Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Articles

Investigating the Structure of Attention

How Do Test Characteristics of Paper-Pencil Sustained Attention Tests Influence Their Relationship with Other Attention Tests?

Published Online:May 09, 2008https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.24.2.108

Abstract

The present study examined the influence of different test modi on the relationship between two different sustained attention (SA) tests – one with predominant processing and one with predominant perception demands – and a test of selective attention. Therefore, each attention test was presented in five different modi (paper-pencil, self-paced with item blocks, self-paced with single items, computer-paced with item blocks, computer-paced with single items) and administered to 110 participants. The original versions of different tests correlated only weakly to moderately. But when these tests were modified to correspond in terms of modus, they showed strong correlations. For tests with a predominant perception demand MTMM analyses revealed that the pace modus (self-paced vs. computer-paced) had a higher impact than the tests themselves. A measurement model was established with two attention test factors and three modus factors. The modi of test presentation proved to be distinguishable and accounted for 59.9% of variance in the task set. It is argued that the attention facet tapped by different tests is a function of the task itself, but also of the way this task is presented.

References

  • Brickenkamp, R. (2002). Test d2: Aufmerksamkeits-Belastungs-Test (9. Auflage) [The d2 test – A timed test of selective attention]. Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Campbell, G.T. , Fiske, D.W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dudgeon, P. (2003). NIESEM: A computer program for calculating noncentral interval estimates (and power analysis) for structural equation modeling (computer software). Retrieved June 12, 2007, from the personal homepage of Paul Dudgeon: http://rubens.its.unimelb.edu.au/%7Edudgeon/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fan, X. , Thompson, B. , Wang, L. (1999). Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 56–83. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Goldhammer, F. , Moosbrugger, H. , Schweizer, K. (2007). On the separability of cognitive abilities related to Posner’s attention components. European Psychologist, 12, 103–118. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Horn, J.L. , Noll, J. (1994). System for understanding cognitive capabilities: A theory and the evidence on which it is based. In D.K. Detterman, (Ed.), Current topics in human intelligence, Vol.4: Theories of intelligence (pp. 151–203). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L.T. , Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Krumm, S. , Schmidt-Atzert, L. , Michalczyk, K. , Danthiir, V. (in press). Sustained attention and mental speed abilities: The same or different constructs? Journal of Individual Differences. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marschner, G. (1980). Revisions-Test [Revision test]. Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mirsky, A.F. , Anthony, B.J. , Duncan, C.C. , Ahearn, M.B. , Kellam, S.G. (1991). Analysis of the elements of attention: A neuropsychological approach. Neuropsychology Review, 2, 109–145. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Moosbrugger, H. , Goldhammer, F. , Schweizer, K. (2006). Latent factors underlying individual differences in attention measures – perceptual and executive attention. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22, 177–188. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Schmidt-Atzert, L. , Buehner, M. (1997). Komponenten von Konzentrationstestleistungen: Eine Untersuchung mit systematisch variierten Durchstreichtest-Varianten [Components of performance in concentration tests: A study with systematically varied canceling tests]. Diagnostica, 43, 314–326. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schmidt-Atzert, L. , Buehner, M. , Enders, P. (2006). Messen Konzentrationstests Konzentration? Eine Analyse von Konzentrationstestleistungen [Do concentration tests assess concentration? Analyzing components of concentration test performances]. Diagnostica, 52, 33–44. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Schmidt-Atzert, L. , Krumm, S. , Buehner, M. (2007). Aufmerksamkeitsdiagnostik: Ableitung eines Strukturmodells und systematische Einordnung von Tests [Assessment of attention: Derivation of a structural model and systematic classification of tests]. Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schweizer, K. (2005). An overview of research into the cognitive basis of intelligence. Journal of Individual Differences, 26, 43–51. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Schweizer, K. , Moosbrugger, H. , Goldhammer, F. (2005). The structure of the relationship between attention and intelligence. Intelligence, 33, 589–611. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sturm, W. (2006). Wahrnehmungs- und Aufmerksamkeitsfunktionen [Functions of perception and attention]. Mödling, Austria: Schuhfried. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Van Zomeren, A.H. , Brouwer, W.H. (1994). Clinical Neuropsychology of Attention. New York: Oxford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Westhoff, K. (1995). Aufmerksamkeit und Konzentration [Attention and concentration]. In M. Amelang, (Ed.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie: Bd. C VIII 2, Verhaltens- und Leistungsunterschiede [Encyclopedia of psychology: C VIII 2. Individual differences in behavior and achievement] (pp. 375–402). Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zimmermann, P. , Fimm, B. (1993). Testbatterie zur Aufmerksamkeitsprüfung (TAP) [Testbattery for attentional performance]. Würselen, Germany: Vera Fimm Psychologische Testsysteme. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar