Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/0049-8637/a000194

Abstract. The duality of research and teaching is fundamental for university systems; however, it is often experienced as stressful. A study with 819 university scholars indicated the importance of subjective perceptions of the teaching–research nexus. Such views could be differentiated in perceived integration (e. g., research is part of teaching) and perceived synergy (e. g., research enriches teaching). Structural equation modeling showed that only perceived synergy was associated with reduced occupational stress.


Subjektive Vereinbarkeit von Forschung und Lehre als Bedingung des Belastungserlebens an der Universität

Zusammenfassung. Die Dualität von Forschung und Lehre wird als konstitutiv für das System Universität postuliert, häufig jedoch als belastend erlebt. Eine Studie mit 819 Wissenschaftler(inne)n verweist auf die Bedeutsamkeit der subjektiv wahrgenommenen Vereinbarkeit von Forschung und Lehre. Hierbei ließ sich die wahrgenommene wechselseitige Verortung (z. B. Forschung als Teil von Lehre) von der wahrgenommenen Synergie (z. B. Forschung bereichert Lehre) unterscheiden. Ergebnisse eines Strukturgleichungsmodells indizierten, dass (nur) die wahrgenommene Synergie von Forschung und Lehre mit reduziertem Belastungserleben zusammenhing.

References

  • Abele, A. E., & Candova, A. (2007). Prädiktoren des Belastungserlebens im Lehrerberuf [Predicting teachers’ stress experience: Findings from a 4-year longitudinal study]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie / German Journal of Educational Psychology, 21, 107 – 118. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652.21.2.107 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Barnett, R. (1992). Linking teaching and research. The Journal of Higher Education, 63, 619 – 636. https://doi.org/10.2307/1982047 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Becker, F. G. (2012). Governance von Hochschulen [Governance of universitites]. In F. BeckerE. WildEds., Gute Lehre in der Hochschule [Good teaching at the university] (pp. 31 – 50). Bielefeld, Germany: Bertelsmann. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Binder, G., & Hewel, P. (1980). Universitäre Ausbildung durch Forschungsbeteiligung [Schooling at universities through participation in reseach]. Bildungsforschung und Bildungspraxis / Education and Research, 3, 73 – 79. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Blix, A., Cruise, R., Mitchell, B., & Blix, G. (1994). Occupational stress among university teachers. Educational Research, 36, 157 – 169. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188940360205 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brinckmann, H., Garcia, O., Gruschka, A., Lenhardt, G., & Zur Lippe, R. (2002). Die Einheit von Forschung und Lehre [The unity of research and teaching]. Wetzlar, Germany: Büchse der Pandora. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Büssing, A., & Glaser, J. (1999). German Version of the Maslach Burnout Inventory – General Survey (MBI-GS-D). Munich, Germany: Technical University, Department of Psychology. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464 – 504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Coate, K., Barnett, R., & Williams, G. (2001). Relationships between teaching and research in higher education in England. Higher Education Quarterly, 55, 158 – 174. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2273.00180 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Daumiller, M. (2018). Motivation von Wissenschaftlern in Lehre und Forschung: Struktur, Eigenschaften, Bedingungen und Auswirkungen selbstbezogener Ziele [Motivation of university scholars for teaching and research: Structure, attributes, antecedens, and consequences of achievement goals]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21182-0 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Daumiller, M., Dickhauser, O., & Dresel, M. (2018). University instructors’ achievement goals for teaching: Four basic structural issues. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(3). Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000271 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Del Rey, E. (2001). Teaching versus research: A model of state university competition. Journal of Urban Economics, 49, 356 – 373. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.2000.2193 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dweck, C. S. (1996). Implicit theories as organizers of goals and behavior. In P. M. GollwitzerJ. A. BarghEds., The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 69 – 90). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Esdar, W., Gorges, J., Kloke, K., Krücken, G., & Wild, E. (2011). Lehre unter den Forschungshut bringen [Combining teaching with research]. In S. NickelEd., Der Bologna-Prozess aus Sicht der Hochschulforschung [The Bologna process as seen by higher education research] (pp. 192 – 203). Gütersloh, Germany: CHE. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Esdar, W., Gorges, J., & Wild, E. (2012). Karriere, Konkurrenz und Kompetenzen [Career, competition and competences]. Die Hochschule, 21, 273 – 290. Retrieved from http://www.hof.uni-halle.de/journal/texte/12_2/EsdarGorgesWild.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Esdar, W., Gorges, J., & Wild, E. (2013). Synergieeffekte und Ressourcenkonflikte von Forschung & Lehre auf dem Weg zur Professur [Facilitation and interference between the research and teaching goals of junior scientists]. Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung/Journal for Higher Education Development, 8, 29 – 41. Retrieved from http://www.zfhe.at/index.php/zfhe/article/view/537/559 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fach, W. (2012). Tintenfische. “Bologna” und die Professoren [Octopuses. Bologna and the Professors]. Austrian Journal of Political Science, 41, 323 – 330. https://doi.org/10.15203/ozp.58.vol41iss3 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fox, M. F. (1992). Research, teaching, and publication productivity. Sociology of Education, 65, 293 – 305. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112772 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Freudenberger, H. J. (1974). Staff burn-out. Journal of Social Issues, 30, 159 – 165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1974.tb00706.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hattie, J., & Marsh, H. W. (1996). The relationship between research and teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 507 – 542. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004507 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jucks, R., & Hillbrink, A. (2017). Perspective on research and teaching in psychology: Enrichment or burden? Psychology Learning & Teaching, 16, 306 – 322. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725717705205 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53 – 60. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jacob, A. K., & Teichler, U. (2011). Der Wandel des Hochschullehrerberufs im internationalen Vergleich [Change of the academic profession in international comparison]. Kassel, Germany: Federal Ministry of Education and Research. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jaksztat, S., Preßler, N., & Briedis, K. (2012). Promotionen im Fokus [Spotlight on PhD studies]. HIS: Forum Hochschule, 15, 1 – 160. Retrieved from http://www.dzhw.eu/pdf/pub_fh/fh-201215.pdf. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lackritz, J. (2004). Exploring burnout among university faculty: Incidence, performance, and demographic issues. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 713 – 729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.07.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Light, D. (1974). The structure of the academic professions. Sociology of Education, 47, 2 – 28. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112165 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Trigwell, K., Nevgi, A., & Ashwin, P. (2006). How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 285 – 298. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600680539 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Little, T. D., Rhemtulla, M., Gibson, K., & Schoemann, A. M. (2013). Why the items versus parcels controversy needn’t be one. Psychological Methods, 18, 285 – 300. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033266. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Locke, W. (2005). Integrating research and teaching strategies. Higher Education Management and Policy, 16, 101 – 120. https://doi.org/10.1787/hemp-v16-art25-en First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. (1987). Students’ evaluations of university teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 253 – 388. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(87)90001-2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., & Hattie, J. (2002). The relation between research productivity and teaching effectiveness. Journal of Higher Education, 603 – 641. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2002.0047 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., & Leiter, M. P. (1996). Maslach burnout inventory manual. Mountain View, CA: CPP. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2008). Early predictors of job burnout and engagement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 498 – 512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.498 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397 – 422. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meier, F., & Schimank, U. (2009). Matthäus schlägt Humboldt? New Public Management und die Einheit von Forschung und Lehre [Matthew beats humboldt? New public management and the teaching-research nexus]. Beiträge zur Hochschulforschung / Journal of Higher Education Research, 31, 42 – 61. Retrieved from http://www.bzh.bayern.de/uploads/media/1-2009-meier-schimank.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (2014). Mplus (version 7.3) [Computer Software]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Neumann, R. (1992). Perceptions of the teaching-research nexus: A framework for analysis. Higher Education, 23, 159 – 171. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00143643 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Olsen, D., & Simmons, A. (1996). The research versus teaching debate. ;New Directions for Institutional Research;, 1996, 31 – 39. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.37019969006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peugh, J. L., & Enders, C. K. (2004). Missing data in educational research. Review of Educational Research, 74, 525 – 556. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074004525 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ramsden, P., & Moses, I. (1992). Associations between research and teaching in Australian higher education. Higher Education, 23, 273 – 295. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sample, S. B. (1972). Inherent conflict between research and education. Educational Record, 53, 17 – 22. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ052875 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schaeper, H. (1997). Lehrkulturen, Lehrhabitus und die Struktur der Universität [Teaching cultures, teaching habitus and the structures of university]. Weinheim, Germany: Deutscher Studien Verlag. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schimank, U., & Winnes, M. (2000). Beyond Humboldt? The relationship between teaching and research in European university systems.  Science and Public Policy, 27, 397 – 408. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154300781781733 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitz, E. (1996). Die Lehrperson zwischen Selbstkonstruktion und Burnout [The teacher as a person between self-construction and burnout]. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 24, 361 – 375. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitz, G. (2001). Kann Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung Lehrer vor Burnout schützen [Can perceived self-efficacy protect against burnout]? Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 48, 49 – 67. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Singh, S. N., Mishra, S., & Kim, D. (1998). Research-related burnout among faculty in higher education. Psychological Reports, 83, 463 – 473. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1998.83.2.463 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smeby, J.-C. (1998). Knowledge production and knowledge transmission. Teaching in Higher Education, 3, 5 – 20. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356215980030101 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spinath, B., & Stiensmeier-Pelster, J. (2001). Implicit theories about the malleability of intelligence and ability. Psychology Science Quarterly, 43, 53 – 76. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Teichler, U. (2014). Teaching and research in Germany: The notion of university professors. In J. C. ShinA. ArimotoW. K. CummingsU. TeichlerEds., Teaching and research in contemporary higher education (pp. 61 – 87). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tönjes, B., & Dickhäuser, O. (2009). Längsschnittliche Effekte von Zielorientierungen auf Dimensionen des beruflichen Belastungserlebens im Lehrberuf [Longitudinal effects of goal orientation on factors of occupational burden in the teacher profession]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 41, 79 – 86. https://doi.org/10.1026/0049-8637.41.2.79 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Watts, J., & Robertson, N. (2011). Burnout in university teaching statt: A systematic literature review. Educational Research, 53, 33 – 50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2011.552235 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Webster, D. (1986). Research productivity and classroom teaching effectiveness. Instructional Evaluation, 9, 14 – 20. Retrieved from http://www.freepatentsonline.com/article/Academy-Educational-Leadership-Journal/219062366.html First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P. M. (2000). Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data. Sociological Methodology, 30, 165 – 200. https://doi.org/10.1111/0081-1750.00 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar