Are Some Rabbits More Competent and Warm Than Others?
The Lay Epistemologist Is Interested in Object Value, Not in Descriptive Parameters
Abstract
Two theories are compared with respect to their ability to explain the emergence of two dimensions in psychological descriptions of human beings. For psychological realism, the two dimensions are assumed to be two realities existing in a descriptive (quasiscientific) psychology. Psychological descriptions are considered to be real descriptions of people’s personality; for the evaluative approach, the two dimensions are seen as two aspects of people’s social value. The psychological descriptions are considered direct expressions of a person’s social value. The results of three studies in which students were asked to give psychological descriptions of pet rabbits supported the evaluative approach. They showed (1) that a human psychological reality is not a prerequisite for the emergence of either dimension, and (2) that information about the social value of rabbits (social desirability and social utility) is enough to make the two dimensions appear.
References
2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751–763. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751
(1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258–290.
(1938). La formation de l’esprit scientifique [
(The formation of the scientific mind ]. Paris, France: Vrin.1953). Le matérialisme rationnel [
(Rational materialism ]. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.1976). Problématique des conduites sociales d’évaluation [
(The epistemology of social evaluation ]. Connexions, 19, 7–30.1995). La connaissance des utilités sociales [
(The knowledge of social utilities ]. Psychologie Française, 40, 375–387.2005). Les illusions libérales, individualisme et pouvoir social [
(Liberal illusions, individualism, and social power ]. Grenoble, France: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.2008). What about social value? European Journal of Psychology of Education, 23, 493–500. doi: 10.1007/BF03172755
(1992). Traits as evaluative categories. Current Psychology of Cognition, 12, 253–270.
(2000). Affordances in social judgment: Experimental proof of why it is a mistake to ignore how others behave toward a target and look solely at how the target behaves. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 59, 16–33. doi:10.1024/ 1421–0185.59.1.16
(2008). Deux dimensions du jugement personnologique: approche évaluative versus approche psychologique [
(Two dimensions of personnological judgment: Evaluative approach versus descriptive approach ]. Psychologia Sociala, 21, 105–119.2009). Lay psychology and the social value of persons. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 1082–1095. doi: 10.1111/j.1751–9004.2009.00225.x
(1977). Can we describe an individual’s personality? Agreement on stereotype versus individual attributes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 863–872. doi.org/ 10.1037/0022–3514.35.12.863
(2004). La désirabilité sociale et l’utilité sociale des professions et des professionnels [
(Social desirability and social utility of jobs and professionals ]. In , Perspectives cognitives et conduites sociales volume (Vol. 9, pp. 187–212). Rennes, France: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.2006). Désirabilité sociale et utilité sociale, deux dimensions de la valeur communiquée par les adjectifs de personnalité [
(Social desirability and social utility, two dimensions of value given by personality traits ]. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 19, 125–151.2007, April). Désirabilité et utilité sociale: Deux dimensions du jugement social [
(Social desirability and social utility: Two dimensions of social judgment ]. Paper presented at the meeting “35 ans de psychologie sociale avec Jean-Léon Beauvois,” Paris, France.2006). Social judgment norms and social utility: When it is more valuable to be useful than desirable. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 65, 167–180. doi: 10.1024/1421–0185.65.3.167
(2006). Norme de motivation intrinsèque et utilité sociale: Recherches dans le champ organizationnel [
(Intrinsic motivation norm and social utility: Studies in organizations ]. Psychologie du Travail et des Organizations, 12, 339–349. doi: org/10.1016/j.pto. 2006.09.0011957). Personality and motivation: Structure and measurement. New York: World Book.
(2008). Agency and communion are inferred from actions serving interests of self or others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1103–1110. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.554
(2009). Achievement goal promotion at university: Social desirability and social utility of mastery and performance goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 119–134. doi: 10.1037/a0012824
(2001). Social norms and judgments of responsibility. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 60, 35–58.
(2007). Social utility, social desirability, and scholastic judgments: Toward a personological model of academic evaluation. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22, 333–350. doi: 10.1007/BF03173572
(2005). Normes sociales de jugement et valeur: Ancrage sur l’utilité et ancrage sur la désirabilité [
(Social judgment norms and value: Anchoring in utility and anchoring in desirability ]. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 18, 43–79.2006). La valeur sociale des personnes [
(The social value of persons ]. In , Bilan et perspectives en psychologie sociale (Vol. 1, pp. 81–115). Grenoble, France: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.2010). Theory of the social value of persons applied to organizations: Typologies of “good” leaders and recruitment. European Review of Applied Psychology, 60, 255–266. doi: 10.1016/j.erap.2010.01.002
(2001). Désirabilité et utilité: Deux composantes de la valeur des personnes dans l’évaluation sociale [
(Desirability and utility: Two components of value in social evaluation ]. Orientation Scolaire et Professionnelle, 30, 391–405.2005). Normativeness and individualism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 123–146. doi:10.1002/ejsp.236
(2006). Stereotype content and relative group status across cultures. In , Social comparison processes and levels of analysis: Understanding culture, intergroup relations, and cognition (pp. 249–263). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(2007). Universal dimensions of social perception: Warmth, then competence. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11, 77–83. doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005
(1984). Social cognition. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
(1956). The sane society. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
(1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
(2001). From mice to men: What can we learn about personality from animal research? Psychological Bulletin, 127, 45–86. doi: 10.I037//0033–2909.I27.1.45
(1998). An integrative approach to personality research in anthrozoology: Ratings of six species of pets and their owners. Anthrozoös, 11, 148–156.
(1999). Personality dimensions in nonhuman animals: A cross-species review. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 69–75.
(1983). The internalization of altruistic dispositions: Cognitive analysis. In , Social cognition and social development (pp. 275–293). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 899–913. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.89.6.899
(1986). Le rôle des traits centraux dans la formation des impressions [
(The role of central traits in impression formation ]. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 6, 95–102.2005). L’optimisme: Réponse désirable et/ou socialement utile? [
(Optimism: A desirable and/or a socially useful response? ] Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 18, 153–181.2006). A five-factor theory perspective on traits and culture. Psychologie Française, 51, 227–244.
(1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.
(1962). Studies of the generality of affective meaning systems. American Psychologist, 17, 10–28.
(1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
(1967). Trait inferences: Evaluative and descriptive aspects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7 (entire issue). doi.org/10.1037/h0025230
(1986). Good and evil as softwares of the brain: On psychological “immediates” underlying the metaphysical “ultimates”: A contribution from social psychology and semantic differential research. Ultimate Reality and Meaning: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Philosophy of Understanding, 9, 210–231.
(1992). Evaluative meanings of adjectives in vitro and in context: Some theoretical implications and practical consequences of positive-negative asymmetry and behavioral-adaptive concepts of evaluation. Psychologica Belgica, 32, 211–231.
(1990). Positive-negative asymmetry in evaluations: The distinction between affective and informational negative effects. In , European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 33–60). London, UK: Wiley.
(1817). The principles of political economy and taxation. London, UK: John Murray.
(1972). Structural representations of implicit personality theory. In , Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 235–297). New York: Academic Press.
(2010, August). Modes de connaissances des objets sociaux: Leur induction et leur généralisation [
(Two ways in knowing social objects: Their induction and generalization ]. Paper presented at the 8th Congrès International de Psychologie Sociale en Langue Française, Nice, France.2008). People as resources: Exploring the functionality of warm and cold . European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1111–1120. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.509
(1975). How relevant is an individual difference theory of personality? Journal of Personality, 43, 455–484.
(1979). Accurate reflection or systematic distortions? A reply to Block, Weiss, and Thorne. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1075–1084. doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.1075
(1989). Person memory and judgment. Psychological Review, 96, 58–63.
(2008). The role of valence in the perception of agency and communion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1073–1082. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.525
(1994). Multiple meanings of behavior: Construing actions in terms of competence and morality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 222–232.
(2005). Morality and competence in person and self-perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 155–188. doi: 10.1080/10463280500229619
(2008). Compensation versus halo: The unique relation between the fundamental dimensions of social judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1110–1123. doi: 10.1177/0146167208318602
(