Cyberbullying in Internet-Chatrooms – Wer sind die Täter?
Ein Vergleich von Bullying in Internet-Chatrooms mit Bullying in der Schule aus der Täterperspektive
Abstract
Zusammenfassung. Das Phänomen des Bullying ist nicht mehr auf das schulische Umfeld begrenzt. Formen verbaler Gewalt und sozialer Manipulation spielen auch in Internet-Chatrooms eine bedeutende Rolle. Ziel der vorliegenden Untersuchung war ein Vergleich der Phänomene Schulbullying und Chatbullying. 1.700 Schüler verschiedener weiterführender Schulen aus Nordrhein-Westfalen nahmen an einer quantitativen Befragung teil. Erfasst wurden neben aktivem Bullying in Internet-Chatrooms und in der Schule auch Aspekte des Selbstkonzepts, des Familien- und Erziehungsklimas, der Schulsituation sowie Delinquenz, Gewalteinstellung und dissoziales Verhalten im Internet. Die Studie zeigt einen starken Zusammenhang zwischen der Täterschaft in der Schule und der Täterschaft in Internet-Chatrooms: Schulbullies sind signifikant häufiger als andere Jugendliche auch Chatbullies. Außerdem lassen sich Schulbullying und Chatbullying überwiegend durch die gleichen Prädiktoren vorhersagen.
Abstract. Bullying is not a specific phenomenon of the school environment. Different forms of verbal victimisation and social manipulation are also common behaviors in internet chatrooms. The present study compares traditional bullying with chatroom bullying. A total of 1,700 pupils of different secondary schools (aged 10 to 19) participated and were asked about their own aggressive behavior in school and in internet chatrooms. Variables like self-confidence, child-parent-relationship, school situation, delinquency, dissocial behavior on the internet, and attitudes to aggression were also examined. The results show that bullies in school are also significantly more often bullies in chatrooms than others. Furthermore, bullying behavior in school and in chatrooms is determined by similar predictors.
Literatur
1985). Boys with peer adjustment problems: Social cognitive processes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 80–87.
(2005). Bullying on the net: Adverse behavior on e-mail and its impact. Information & Management, 42, 361–371.
(2006). Bullying.org: A Learning Journey. Bulletin – Newfoundland and Labrador Teachers Association, 49 (4), 20.
(2005). Cyber-Harassment: A study of a new method for an old behaviour. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32, 265–277.
(1989). Peer rejection and self-perceptions among early elementary school children: Aggressive rejectees versus withdrawn rejectees. In , Social Competence in developmental perspectice (pp. 392–393). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
(1994). Bully/victim problems in middle school children: Stability, self perceived competence, peer perceptions and peer acceptance. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 315–329.
(1992). Bully/victim problems among middle school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 73–87.
(2005).Cyber bullying: An old problem in a new guise? Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 15, 68–76.
(1998). The relationship among bullying, victimization, depression, anxiety and aggression in elementary school children. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 123–130.
(1990). Children’s perceptions of the outcomes of aggressive strategies: Do the ends justify being mean? Developmental Psychology, 26, 612–620.
(1984). Inventar zu Selbstkonzept und Selbstvertrauen. Konstanz: Projektbericht aus dem SFB 23.
(2000). Online victimization: A report on nation’s youth. National Center of Missing & Exploited Children. Available: www.unh.edu/ccrc/Youth_Internet_info_page.html [July 2003].
(2000). Jugend 2000. 13. Shell Jugendstudie. Leske und Budrich.
(1985). The Construction of the Self: A Developmental Perspective. New York: The Guilford Press.
(1998). A review of predictors of youth violence. In , Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 106–146). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(1995). Gewalt. Schattenseiten der Individualisierung bei Jugendlichen aus unterschiedlichen Milieus. Weinheim: Juventa.
(2005). Research summary: Cyberbullying victimization. Preliminary findings from an online survey of Internet-using adolescents. Available: www.cyberbullying.us [January 2006].
(2003). Longitudinal relations between children’s exposure to TV violence and their aggressive and violent behavior in adulthood: 1977–1992. Developmental Psychology, 39, 201–221.
(2000). Bullying at school: An indicator of adolescents at risk for mental disorders. Journal of Adolescence, 23, 661–674.
(2001). Bullying in Britain: Testimonies from Teenagers. East Molesey: Young Voice.
(in print ). Cyberbullying in Chatrooms – Who are the victims? Journal of Media Psychology.1998). Teasing in hierarchical and intimate relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1231–1247.
(2005). Aggression und Gewalt in Chatrooms.
(Unveröffentlichte Diplomarbeit, Universität Köln .1998). Bullying and psychiatric symptoms among elementary school-age children. Child Abuse & Neglect, 22, 705–717.
(1994). Indirect aggression in boys and girls. In , Aggressive behavior: Current perspectives (pp. 131–150). New York: Plenum.
(2006). Cyberbullying in Schools. A Research of Gender Differences. School Psychology International, 27 (2), 157–170.
(2007). New bottle but old wine: A research of cyberbullying in schools. Computers in Human Behaviour, 23, 1777–1791.
(1998). Predictors of violent or serious delinquency in adolescence and early adulthood. In , Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 86–105). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(1998). Zum Einfluss des Familienklimas und der Gleichaltrigengruppe auf den Zusammenhang zwischen Substanzengebrauch und antisozialem Verhalten von Jugendlichen. Kindheit und Entwicklung, 7, 208–220.
(2003). Aggression und Delinquenz unter Jugendlichen. Untersuchung von kognitiven und sozialen Bedingungen (Polizei & Forschung, Bd. 20, S. 28). Köln: Luchterhand.
(1996). Schulische Gewaltformen und Täter-Opfer-Problematik. In , Gewalt an Schulen (S. 121–148). Opladen: Leske & Budrich.
(2004). Cross-national consistency in the relationship between bullying behaviors and psychosocial adjustment. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 158, 730–736.
(2001). Bullying behaviours among US youth: Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2094–2100.
(2005). How Students and Teachers View the Seriousness of Peer Harassment: When Is It Appropriate to Seek Help? Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 97, No. 3, 347–365.
(2001). Soziale Lebenslagen und Delinquenz von Jugendlichen. Ergebnisse der MPI- Schulbefragung 1999 in Köln und Freiburg. Freiburg: edition iuscrim.
(1978). Aggression in the schools: Bullying and whipping boys. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
(1989). The Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Mimeograph. Bergen, Norway.
(1993). Bullying at school: What We Know and What We Can Do. Oxford: Blackwell.
(1987). Peer acceptance and later personal adjustment: Are low-accepted children at risk? Psychological Bulletin, 102, 57–389.
(2006). Bullies Move Beyond the Schoolyard: A Preliminary Look at Cyberbullying. Juvenile and Justice, 2, 148.
(2007). Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, Vol. 43, No. 3, 564–575.
(2007). International Perspectives on Cyberbullying. Presentation at the Conference: 13th European Conference on Developmental Psychology, Jena, Germany, 21–25. August 2007.
(2004). Consequences of School Bullying and Violence. Presentation at the Conference: Taking fear out of schools, Stavanger, Norway, 5–8 September 2004.
(1999). Self-Evaluated Self-Esteem, Peer-Evaluated Self-Esteem and Defensive Egotism as Predictors of Adolescents’ Participation in Bullying Situations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1268–1278.
(1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behaviour, 22, 1–15.
(2005). ”I’ m O. K. but you’ re not” and other peer-relational schemas. Explaining individual differences in children’ s social goals. Developmental Psychology, 41, 363–375.
(2003). Aggressives Verhalten von Jungen und Mädchen. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
(2005). Lästern, soziale Manipulation, Gerüchte verbreiten, Ausschließen – (geschlechtspezifische) Formen aggressiven Verhaltens? In , Aggressionsentwicklung zwischen Normalität und Pathologie (S. 66–87). Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht.
(2007). Psychologische Aggressionstheorien. In , Gewaltprävention bei Kindern und Jugendlichen. Band I: Grundlagen zu Aggression und Gewalt in Kindheit und Jugend (S. 15–37). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
(2008). Cyber-bullying: Another main type of bullying? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49, 147–154.
(2000). Bullying in schools: Lessons from two decades of research. Aggressive Behaviour, 26, 1–9.
(2002). Definitions of Bullying: A Comparison of terms used, and age and gender differences, in a Fourteen-Country international comparison. Child Development, 73, 4, 1119–33.
(2004). Definition, types and prevalence of school bullying and violence. Presentation at the Conference: Taking fear out of schools, Stavanger, Norway, 5–8 September 2004.
(2004). Bullying in schools: How successful can intervention be? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. (2006). An investigation into cyberbullying, its forms, awareness and impact, and the relationship between age and gender in cyberbullying. A report for the Anti-Bullying Alliance. Available: http:/www.anti-bullyingalliance.org.uk [Zugriffsdatum].
(2008). Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 376–385.
(2007). Aspects of Cyberbullying in the U.K. Quantitative and Qualitative Data. Presentation at the Conference: 13th European Conference on Developmental Psychology, Jena, Germany, 21–25. August 2007.
(2006). Monitor Internet en jongeren: Pesten op Internet en het psychosociale welbevinden van jongeren [Cyberbullying and the psychosocial well-being of adolescents]. Rotterdam: IVO Factsheet.
(submitted ). Cyber bullying among youngsters: prevalence and profile of bullies and victims.2005). Bullying and Victimization in Elementary Schools: A Comparison of Bullies, Victims, Bully/Victims, and Uninvolved Preadolescents. Developmental Psychology, Vol. 41, 672–682.
(2006). Cyberbullying and Cyberthreats. Responding to the Challenge of Online Social Cruelty, Threats, and Distress. Center for Safe and Responsible Internet Use, Oregon.
(2001). Bullying and victimization of primary school children in England and Germany: Prevalence and school factors. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 673–696.
(2004). Online aggressors/targets, aggressors, and targets: a comparison of associated youth characteristics. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 1308–1316.
(