Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Originalarbeit

IAL-K: Entwicklung einer Kurzform der Interpersonalen Adjektivliste

Published Online:May 02, 2016https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000156

Abstract

Zusammenfassung. Der Interpersonale Circumplex (IC) ist ein etabliertes Modell zur Beschreibung und Messung interpersonaler Variablen. Die Kurzversion der Interpersonalen Adjektivliste (IAL-K) setzt das IC-Konzept zur Messung individueller Unterschiede im interpersonalen Stil um. Anhand von vier Stichproben (N1 = 1127, N2 = 610, N3 = 286, N4 = 128) wurden die IAL-Skalen um 47 % auf 34 Items gekürzt und die Kurzskalen hinsichtlich ihrer strukturellen, konvergenten und divergenten Validität, Reliabilität und zeitlichen Stabilität geprüft. Ferner wurde ihr konstruktanalytisches Potenzial an 14 Kriteriumsvariablen veranschaulicht. Die IAL-K zeigte gute Konstruktvalidität, zufriedenstellende psychometrische Eigenschaften und hohe Konvergenz zur IAL. Sie kann daher als reliable, valide und inhaltlich nahezu deckungsgleiche, jedoch deutlich ökonomischere Kurzversion der IAL betrachtet werden.


IAL-K: Development of a Short Form of the Interpersonal Adjective List

Abstract. The interpersonal circumplex (IC) is an established model for the description and assessment of interpersonal variables. The short form of the Interpersonal Adjective List (IAL-K) utilizes the IC concept to measure individual differences in interpersonal style. On the basis of data from four samples (N1 = 1127, N2 = 610, N3 = 286, N4 = 128), the IAL scales were reduced by 47 % to 34 items. The structural, convergent and discriminant validity, reliability and stability of the short scales were then examined. Furthermore, their potential to analyze interpersonal constructs was demonstrated by using 14 criterion variables. The IAL-K showed good construct validity, satisfying psychometric properties, and a high degree of convergence to the IAL. Thus, the IAL-K can be regarded as a reliable, valid, substantially equivalent, yet clearly more economic short form of the IAL.

Literatur

  • Abele, A. E. & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751 – 763. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Abele, A. E. & Wojciszke, B. (2013). The big two in social judgment and behavior. Social Psychology, 44, 61 – 62. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Acton, G. S. & Revelle, W. (2002). Interpersonal personality measures show circumplex structure based on new psychometric criteria. Journal of Personality Assessment, 79, 446-471. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Andrews, G., Singh, M. & Bond, M. (1993). The defense style questionnaire. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 181, 246 – 256. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Biberacher, L., Strack, M. & Braumandl, I. (2011). Coaching von Studierenden für Studierende: Evaluation einer Ausbildung zum Karriere-Coach. Wirtschaftspsychologie aktuell, 18(3), 50 – 52. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Browne, M. W. (1992). Circumplex models for correlation matrices. Psychometrika, 57, 469 – 497. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Browne, M. W., MacCallum, R. C., Kim, C. T., Andersen, B. L. & Glaser, R. (2002). When fit indices and residuals are incompatible. Psychological Methods, 7, 403 – 421. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gifford, R. (1994). A lens-mapping framework for understanding the encoding and decoding of interpersonal dispositions in nonverbal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 398 – 412. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gurtman, M. B. & Pincus, A. L. (2003). The circumplex model: Methods and research applications. In J. A. SchinkaW. F. VelicerEds., Comprehensive handbook of psychology: Vol 2. Research methods in psychology (pp. 407 – 416). New York: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Guttman, L. (1954). A new approach to factor analysis: The radix. In P. F. LazarsfeldEd., Mathematical thinking in the social sciences (pp. 258 – 348). Glencoe, IL: The Free Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Helgeson, V. S. (1994). Relation of agency and communion to well-being: Evidence and potential explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 412 – 428. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hopwood, C. J. & Donnellan, M. B. (2010). How should the internal structure of personality inventories be evaluated? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 332 – 346. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Horowitz, L. M. & Strack, S. (Eds.) (2010). Handbook of interpersonal psychology: theory, research, assessment and therapeutic interventions. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jacobs, I. (2009). Interpersonaler Circumplex: Validierung der Interpersonalen Adjektivliste und Analyse interpersonaler Komplementarität in engen persönlichen Beziehungen. München: Dr. Hut. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jacobs, I. & Scholl, W. (2005). Interpersonale Adjektivliste (IAL). Die empirische Umsetzung theoretischer Circumplex-Eigenschaften für die Messung interpersonaler Stile. Diagnostica, 51, 145 – 155. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Jacobs, I. & Scholl, W. (2007). Übersetzung und Validierung der Skala zur Erfassung übermäßiger Communion von Helgeson und Fritz. Diagnostica, 53, 57 – 67. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Kapfhammer, H.-P. (1995). Psychosoziale Entwicklung im jungen Erwachsenenalter: Entwicklungspsychopathologische Vergleichsstudien an psychiatrischen Patienten und seelisch gesunden Probanden. Berlin: Springer. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kiesler, D. J. (1996). Contemporary interpersonal theory and research: Personality, psychopathology, and psychotherapy. New York: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York, NY: Ronald. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lischetzke, T., Eid, M., Wittig, F. & Trierweiler, L. (2001). Die Wahrnehmung eigener und fremder Gefühle. Konstruktion und Validierung von Skalen zur Erfassung der emotionalen Selbst- und Fremdaufmerksamkeit sowie der Klarheit über Gefühle. Diagnostica, 47, 167 – 177. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Little, B., Lecci, L. & Watkinson, B. (1992). Personality and personal projects: Linking big five and PAC units of analysis. Journal of Personality, 60, 501 – 525. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Locke, K. D. (2010). Circumplex measures of interpersonal constructs. In L. M. HorowitzS. StrackEds., Handbook of interpersonal psychology (pp. 313 – 324). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Markey, P. M. & Kurtz, J. E. (2006). Increasing acquaintanceship and complementarity of behavioral styles and personality traits among college roommates. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 32, 907-916. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Markey, P. M. & Markey, C.N. (2009). A brief assessment of the interpersonal circumplex: The IPIP-IPC. Assessment, 16, 352 – 361. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McCrae, R. R., Zonderman, A. B., Costa, P. T., Bond, M. H. & Paunonen, S. V. (1996). Evaluating replicability of factors in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 552 – 566. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Musch, J., Ostapczuk, M. & Klaiber, Y. (2012). Validating an inventory for the assessment of egoistic bias and moralistic bias as two separable components of social desirability. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 620 – 629. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ostendorf, F. (2001). Measuring interpersonal behavior with the German Interpersonal Adjective Scales. In R. RiemannF. M. SpinathF. OstendorfEds., Personality and temperament: Genetics, evolution, and structure (pp. 232 – 255). Lengerich: Pabst. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Petrides, K. V. (2010). Trait emotional intelligence theory. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 3, 136 – 139. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pincus, A. L. & Ansell, E. B. (2003). Interpersonal theory of personality. In T. MillonM. J. LernerEds., Handbook of psychology. Volume 5: Personality & social psychology (pp. 209 – 229). New York: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pöhlmann, K. & Brunstein, J. C. (1997). GOALS: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung von Lebenszielen. Diagnostica, 43, 63 – 79. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Scholl, W. (2013). The socio-emotional basis of human interaction and communication: How we construct our social world. Social Science Information, 52, 3 – 33. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stöber, J. (1999). Die Soziale-Erwünschtheits-Skala-17 (SES-17): Entwicklung und erste Befunde zu Reliabilität und Validität. Diagnostica, 45, 173 – 177. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Strack, M., Jacobs, I. & Grosse Holtforth, M. (2013). Reliability of circumplex axes. Sage Open, 3, 1 – 12. Zugriff am 02. 06. 2013 unter http://sgo.sagepub.com. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Strauß, B. & Thomas, A. (2012). Measurement of patient involvement – What do concepts of psychotherapy research contribute? Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen, 106, 238 – 246. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Thomas, A., Locke, K. & Strauß, B. (2012). Das Inventar zur Erfassung interpersonaler Motive: Entwicklung und Validierung einer deutschsprachigen Version der Circumplex Scales of Interpersonal Values. Diagnostica, 58, 211 – 226. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Trobst, K. K. (2000). An interpersonal conceptualization and quantification of social support transactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 971 – 986. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wiggins, J. S. (2003). Paradigms of personality assessment. New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wiggins, J. S., Trapnell, P. & Phillips, N. (1988). Psychometric and geometric characteristics of the Revised Interpersonal Adjective Scales (IAS-R). Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 517 – 530. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zeigler-Hill, V. & Pratt, D.H. (2007). Defense styles and the interpersonal circumplex: The interpersonal nature of psychological defense. Journal of Psychiatry, Psychology and Mental Health, 1, 1 – 15. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zimmermann, J. & Wright, A. G. C. (2015). Beyond description in interpersonal construct validation: Methodological advances in the circumplex structural summary approach. Assessment, 1073191115621795. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar