Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Why Not Interview?

Investigating Interviews as a Method for Judging Honesty-Humility

Published Online:November 22, 2021https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000293

Abstract

Abstract. Honesty-Humility is a valuable predictor in personnel selection; however, problems with self-report measures create a need for new tools to judge this trait. Therefore, this research examines the interview as an alternative for assessing Honesty-Humility and how to improve judgments of Honesty-Humility in the interview. Using trait activation theory, we examined the impact of interview question type on Honesty-Humility judgment accuracy. We hypothesized that general personality-tailored questions and probes would increase the accuracy of Honesty-Humility judgments. Nine hundred thirty-three Amazon Mechanical Turk workers watched and rated five interviews. Results found that general questions with probes and specific questions without probes led to the best Honesty-Humility judgments. These findings support the realistic accuracy model and provide implications for Honesty-Humility-based interviews.

References

  • Aguinis, H., Villamor, I., & Ramani, R. S. (2021). MTurk research: Review and recommendations. Journal of Management, 47(4), 823–837. 10.1177/0149206320969787 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150–166. 10.1177/1088868306294907 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2010). Trait and source factors in HEXACO‐PI‐R self‐ and observer reports. European Journal of Personality, 24(3), 278–289. 10.1002/per.759 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Birkeland, S. A., Manson, T. M., Kisamore, J. L., Brannick, M. T., & Smith, M. A. (2006). A meta-analytic investigation of job applicant faking on personality measures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14(4), 317–335. 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2006.00354.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Blackman, M. C. (2002). Personality judgment and the utility of the unstructured employment interview. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24(3), 241–250. 10.1207/S15324834BASP2403_6 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Davis, M. H., & Kraus, L. A. (1997). Personality and empathic accuracy. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Empathetic accuracy (pp. 144–168). Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • de Vries, R. E., Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2008). The Dutch HEXACO personality inventory: Psychometric properties, self-other agreement, and relations with psychopathy among low and high acquaintanceship dyads. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90(2), 142–151. 10.1080/00223890701845195 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dunlop, P. D., Holtrop, D., Schmidt, J. A., & Butcher, S. B. (2019). Investigating relative and absolute methods of measuring HEXACO personality using self- and observer reports. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 227(3), 218–224. 10.1027/2151-2604/a000380 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Funder, D. C. (1995). On the accuracy of personality judgment: A realistic approach. Psychological Review, 102(4), 652–670. 10.1037/0033-295X.102.4.652 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Goffin, R. D., Jelley, R. B., Powell, D. M., & Johnston, N. G. (2009). Taking advantage of social comparisons in performance appraisal: The relative percentile method. Human Resource Management, 48(2), 251–268. 10.1002/hrm.20278 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hall, J. A., Back, M. D., Nestler, S., Frauendorfer, D., Schmid Mast, M., & Ruben, M. A. (2018). How do different ways of measuring individual differences in zero‐acquaintance personality judgment accuracy correlate with each other? Journal of Personality, 86(2), 220–232. 10.1111/jopy.12307 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hall, J. A., Goh, J. X., Schmid Mast, M., & Hagedon, C. (2015). Individual differences in accurately judging personality from text. Journal of Personality, 84(4), 433–445. 10.1111/jopy.12170 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Johnson, M. K., Rowatt, W. C., & Petrini, L. (2011). A new trait on the market: Honesty-Humility as a unique predictor of job performance ratings. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(6), 857–862. 10.1016/j.paid.2011.01.011 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(2), 329–358. 10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2012). The H factor of personality: Why some people are manipulative, self-entitled, materialistic, and exploitive—and why it matters for everyone. Wilfrid Laurier University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lee, Y., Berry, C. M., & Gonzalez-Mulé, E. (2019). The importance of being humble: A meta-analysis and incremental validity analysis of the relationship between honesty-humility and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(6), 1–12. 10.1037/apl0000421 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Levashina, J., Hartwell, C. J., Morgeson, F. P., & Campion, M. A. (2014). The structured employment interview: Narrative and quantitative review of the research literature. Personnel Psychology, 67(1), 241–293. 10.1111/peps.12052 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Meyer, R. D., Dalal, R. S., & Hermida, R. (2010). A review and synthesis of situational strength in the organizational Sciences. Journal of Management, 36(1), 121–140. 10.1177/0149206309349309 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Morgeson, F. P., Campion, M. A., Dipboye, R. L., Hollenbeck, J. R., Murphy, K., & Schmitt, N. (2007). Reconsidering the use of personality tests in personnel selection contexts. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 683–729. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00089.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Moshagen, M., Thielmann, I., Hilbig, B. E., & Zettler, I. (2019). Meta-analytic investigations of the HEXACO personality inventory (-revised): Reliability generalization, self-observer agreement, intercorrelations, and relations to demographic variables. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 227(3), 186–194. 10.1027/2151-2604/a000377 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Oh, I.-S., Wang, G., & Mount, M. K. (2011). Validity of observer ratings of the five-factor model of personality traits: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 762–773. 10.1037/a0021832 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pletzer, J. L., Bentvelzen, M., Oostrom, J. K., & de Vries, R. E. (2019). A meta-analysis of the relations between personality and workplace deviance: Big five versus HEXACO. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112, 369–383. 10.1016/j.jvb.2019.04.004 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Powell, D. M., & Bourdage, J. S. (2016). The detection of personality traits in employment interviews: Can “good judges” be trained? Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 194–199. 10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.009 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Powell, D. M., & Goffin, R. D. (2009). Assessing personality in the employment interview: The impact of training on rater accuracy. Human Performance, 22(5), 450–465. 10.1080/08959280903248450 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Robie, C., Brown, D. J., & Beaty, J. C. (2007). Do people fake on personality inventories? A verbal protocol analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21(4), 489–509. 10.1007/s10869-007-9038-9 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schmid Mast, M., Bangerter, A., Bulliard, C., & Aerni, G. (2011). How accurate are recruiters' first impressions of applicants in employment interviews? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 19(2), 198–208. 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2011.00547.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Steiner, D. D., & Gilliland, S. W. (1996). Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in France and the United States. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(2), 134–141. 10.1037/0021-9010.81.2.134 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 500–517. 10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.500 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Van Iddekinge, C. H., Raymark, P. H., & Roth, P. L. (2005). Assessing personality with a structured employment interview: Construct-related validity and susceptibility to response inflation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(3), 536–552. 10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.536 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wiltshire, J., Bourdage, J., & Kibeom, L. (2014). Honesty-Humility and perceptions of organizational politics in predicting workplace outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(2), 235–251. 0.1007/s10869-013-9310-0 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Winkelspecht, C., Lewis, P., & Thomas, A. (2006). Potential effects of faking on the NEO-PI-R: Willingness and ability to fake changes who gets hired in simulated selection decisions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21(2), 243–259. 10.1007/s10869-006-9027-4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zettler, I., Thielmann, I., Hilbig, B. E., & Moshagen, M. (2020). The nomological net of the HEXACO model of personality: A large-scale meta-analytic investigation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(3), 723–760. 10.1177/1745691619895036 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar