-x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pietri, E. S., Johnson, I. R., & Ozgumus, E. (2018). One size may not fit all: Exploring how the intersection of race and gender and stigma consciousness predict effective identity-safe cues for Black women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 291–306. 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.06.021 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ramsey, L. R., Betz, D. E., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2013). The effects of an academic environment intervention on science identification among women in STEM. Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal, 16(3), 377–397. 10.1007/s11218-013-9218-6 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Settles, I. H., Cortina, L. M., Malley, J., & Stewart, A. J. (2006). The climate for women in academic science: The good, the bad, and the changeable. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(1), 47–58. 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00261.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sherer, M., Maddux, J. E., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R. W. (1982). The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation. Psychological Reports, 51(2), 663–671. 10.2466/pr0.1982.51.2.663 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Silver, E. (2023). Seeing is believing: The presence and impact of ambient sexism toward collegiate women in STEM [Data, code, analysis]. https://github.com/silverer/Seeing-is-Believing? First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air. How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. The American Psychologist, 52(6), 613–629. 10.1037//0003-066x.52.6.613 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Storage, D., Horne, Z., Cimpian, A., & Leslie, S. J. (2016). The frequency of “brilliant” and “genius” in teaching evaluations predicts the representation of women and African Americans across fields. PLoS ONE, 11(3), Article 015019. 10.1371/journal.pone.0150194 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Unfried, A., Faber, M., Stanhope, D. S., & Wiebe, E. (2015). The development and validation of a measure of student attitudes toward science, technology, engineering, and math (S-STEM). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33(7), 622–639. 10.1177/0734282915571160 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • US News & World Report (2019, January 22). 2019 Best National Universities | US News Rankings. Usnews.Com. https://web.archive.org/web/20190122012218/https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities First citation in articleGoogle Scholar