Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Originalarbeiten/Original communications

Arbeitsgedächtnis und Versprecher

Published Online:June 01, 2000https://doi.org/10.1024//0253-4533.19.12.23

Abstract

Zusammenfassung: In drei Experimenten wurde geprüft, ob die Phonologische Schleife an der Entstehung von Sprechfehlern (Spoonerismen) beteiligt ist. Die Experimente bedienten sich der SLIP-Technik zur Erzeugung von Spoonerismen. Variiert wurde in allen Experimenten der zeitliche Abstand der Induktoren von den mit ihnen phonologisch interferierenden und auszusprechenden Zielwortpaaren. Experiment 1 zeigt das erwartete Resultat: Ein phonologischer Primingeffekt ist nur nachweisbar, wenn die Primes innerhalb von zwei Sekunden vor dem Zielwortpaar dargeboten werden. Diese Ergebnisstruktur zeigte sich auch unter den Bedingungen “irrelevante Sprache” (Experiment 2) und “artikulatorische Unterdrückung” (Experiment 3). Das Ergebnis des dritten Experiments ist unter Zugrundelegung der Arbeitsgedächtnistheorie von Baddeley unerwartet.


Working memory and speech errors

Summary: Three experiments examined whether speech errors (spoonerisms) are in part determined by the phonological loop. The SLIP Technique was applied in these experiments to induce spoonerisms. The time interval between the presentation of the inductors and the targets was manipulated in all three experiments. The inductors interfered phonologically with the targets which were required to be pronounced. The first experiment, as expected, yielded the following result: A phonological priming could only be observed when the inductors were presented not more than two seconds before the presentation of the target words. This result was replicated in the irrelevant speech condition (Experiment 2) and in the articulatory suppression condition (Experiment 3). With respect to Baddeleyïs theory of working memory, the result of the third experiment was not expected.

Literatur

  • Baars, B.J. (1992). A Dozen Competing-Plans Techniques for Inducing Predictable Slips in Speech and Action.. In B.J. Baars (Ed.): Experimental Slips and Human Error (pp. 129- 150). New York: Plenum Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Baars, B.J., Motley, M.T., Mackay, D.G. (1975). Output editing for lexical status in artificially elicited slips of the tongue.. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 382–391 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Baddeley, A.D. (1997). Human Memory: Theory and Practice.. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bredenkamp, J., Dilger, S. (1998). Erkundungsexperimente über den Zusammenhang von Versprechern und Arbeitsgedächtnis.. Zeitschrift für experimentelle Psychologie, 45, 72–79 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bredenkamp, J., Hamm, S. (2001). Further experimental tests of invariance hypotheses on learning and memory processes.. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 209, 227–244 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Carroll, D.W. (1999(3)). Psychology of Language.. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1988(2)). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dell, G.S., Repka, R.J. (1992). Errors in Inner Speech.. In B.J. Baars (Ed.). Experimental slips and human error. Exploding the architecture of volition (pp. 237-262). New York: Plenum Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dosher, B.A., Ma, J.-J. (1998). Output loss or rehearsal loop? Output time versus pronunciation-time limits in immediate recall for forgetting-matched materials.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24, 316–335 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gathercole, S.E., Baddeley, A.D. (1993). Working memory and language.. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hulme, C., Newton, P., Cowan, N., Stuart, G., Brown, G. (1999). Think before you speak: Pauses, memory search, and trace redintegration processes in verbal memory span.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 25, 447–463 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jones, D.M., Macken, W.J. (1995). Phonological similarity in the irrelevant speech effect: Within - or between - stream similarity?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 103–115 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jonides, J., Reuter-Lorenz, P.A., Smith, E.E., Awh, E., Barnes, L.L., Drain, M., Glass, J., Lauber, E.J., Patalano, A.L., Schumacher, E.H. (1996). Verbal and Spatial Working Memory in Humans.. In D.L. Medin (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (pp. 43-87), vol. 35. San Diego: Academic Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lass, U., Yunqui, F., Guopeng, C., Becker, D., Lüer, G. (1999). Is memory for shapes subject to language-specific effects? An experimental study of memory span in German and Chinese subjects.. Sprache und Kognition, 18, 136–145 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Lovatt, P., Avons, S.E., Masterson, J. (2000). The Word-length Effect and Disyllabic Words.. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53 A, 1–22 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nooteboom, S.G., Cohen, A. (1975). Anticipation in speech production and its implications for perception.. In A. Cohen, S.G. Nooteboom (Eds.), Structure and process in speech perception. Berlin: Springer Verlag. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ortmann, W.D. (1983). Materialien zur Didaktisierung der Phonemik des Deutschen. Teil 2: Minimalpaare.. München: Hueber. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schüttauf, K., Bredenkamp, J., Specht, E.K. (1997). Induzierte “Freudsche Versprecher” und zwangsneurotischer Konflikt.. Sprache und Kognition, 16, 3–13 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar