Zusammenfassung: Unter passiver argumentativ-rhetorischer Kompetenz verstehen wir die Fähigkeit zur Identifikation von argumentativen, rhetorischen, argumentationslogischen und interaktiven Auffälligkeiten in einer Argumentation. Die «Skala zur Erfassung ...
Abstract: In three studies assertion and consensus motives in argumentation were researched. In Study 1 (N = 306), target persons were asked to describe their argumentative motives twice in an eight weeks interval. In addition, the argumentative motives ...
Abstract. Learning inside and outside of traditional educational settings, is often a social activity. Scientific information, such as information based on scientific knowledge, is processed in order to acquire knowledge, to solve concrete problems and/...
Abstract. The present work examines whether engagement in an argument-based intervention can support the development of evaluativist epistemological understanding. Students were randomly assigned to one of two intervention conditions – focusing on either ...
Abstract. Children and adults are mostly too optimistic when assessing their understanding of complex causal entities. Only when asked to explain the underlying mechanisms of such entities, their metacognitive self-assessment becomes more realistic. The ...
Abstract. The benefits of the exchange of arguments for science education are well established. The argumentative theory of reasoning is in a good position to explain these benefits. It claims that the main function of reasoning is to argue: to produce ...
Abstract. This commentary addresses the diverse and stimulating articles included in this special issue (Jucks & Mayweg-Paus, 2016). We begin by discussing the overall landscape of this compilation in terms of the network of new findings described and ...
Collaborative knowledge construction - theoretical and methodological aspectsAbstract. The focus of the paper is on important theoretical perspectives on collaborative knowledge construction: The socio-genetical perspective, the cognitive perspective of ...
Fair or unfair? To ignore or to respond? Evaluation of argumentational fairness and reactions to unfair contributionsAbstract. In this study, the conditions of the evaluation of and reaction to unfair argumentative contributions are investigated. Based ...
How Can Teachers and Students Learn to Understand and Use Fragile Evidence?Abstract. Being able to critically evaluate scientific evidence and using it for argumentation are central components of scientific literacy. Both students and teachers should ...
Zusammenfassung. Eine entscheidende Bedingung für sozial kompetentes Handeln sind die beteiligten sozialen Kognitionen. Diese werden im Rahmen des Ansatzes interpersonaler Aushandlungs-Strategien von Selman hinsichtlich des Niveaus der Perspektiven-...
Self-regulation in negotiation: Evaluation of a training program to improve negotiating competenceAbstract. The development and evaluation of a negotiation training program based on the model of self-regulation by Zimmerman (2000) is described. The ...